Volume 146, Issue 2 pp. 152-159
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Congenital myopathies in adults: A diagnosis not to overlook

Maria João Pinto

Corresponding Author

Maria João Pinto

Department of Neurology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, E.P.E., Porto, Portugal

Department of Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal

Correspondence

Maria João Pinto, Neurology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro 4200-319 Porto, Portugal.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Bárbara Alves Passos

Bárbara Alves Passos

Department of Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal

Search for more papers by this author
Ana Grangeia

Ana Grangeia

Department of Medical Genetics, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, E.P.E., Porto, Portugal

Department of Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal

Search for more papers by this author
Joana Guimarães

Joana Guimarães

Department of Neurology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, E.P.E., Porto, Portugal

Department of Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal

Search for more papers by this author
Luís Braz

Luís Braz

Department of Neurology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, E.P.E., Porto, Portugal

Department of Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 12 May 2022
Citations: 4

Abstract

Background

Congenital myopathies (CM) were traditionally classified according to the muscle histopathological features, but in recent years, molecular diagnosis has become increasingly important. CM may present a wide phenotype variability, and while adult-onset CM have been increasingly recognized, substantial diagnostic delays are still reported.

Objectives

To describe a cohort of adult CM patients, including clinical, genetic, and histopathological features, and further characterize the subgroup of adult-diagnosed patients.

Materials and Methods

We performed a retrospective observational cohort study to characterize the CM patients evaluated in our adult Neuromuscular outpatient clinic, including the subgroup of adult-diagnosed patients.

Results

We identified 19 CM patients with compatible molecular and/or histological diagnoses, of which 14 were diagnosed in adulthood. Eleven adult-diagnosed patients had symptoms since childhood and 9 had a family history of myopathy. The median age of symptoms' onset was 4 years old and the median age at diagnosis was 37 years old. The most common causative gene was RYR1, followed by TTN and MYH7. Three patients had non-specific features on muscle biopsy, all diagnosed during adulthood.

Conclusions

In our cohort, the majority of CM were diagnosed in adulthood, despite most having pediatric-onset symptoms and positive family history. The diagnostic delay may be associated with mild presentation, slow course, atypical muscle histology, and lack of awareness of adult-onset CM. Studies with larger populations are needed.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.