Volume 108, Issue 11 pp. 1733-1738
Independent Papers

In vivo analysis of bacterial biofilm formation on facial plastic bioimplants

Sukit Christopher Malaisrie

Sukit Christopher Malaisrie

University of Maryland Medical School, the Division of Otolaryngology, Baltimore, Maryland

Search for more papers by this author
Sonya Malekzadeh MD

Sonya Malekzadeh MD

Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland Medical System, Baltimore, Maryland

Search for more papers by this author
John F. Biedlingmaier MD

Corresponding Author

John F. Biedlingmaier MD

Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland Medical System, Baltimore, Maryland

Director of Head & Neck Services, Maryland General Hospital, 827 Linden Avenue, Baltimore. MD 21201, U.S.A.Search for more papers by this author
First published: 20 October 2009
Citations: 28

Research funded by departmental funds and a grant from W. L. Gore and Associates, Inc.

Abstract

Objectives: This study examines the formation of biofilm on biomaterials commonly used in facial plastics and reconstruction including titanium, silicone, ionbombarded silicone (Ultrasil), e-PTFE (Gore-Tex), e-PTFE with silver/chlorhexidine (Gore-Tex Plus), and PHDPE (Medpor). Methods: These biomaterials were implanted subcutaneously in the dorsum of 11 guinea pigs after contamination with Staphylococcus aureus and examined with scanning electron microscopy after 7 days. Wounds were also inspected for infection and extrusion rates. Results: Results show biofilm formation on titanium, silicone, ion-bombarded silicone, e-PTFE, and PHDPE associated with high rates of extrusion and infection. Implants of e-PTFE with silver/chlorhexidine, on the other hand, appeared resistant to biofilm formation and demonstrated significantly lower rates of extrusion and infection. Conclusions: Contamination of bioimplants in vivo leads to formation of bacterial biofilm on the surface of the biomaterial, causing infection, pus formation, and extrusion. The authors hypothesize that the antiseptic agents impregnated in the biomaterial form a protective coat of silver, chlorhexidine, and inflammatory cells that inhibits initial bacterial adhesion to the biomaterial surface. Laryngoscope, 108:1733–1738, 1998

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.