Volume 26, Issue 1p2 pp. 264-267

Bachmann's Bundle Versus Right Atrial Appendage Capture

STEVEN J. BAILIN

STEVEN J. BAILIN

Iowa Heart Center, Des Moines, Iowa

Search for more papers by this author
CHRISTIAN MACHADO

CHRISTIAN MACHADO

Providence Hospitals and Medical Center, Southfield, Michigan

Search for more papers by this author
EMMANUEL NSAH

EMMANUEL NSAH

Peninsula Regional Medical Center, Salisbury, Maryland

Search for more papers by this author
SETH WORLEY

SETH WORLEY

Lancaster Heart Foundation, Lancaster, Pennsylvania

Search for more papers by this author
MARK KREMERS

MARK KREMERS

Mid Carolina Cardiology, Charlotte, North Carolina, and

Search for more papers by this author
J. RUSSELL BAILEY

J. RUSSELL BAILEY

Mid Carolina Cardiology, Charlotte, North Carolina, and

Search for more papers by this author
LAURA HILDEBRAND

LAURA HILDEBRAND

St. Jude Medical, Sylmar, California

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 28 March 2003
Citations: 4
Address for reprints: Steven J. Bailin, M.D., Iowa Heart Center, 411 Laurel, Suite 1250, Des Moines, IA 50314. Fax: (515) 284-0837; e-mail: [email protected]

Supported in part by St. Jude Medical, Sylmar, California, USA.

Abstract

BAILIN, S.J., et al .: Bachmann's Bundle Versus Right Atrial Appendage Capture. The tissue in the high intraatrial septum in the region of Bachmann's Bundle (BB) exhibits electrophysiological properties that differ from the right atrial appendage (RAA). As BB pacing emerges as an alternative to RAA pacing, the feasibility of using automatic capture recognition technology in this location should be examined. At implant, active-fixation leads were consecutively placed in the RAA, then the BB in 18 patients (55.5% men, mean age 77.1 ± 9.1 ). There was no significant difference between BB and RAA in the average capture threshold (1.12 vs 1.77 V, P = 0.09), sensing threshold (3.85 vs 3.69 mV, P = 0.84), impedance (508 vs 529 Ohms, P = 0.64), evoked response (1.78 vs 1.67 mV, P = 0.83), and polarization (0.41 vs 0.46 mV, P = 0.84) between. The difference in tissue characteristics was not associated with a different evoked response measured by the ventricular capture recognition algorithm. Based on the analogous evoked response and polarization values, capture recognition technology designed for the atrium will most likely be applicable at both pacing sites. (PACE 2003; 26[Pt. II]:264–267)

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.