Volume 27, Issue 3 pp. 402-411
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Comparison of all renal replacement therapy modalities in terms of COVID-19 infection rate & mortality in the COVID-19 pandemic and importance of home therapies

Serdar Kahvecioglu

Serdar Kahvecioglu

Department of Nephrology, SBU. Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital, Bursa, Turkey

Search for more papers by this author
Nurhan Bilen

Corresponding Author

Nurhan Bilen

Department of Nephrology, SBU. Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital, Bursa, Turkey

Correspondence

Nurhan Bilen, Department of Nephrology, SBU Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital, Bursa, Turkey.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Huseyin Celik

Huseyin Celik

Department of Nephrology, Acıbadem Hospital, Bursa, Turkey

Search for more papers by this author
Cuma Bulent Gul

Cuma Bulent Gul

Department of Nephrology, SBU. Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital, Bursa, Turkey

Search for more papers by this author
Mehmet Usta

Mehmet Usta

Department of Nephrology, SBU City Training and Research Hospital, Bursa, Turkey

Search for more papers by this author
Nimet Aktaş

Nimet Aktaş

Department of Nephrology, SBU. Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital, Bursa, Turkey

Search for more papers by this author
Yusuf Bilen

Yusuf Bilen

Department of Haematology, SBU Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital, Bursa, Turkey

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 20 September 2022
Citations: 1

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to compare the infection rate and infection-related mortality among all renal replacement therapies during the COVID-19 pandemics.

Methods

One thousand three hundred thirty-six end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients who had applied for renal replacement therapy between March 2020 and January 2021 were included in the study. COVID-19 infection and mortality rates were compared between patient groups.

Results

The COVID-19 infection rate in the whole study group was 13.12% (n: 178). The highest infection rate was in the center hemodialysis, 16.33% (n: 139). There was no COVID-19 infection in home hemodialysis (HHD). Mortality rate was 2.87% (n: 39) in the whole cohort and 3.87% (n: 33) in center hemodialysis (CHD), 1.47% (n:5) in kidney transplant (Tx), and 0.81% (n: 1) in the peritoneal dialysis (PD) group. COVID-19 infection rate of home replacement therapy (HRT) (n: 39) patients was significantly lower than CHD (n: 139) (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The COVID-19 infection rate and mortality were significantly lower than those of CHD in all home-based modalities subgroups.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

All authors have no conflict of interests to declare.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

All data are stored in an Excel file by Prof. Dr. Serdar KAHVECIOGLU personal archive.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.