Volume 62, Issue 4 pp. 1497-1532
Original Article

The Capital Market Effects of Centralizing Regulated Financial Information

GURPAL SRAN

GURPAL SRAN

New York University, Stern School of Business

Search for more papers by this author
MARCEL TUIJN

MARCEL TUIJN

Southern Methodist University, Cox School of Business

Search for more papers by this author
LAUREN VOLLON

Corresponding Author

LAUREN VOLLON

University of Notre Dame, Mendoza College of Business

Bocconi University

[email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 29 April 2024
Citations: 7
Accepted by Luzi Hail. We thank an anonymous reviewer, Phil Berger, Hans Christensen, Ed DeHaan, Eugene Fama, Douglas Hanna, Mark Maffett, Christian Leuz, Joe Lopez (discussant), Shirley Lu, Jean-Marie Meier, Stefan Nagel, Delphine Samuels, Haresh Sapra, Sorabh Tomar, Felix Vetter, Alminas Žaldokas (discussant), and workshop participants at the 2021 European Accounting Association Conference, 2021 Midwest Finance Association Conference, 2023 Lone Star Conference, Bocconi University, UC San Diego Rady School of Management, University of Chicago Booth School of Business, and Southern Methodist University Cox School of Business for comments and suggestions. We are indebted to Hans Christensen for data and details regarding various regulatory directives and regulated firms. We thank Jean-Marie Meier for providing updates on FSAP implementation dates. We also thank a regulator for details regarding the Belgian OAM. All errors are our own. An online appendix to this paper can be downloaded at https://www.chicagobooth.edu/jar-online-supplements.

ABSTRACT

We study the capital market effects of information centralization by exploiting the staggered implementation of digital storage and access platforms for regulated financial information (Officially Appointed Mechanisms, or OAMs) in the European Union. We find that the implementation of OAMs results in significant improvements in capital market liquidity, consistent with the notion that OAMs lower investors' processing costs. The findings are more pronounced when processing costs are high to begin with, that is, when firms (1) are small and receive low business press coverage and (2) have high levels of retail ownership. We then identify a mechanism through which centralization facilitates capital market effects: information spillovers. First, we find that liquidity improvements are larger when OAMs have features that easily allow investors to search for peer firm information. Second, liquidity improvements are larger for firms with a high share of industry peers operating on the same OAM and for firms with a high share of small, low-coverage peers on that OAM. Third, around the annual report release dates of peer firms, focal-firm liquidity improves and focal-peer stock return synchronicity increases. Overall, our evidence suggests that, even in a modern information age, information centralization improves capital market liquidity and facilitates the acquisition and use of peer firm information.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.