Volume 59, Issue 3 pp. 379-385
Radiation Oncology—Original Article

Clinical equipoise: Protons and the child with craniopharyngioma

Ruth Conroy

Ruth Conroy

Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Lavier Gomes

Lavier Gomes

Medical Imaging, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Catherine Owen

Catherine Owen

Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Jeffrey Buchsbaum

Jeffrey Buchsbaum

Departments of Radiation Oncology, Paediatrics, and Neurological Surgery, Indiana University College of Arts and Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Bloomington, Indiana, USA

Department of Physics, IU Proton Therapy Center, Riley Hospital for Children, Indiana University Hospital, Bloomington, Indiana, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Verity Ahern

Corresponding Author

Verity Ahern

Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Correspondence

Dr Verity Ahern, Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, PO Box 533, Wentworthville, NSW 2145, Australia.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 09 December 2014
Citations: 14
R Conroy MBBS, FRCR; L Gomes MBBS; C Owen BSc (med Sci); J Buchsbaum MD, PhD, AM; V Ahern MBBS, FRANZCR.
Conflict of interest: No author declares any conflict of interest.

Abstract

Introduction

Childhood craniopharyngioma is a complex condition to manage. Survival figures are high but the potential for long-term morbidity is great. There is much debate regarding the best management for these tumours with increasing interest in the use of proton beam therapy. We have therefore reviewed our radiotherapy (RT) practice at Westmead Hospital and the literature regarding the use of protons for these children.

Methods

Three children have received fractionated stereotactic RT for craniopharyngioma at Westmead Hospital since 2007. Each RT plan was reviewed and additional organs at risk were contoured to enable comparison with published proton data.

Results

Planning target volume coverage was similar with all modalities: with the conformity index ranging from 0.70 to 0.78 in our patients compared with 0.50–0.84 in the published data. RT dose to temporal lobes, hippocampi and whole brain was also similar with protons and photons. Proton beam therapy may give lower dose to the Circle of Willis than stereotactic RT.

Conclusion

Currently there is no clear evidence that proton beam therapy will improve survival or reduce morbidity for children with craniopharyngioma. However, proton therapy has the potential to reduce RT dose to the Circle of Willis, which may reduce the risk of future cerebrovascular complications. We propose that more resources should be allocated to ensuring these patients are managed by experienced multidisciplinary teams through the continuum from diagnosis to long-term follow-up.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.