Volume 120, Issue 2 pp. 296-303

Tandem transplants with different high-dose regimens improve the complete remission rates in multiple myeloma. Results of a Grupo Español de Síndromes Linfoproliferativos/Trasplante Autólogo de Médula Ósea phase II trial

Juan José Lahuerta

Juan José Lahuerta

From the Hematology Departments of Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid,

Search for more papers by this author
Carlos Grande

Carlos Grande

From the Hematology Departments of Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid,

Search for more papers by this author
Joaquín Martínez-Lopez

Joaquín Martínez-Lopez

From the Hematology Departments of Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid,

Search for more papers by this author
Javier De La Serna

Javier De La Serna

From the Hematology Departments of Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid,

Search for more papers by this author
Rosa Toscano

Rosa Toscano

From the Hematology Departments of Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid,

Search for more papers by this author
María Cruz Ortiz

María Cruz Ortiz

From the Hematology Departments of Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid,

Search for more papers by this author
Santiago Larregla

Santiago Larregla

From the Hematology Departments of Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid,

Search for more papers by this author
Eulogio Conde

Eulogio Conde

Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander,

Search for more papers by this author
Andrés Insunza

Andrés Insunza

Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander,

Search for more papers by this author
José David Gonzalez-San Miguel

José David Gonzalez-San Miguel

Hospital Insular, Las Palmas,

Search for more papers by this author
Juan Bargay

Juan Bargay

Hospital Son Dureta, Palma de Mallorca,

Search for more papers by this author
Rafael Cabrera

Rafael Cabrera

Hospital Puerta de Hierro, Madrid,

Search for more papers by this author
Juan Carlos García-Ruiz

Juan Carlos García-Ruiz

Hospital de Cruces, Bilbao,

Search for more papers by this author
Carmen Albó

Carmen Albó

Hospital Xeral, Vigo,

Search for more papers by this author
Luis García-Alonso

Luis García-Alonso

Hospital General de Getafe,

Search for more papers by this author
Fernando Solano

Fernando Solano

Hospital Ntra Sra del Prado, Talavera de la Reina,

Search for more papers by this author
Pilar Vivancos

Pilar Vivancos

Clínica Corachan, Barcelona,

Search for more papers by this author
Angel León

Angel León

Hospital General de Jerez de la Frontera, and

Search for more papers by this author
Jesús San Miguel

Jesús San Miguel

Hospital Clínico Universitario, Salamanca, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
for the Grupo Español de Síndromes Linfoproliferativos/Trasplante Autólogo de Médula Ósea

for the Grupo Español de Síndromes Linfoproliferativos/Trasplante Autólogo de Médula Ósea

From the Hematology Departments of Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid,

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 24 January 2003
Citations: 31
Juan José Lahuerta, Servicio de Hematología, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Avenue De Córdoba s/n, 28041 Madrid, Spain. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Summary. Between 1994 and 1999, 88 multiple myeloma (MM) patients were included in a phase II study to evaluate a tandem autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) programme. The first was conditioned with melphalan 200 mg/m2 (MEL200-ASCT1), and the second with cyclophosphamide, etoposide and BCNU (CBV-ASCT2). All patients were in response after MEL200-ASCT1. A control group of MM patients with response to a single ASCT was selected to compare outcomes. After MEL200-ASCT1, 26 patients (30%) achieved complete remission (CR). Of the remaining 48 evaluable patients, 16 (33%) achieved CR with CBV-ASCT2. The final CR rate was 48%. The 5-year survival (OS) was 55%[95% confidence interval (CI) 43–67%] while the event-free survival (EFS) was 28% (95% CI 15–39%). CR status after CBV-ASCT2 was the most important prognostic factor for OS and EFS (P = 0·00001), although no differences in outcomes were detected when the patients in CR after MEL200-ASCT1 were compared with those who obtained CR after CBV-ASCT2. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed improved OS and EFS for the tandem series as compared with the control series treated with a single MEL200-ASCT. However, in a stratified comparison by response, there were no prognostic differences between tandem patients and control patients treated with a single ASCT. In summary, our study suggests that the benefit of a second high-dose therapy course depends on its capacity to result in CR for MM patients who have not attained CR after ASCT1.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.