Management of the pancreatic stump after pancreaticoduodenectomy
Corresponding Author
Kit-Fai Lee
Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Author to whom all correspondence should be addressed.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Kit-Fai Lee
Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Author to whom all correspondence should be addressed.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
The aim of the present study was to review the current evidence in the management of the pancreatic stump after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). A literature search was conducted using the following key words: PD, Whipple's operation, pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ), pancreaticogastrostomy (PG), dunking, duct to mucosa (DTM) and pancreatic stent. Emphasis was made on randomized, controlled trials and meta-analyses. Simple ligation or occlusion of the pancreatic duct was abandoned due to a high complication rate. Most surgeons fashioned a PJ or PG to restore drainage of pancreatic juice. Dunking and DTM were the two major ways to construct anastomosis. The superiority of the binding technique still needs to be proved. However, Blumgart's modified DTM technique achieved a favourable outcome in some non-randomized trials. Pancreatic fistula was not decreased by internal stent, but an external stent might be helpful. No single type or technique of pancreaticoenteric anastomosis is able to demonstrate significant superiority to others. Similar controversy also occurs in the use of pancreatic stent. For the successful management of the pancreatic stump, no matter which type of anastomosis is employed, a meticulous surgical technique with optimization of blood supply to the anastomosis cannot be overemphasized.
References
- 1Whipple AO, Parson WB, Mullins CR. Treatment of carcinoma of the ampulla of vater. Ann. Surg. 1935; 102: 763–779.
- 2Traverso LW, Longmire WP Jr. Preservation of the pylorus in pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 1978; 146: 959–962.
- 3Strasberg SM, Drebin JA, Mokadam NA et al. Prospective trial of a blood supply-based technique of pancreaticojejunostomy: effect on anastomotic failure in the Whipple procedure. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2002; 194: 746–760.
- 4Goldsmith HS, Ghosh BC, Huvos AG. Ligation versus implanation of the pancreatic duct after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 1971; 132: 87–92.
- 5Tran K, Van Eijck C, Di Carlo V et al. Occlusion of the pancreatic duct versus pancreaticojejunostomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann. Surg. 2002; 236: 422–428.
- 6Mason GR, Freeark RJ. Current experience with pancreaticogastrostomy. Am. J. Surg. 1995; 169: 217–219.
- 7Amaud JP, Tuech JJ, Cervi C, Bergamaschi R. Pancreaticogastrostomy compared with pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Eur. J. Surg. 1999; 165: 357–362.
10.1080/110241599750006901 Google Scholar
- 8Takano S, Ito Y, Watanabe Y, Yokoyama T, Kubota N, Iwai S. Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy in reconstruction following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br. J. Surg. 2000; 87: 423–427.
- 9Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Maher MM et al. A prospective randomized trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann. Surg. 1995; 222: 580–592.
- 10Duffas JP, Suc B, Msika S et al. A controlled randomized multicenter trial of pancreatogastrostomy or pancreatojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy. Am. J. Surg. 2005; 189: 720–729.
- 11Bassi C, Falconi M, Molinari E et al. Reconstruction by pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreatectomy: results of a comparative study. Ann. Surg. 2005; 242: 767–773.
- 12Fernandez-Cruz L, Cosa R, Blanco L, Lopez-Boado MA, Astudillo E. Pancreatogastrostomy with gastric partition after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy versus conventional pancreatojejunostomy: a prospective randomized study. Ann. Surg. 2008; 248: 930–938.
- 13Shen Y, Jin W. Reconstruction by pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Gastroenterol. Res. Pract. 2012; 1–7.
- 14Greene BS, Loubeau JM, Peoples JB, Elliott DW. Are pancreatoenteric anastomosis improved by duct-to-mucosa sutures? Am. J. Surg. 1991; 161: 45–49.
- 15Z'graggen K, Uhl W, Friess H, Buchler MW. How to do a safe pancreatic anastomosis. J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Surg. 2002; 9: 733–737.
- 16Bassi C, Falconi M, Molinari E et al. Duct-to-mucosa versus end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy: results of a prospective randomized trial. Surgery 2003; 134: 766–771.
- 17Berger AC, Howard TJ, Kennedy EP et al. Does type of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy decrease rate of pancreatic fistula? A randomized, prospective, dual-institution trial. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2009; 208: 738–747.
