Volume 71, Issue 4 pp. 557-562
Original Article: Nutrition

Emotional Wellbeing in Parents of Children on Home Parenteral Nutrition

Mary Halsey

Corresponding Author

Mary Halsey

Department of Child Clinical Psychology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Mary Halsey, Department of Clinical Psychology, Wordsworth House, Mailpoint 133, University Hospital Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 7YD (e-mail: [email protected]).Search for more papers by this author
Kate Hodgson

Kate Hodgson

Department of Child Clinical Psychology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Rachel Russell

Rachel Russell

Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Anna Campion

Anna Campion

Department of Child Clinical Psychology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Catarina Machado

Catarina Machado

Department of Child Clinical Psychology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Robert M. Beattie

Robert M. Beattie

Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Akshay Batra

Akshay Batra

Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 11 May 2020
Citations: 8

Study Number: RHM CHI0958

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

ABSTRACT

Objectives:

Caring for a child on home parenteral nutrition (HPN) is stressful, and its emotional impact not fully appreciated. This study explored the emotional wellbeing and coping styles of parents and children on HPN.

Methods:

Questionnaire data were collected for parents of children (0–18 years) on HPN. Children 8 years and older completed the revised children's anxiety and depression scale. Parents completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Paediatric Inventory for Parents (PIP) and brief COPE.

Results:

A total of 14 children were included, 20 parents (13 females) and 4 children completed the survey. Parents had mean PIP difficulty and frequency score of 117.9 and 124, respectively, higher compared to parents of children with other chronic illness. PIP scores were significantly higher where children were also enterally tube fed (P < 0.05). Thirty-five per cent parents scored above clinical threshold on anxiety subscale of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and 30% in borderline range. On depression subscale 15% scored above clinical threshold range and 15% in borderline range. Mean anxiety and depression scores in parents of children with short bowel syndrome (11.8, 7.8) were significantly higher than those with neuromuscular disease (5.8, 1.6) P < 0.05. Coping styles differed according to health condition and whether child was enterally fed.

Conclusions:

There is a significant emotional impact of caring for a child on HPN, assessment and treatment of anxiety, depression, and stress should be a routine part of care. Individual needs of the child and parent need to be taken into account in providing the most appropriate psychological support.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.