Volume 17, Issue 7 pp. 894-903
Article

Development of two short measures for recovery and stress in sport

Anu Nässi

Anu Nässi

Faculty of Sport Science, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Alexander Ferrauti

Alexander Ferrauti

Faculty of Sport Science, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Tim Meyer

Tim Meyer

Institute of Sports and Preventive Medicine, University of Saarland, Saarbrücken, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Mark Pfeiffer

Mark Pfeiffer

Department of Theory and Practice of Sports, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Michael Kellmann

Corresponding Author

Michael Kellmann

Faculty of Sport Science, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany

School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

Correspondence: Michael Kellmann, Faculty of Sport Science, Ruhr University Bochum, Gesundheitscampus Nord 10, D-44801 Bochum, Germany. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
First published: 02 May 2017
Citations: 49

Abstract

The Acute Recovery and Stress Scale (ARSS) and the Short Recovery and Stress Scale were first established in German for the purposes of monitoring athletes’ current recovery-stress states in an economical and multidimensional manner. The aim of this paper is to document the development and initial validation of the English versions of these two psychometric monitoring tools. A total of 267 English-speaking athletes from a variety of team and individual sports participated in the study. The English versions demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency for both instruments (Cronbach α of. 74–.89). Furthermore, good model fit was found for the eight scales of the ARSS, matching the structure and results of the German counterparts. Correlations among and between the scales reciprocate the theoretical constructs of stress and recovery, supporting the construct validity of the scales. Correlation coefficients within stress and recovery ranged between rs = .29 and. 68. The correlations between stress and recovery varied between rs = −.29 and −.64. These constructs were further supported by correlations with the scores of the Recovery-Stress Questionnaire for Athletes, thereby showing convergent validity. The findings demonstrate initial validity and reliability of the two measures and reflect the results of the German versions. However, further research is needed before applying these scales in practical settings.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.