Volume 15, Issue s1 pp. s80-s91

Development and Validation of the GAIN Short Screener (GSS) for Internalizing, Externalizing and Substance Use Disorders and Crime/Violence Problems Among Adolescents and Adults

Michael L. Dennis PhD

Corresponding Author

Michael L. Dennis PhD

Chestnut Health Systems, Bloomington, Illinois

Address correspondence to Dr. Dennis, Chestnut Health Systems, 720 West Chestnut, Bloomington, IL 61701. E-mail: [email protected].Search for more papers by this author
Ya-Fen Chan PhD

Ya-Fen Chan PhD

Chestnut Health Systems, Bloomington, Illinois

Search for more papers by this author
Rodney R. Funk BS

Rodney R. Funk BS

Chestnut Health Systems, Bloomington, Illinois

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 18 February 2010
Citations: 353

The opinions are those of the author and do not reflect official positions of the contributing project directors or government.

Abstract

The Global Appraisal of Individual Needs (GAIN)1 is a 1–2 hour standardized biopsychosocial that integrates clinical and research assessment for people presenting to substance abuse treatment. The GAIN – Short Screener (GSS) is 3–5 minute screener to quickly identify those who would have a disorder based on the full 60–120 minute GAIN and triage the problem and kind of intervention they are likely to need along four dimensions (internalizing disorders, externalizing disorders, substance disorders, and crime/ violence). Data were collected from 6,177 adolescents and 1,805 adults as part of 77 studies in three dozen locations around the United States that used the GAIN. For both adolescents and adults the 20-item total disorder screener (TDScr) and its four 5-item sub-screeners (internalizing disorders, externalizing disorders, substance disorders, and crime/violence) has good internal consistency (alpha of .96 on total screener), is highly correlated (r—.84 to .94) with the 123-item longer scales in the full GAIN. The GSS also does well in terms of its receiver operator characteristics (90% or more under the curve in all analyses) and has clinical decision-making cut points with excellent sensitivity (90% or more) for identifying people with a disorder and excellent specificity (92% or more) for correctly ruling out people who did not have a disorder. The GSS has good potential as an efficient screener for identifying people with co-occurring disorders across multiple systems and routing them to the right services and more detailed assessments.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.