Volume 61, Issue 3 pp. 361-366
Medical Imaging—Technical Article

CT brain perfusion: A static phantom study of contrast-to-noise ratio and radiation dose

Stewart M Midgley

Corresponding Author

Stewart M Midgley

Department of Radiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital and University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

South Australian Medical Imaging, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia

School of Physics and Astronomy, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia

Correspondence

Dr Stewart M Midgley, South Australian Medical Imaging, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Damien L Stella

Damien L Stella

Department of Radiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital and University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Bruce CV Campbell

Bruce CV Campbell

Department of Medicine and Neurology, Royal Melbourne Hospital and University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Francesca Langenberg

Francesca Langenberg

Department of Radiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital and University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Paul F Einsiedel

Paul F Einsiedel

Department of Radiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital and University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 27 November 2016
Citations: 3
SM Midgley PhD, MSc; DL Stella MBBS, FRANZCR; BCV Campbell MBBS, BMedSc, PhD, FRACP; F Langenberg DCR(R); PF Einsiedel BSc (AppPhys) (Hons).
Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no financial or other conflict of interest.

Abstract

Introduction

Computed tomography perfusion (CTP) is increasingly employed in the diagnosis and management of ischaemic stroke but radiation dose can be significant and optimising contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) is challenging. This study aimed to quantify and optimise the balance between CNR as a surrogate for image quality and radiation dose.

Methods

A perspex head phantom with vials of dilute contrast agent was scanned using a Siemens Definition Flash 128-slice scanner. The CTP protocol exposure parameters were adjusted over 70–120 kVp and 150–285 mAs. Measurements were obtained for the average dose per slice, Hounsfield Units (HU) for iodinated contrast agent, and the image noise for background regions of perspex. The CNR was measured as a function of the volumetric CT dose index (CTDIvol) and kVp.

Results

A change from 120 to 80 kVp, achieved the same CNR with 60% reduction in dose. Alternatively, for the same dose, the change from 120 to 80 kVp improved CNR by +58%. A change from 80 to 70 kVp while operating at the same CNR, led to 13% reduction in dose. Alternatively, maintaining the same dose while changing from 80 to 70 kVp improved the CNR by +7%.

Conclusion

Lower beam energies achieved the same CNR with less dose, or improved CNR at the same dose. A reduction from 80 kVp to 70 kVp may be clinically useful to optimise CTP acquisitions.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.