- 18Peng SY, Mou YP, Liu YB et al. Binding pancreaticojejunostomy: 150 consecutive cases without leakage. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2003; 7: 898–901.
- 19Peng SY, Wang JW, Lau WY et al. Conventional versus binding panceaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann. Surg. 2007; 245: 692–698.
- 20Maggiori L, Sauvanet A, Nagarajan G, Dokmak S, Aussilhou B, Belghiti J. Binding versus conventional pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a case-matched study. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2010; 14: 1395–1400.
- 21Buc E, Flamein R, Golffier C et al. Peng's binding pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: aFrench prospective study. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2010; 14: 705–710.
- 22Casadei R, Ricci C, Silvestri S et al. Peng's binding pancreaticojejnostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. An Italian, prospective, dual-institution study. Pancreatology 2013; 13: 305–309.
- 23Peng SY, Wang JW, Hong F, Liu YB, Wang YF. Binding pancreaticoenteric anastomosis: from binding pancreaticojejunostomy to binding pancreaticogastrostomy. Updates Surg. 2011; 63: 69–74.
- 24Kleespies A, Rentsch M, Seeliger H, Albertsmeier M, Jauch KW, Bruns CJ. Blumgart anastomosis for pancreaticojejunostomy minimizes severe complications after pancreatic head resection. Br. J. Surg. 2009; 96: 741–750.
- 25Grobmyer SR, Kooby D, Blumgart LH, Hochwald SN. Novel pancreaticojejunostomy with a low rate of anastomotic failure-related complications. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2010; 210: 54–59.
- 26Mishra PK, Saluja SS, Gupta M, Rajalingam R, Pattnaik P. Blumgart's technique of pancreaticojejunostomy: an appraisal. Dig. Surg. 2011; 28: 281–287.
- 27Langrehr JM, Bahra M, Jacob D, Glanemann M, Neuhaus P. Prospective randomized comparison between a new mattress technique and Cattell (duct-to-mucosa) pancreaticojejunostomy for pancreatic resection. World J. Surg. 2005; 29: 1111–1119.
- 28Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA et al. Does pancreatic duct stenting decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2006; 10: 1280–1290.
- 29Zhou Y, Zhou Q, Li Z, Chen R. Internal pancreatic duct stent does not decrease pancreatic fistula rate after pancreatic resection: a meta-analysis. Am. J. Surg. 2013; 205: 718–725.
- 30Poon RT, Fan ST, Lo CM et al. External drainage of pancreatic duct with a stent to educe leakage rate of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann. Surg. 2007; 246: 425–433.
- 31Pessaux P, Sauvanet A, Mariette C et al. External pancreatic duct stent decreases pancreatic fistula rate after pancreaticoduodenectomy: prospective multicenter randomized trial. Ann. Surg. 2011; 253: 879–885.
- 32Kuroki T, Tajima Y, Kitasato A, Adachi T, Kanematsu T. Stenting versus non-stenting in pancreaticojejunostomy: a prospective study limited to a normal pancreas without fibrosis sorted by using dynamic MRI. Pancreas 2011; 40: 25–29.
- 33Motoi F, Egawa S, Rikiyama T, Katayose Y, Unno M. Randomized clinical trial of external stent drainage of the pancreatic duct to reduce post-operative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticojejunostomy. Br. J. Surg. 2012; 99: 524–531.
- 34Hong S, Wang H, Yang S, Yang K. External stent versus no stent for pancreaticojejunostomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2013; 17: 1516–1525.
- 35Kamoda Y, Fuujino Y, Matsumoto I, Shinzeki M, Sakai T, Kuroda Y. Usefulness of performing a pancreaticojejunostomy with an internal stent after a pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg. Today 2008; 38: 524–528.
- 36Tani M, Kawai M, Hirono S et al. A prospective randomized controlled trial of internal versus external drainage with pancreaticojejunostomy for pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am. J. Surg. 2010; 199: 759–764.
- 37Xiong JJ, Altaf K, Mukherjee R et al. Systemic review and meta-analysis of outcomes after intraoperative pancreatic duct stent placement during pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br. J. Surg. 2012; 99: 1050–1061.
- 38Kennedy EP, Yeo CJ. Dunking pancreaticojejunostomy versus duct-to-mucosa anastomosis. J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Sci. 2011; 18: 769–774.