Volume 44, Issue 3 pp. 329-338

Pharmacodynamic Analysis of the Interaction between Tiagabine and Midazolam with an Allosteric Model That Incorporates Signal Transduction

Daniël M. Jonker

Daniël M. Jonker

Leiden/Amsterdam Center for Drug Research, Division of Pharmacology, Gorlaeus Laboratory, Leiden; and

Stichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland, Heemstede, The Netherlands; and

Search for more papers by this author
Dick A. C. Vermeij

Dick A. C. Vermeij

Stichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland, Heemstede, The Netherlands; and

Search for more papers by this author
Peter M. Edelbroek

Peter M. Edelbroek

Stichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland, Heemstede, The Netherlands; and

Search for more papers by this author
Rob A. Voskuyl

Rob A. Voskuyl

Leiden/Amsterdam Center for Drug Research, Division of Pharmacology, Gorlaeus Laboratory, Leiden; and

Stichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland, Heemstede, The Netherlands; and

Search for more papers by this author
Vladimir K. Piotrovsky

Vladimir K. Piotrovsky

Janssen Research Foundation, Beerse, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
Meindert Danhof

Meindert Danhof

Leiden/Amsterdam Center for Drug Research, Division of Pharmacology, Gorlaeus Laboratory, Leiden; and

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 07 March 2003
Citations: 9
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Prof. Dr. M. Danhof at Leiden/Amsterdam Center for Drug Research, Division of Pharmacology, Leiden University, Gorlaeus Laboratory, P.O. Box 9502, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Summary: Purpose: The objective of this study was to characterize quantitatively the pharmacodynamic interaction between midazolam (MDL), an allosteric modulator of the γ-aminobutyric acid subtype A (GABAA) receptor, and tiagabine (TGB), an inhibitor of synaptic GABA uptake.

Methods: The in vivo concentration–response relation of TGB was determined through pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling. Rats received a single intravenous dose of 10 mg/kg TGB in the absence and the presence of a steady-state plasma concentration of MDL. The EEG response in the 11.5- to 30-Hz frequency band was used as the pharmacodynamic end point.

Results: Infusion of MDL resulted in a mean steady-state plasma concentration of 66 ± 3 ng/ml. A significant pharmacokinetic interaction with TGB was observed. MDL inhibited TGB clearance by 20 ± 7 ml/min/kg from the original value of 89 ± 6 ml/min/kg. However, no changes in plasma protein binding of both drugs were observed. The concentration–EEG relation of TGB was described by the sigmoid-Emax model. The pharmacodynamic parameter estimates of TGB were: Emax = 327 ± 10 μV, EC50 = 392 ± 20 ng/ml, and nH = 3.1 ± 0.3. These values were not significantly different in the presence of MDL. Factors that may explain the lack of synergism were identified by a mechanism-based interaction model that separates the receptor activation from the signal-transduction process. High efficiency of signal transduction and the presence of a baseline response were shown to diminish the degree of synergism.

Conclusions: We conclude that the in vivo pharmacodynamic interaction between MDL and TGB is additive rather than synergistic. This strongly suggests that allosteric modulation of the antiseizure activity of a GAT-1 inhibitor by a benzodiazepine does not offer a therapeutic advantage.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

click me