Volume 119, Issue 4 pp. 970-975

Novel flow-cytometric analysis based on BCD5+ subpopulations for the evaluation of minimal residual disease in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia

Karim Maloum

Karim Maloum

Service d'Hématologie Biologique,

Search for more papers by this author
Laurent Sutton

Laurent Sutton

Service d'Hématologie Clinique,

Search for more papers by this author
Sylvie Baudet

Sylvie Baudet

Service d'Hématologie Biologique,

Search for more papers by this author
Caroline Laurent

Caroline Laurent

Laboratoire d'Immunologie cellulaire, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière,

Search for more papers by this author
Patrick Bonnemye

Patrick Bonnemye

Laboratoire d'Immunologie cellulaire, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière,

Search for more papers by this author
Christian Magnac

Christian Magnac

Unité d'Immuno-Hématologie et d'Immuno-Pathologie, Institut Pasteur, and

Search for more papers by this author
Hélène Merle-Béral

Hélène Merle-Béral

Service d'Hématologie Biologique,

Unité Claude Bernard C20, Paris, France

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 11 December 2002
Citations: 19
Karim Maloum, MD, PhD, Service d'Hématologie Biologique, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47 Bd de l'Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, 75013 Paris, France. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Summary. We describe a new flow-cytometric analysis using quadruple labelling with anti-CD19, CD20, CD5, CD79b monoclonal antibodies and sequential gating. We determined a novel criteria defined by BCD5+CD79b–/low/total BCD5+ cells ratio (BCD5+R), and compared it with the previous definition of phenotypic remission, based on CD19+CD5+ coexpression, and with complementarity-determining region 3 polymerase chain reaction (CDR3 PCR) and clonotypic PCR (cPCR). A series of 54 peripheral blood samples from 21 chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) patients in complete haematological remission and a series of 16 from normal volunteers were analysed. In normal controls, the BCD5+R was always < 0·2. The sensitivity of the BCD5+R was 1 × 10−4vs 5 × 10−2 for CDR3 PCR and 1 × 10−5 for cPCR. Among the 54 CLL samples, 35 had a BCD5+R < 0·2 and showed polyclonal CDR3 PCR, whereas the cPCR was positive in 12 out of 20 tested. In the remaining 19 samples, BCD5+R was > 0·2, CDR3 PCR was monoclonal in 16 out of 19 and cPCR positive in 14 out 14 tested, including one out of three samples with polyclonal CDR3 amplification. Even though cPCR remains the most sensitive method to evaluate MRD, this new, sensitive and specific flow cytometric parameter, the BCD5+R, is more suitable than CDR3 PCR for routine clinical MRD assessment in CLL.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.