Volume 14, Issue 2 pp. 139-146

Are lipid-dependent indicators of cardiovascular risk affected by renal transplantation?

Antonio Schena

Antonio Schena

Department of Emergency and Organ Transplants (DETO), Division of Nephrology, University of Bari and

Search for more papers by this author
Salvatore Di Paolo

Salvatore Di Paolo

Department of Emergency and Organ Transplants (DETO), Division of Nephrology, University of Bari and

Search for more papers by this author
Luigi F Morrone

Luigi F Morrone

Department of Emergency and Organ Transplants (DETO), Division of Nephrology, University of Bari and

Search for more papers by this author
Francesco Resta

Francesco Resta

Department of Internal Medicine, Immunology and Infectious Diseases, University of Bari, Policlinico, Piazza G. Cesare, 11-70124 Bari, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Giovanni Stallone

Giovanni Stallone

Department of Emergency and Organ Transplants (DETO), Division of Nephrology, University of Bari and

Search for more papers by this author
F Paolo Schena

F Paolo Schena

Department of Emergency and Organ Transplants (DETO), Division of Nephrology, University of Bari and

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 25 December 2001
Citations: 7
Corresponding author: Professor FP Schena, MD, DETO-Division of Nephrology, University of Bari-Policlinico, Piazza Giulio Cesare, 11, 70124 Bari, Italy. Tel: +39 080 5592237; fax: +39 080 5575710; e-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Hyperlipoproteinemia has been reported to frequently occur in kidney transplanted patients, thus possibly explaining, at least in part, the increased incidence of cardiovascular disease in this population. To evaluate the impact of renal transplantation (Tx), and related immunosuppressive therapy, on plasma lipoprotein and Lp(a) profile, we selected a cohort of kidney transplanted patients (36 M/14 F; age 33.8±12.0 yr, range 13–62) lacking significant causes of hyperlipidemia. All patients received a triple immunosuppressive regimen and showed a stable renal function after Tx (plasma creatinine: 1.36±0.35 mg/dL). One year after Tx, we found a significant increase of total cholesterol (TC), LDL, HDL, ApoB and ApoA-I (p<0.005), while plasma triglyceride levels remained unmodified. Lp(a) plasma levels after Tx were within the normal range and displayed a significant inverse relationship with apo(a) size. Noteworthy, LDL/HDL ratio and ApoB/ApoA-I ratio in kidney transplanted patients were almost superimposable with those of normal controls. Specifically, LDL/HDL ratio significantly decreased in 64% of patients after Tx, due to a prevalent increase of HDL, and was associated with a moderate amelioration of plasma TG. In a multiple linear regression model, post-Tx HDL level was significantly related to recipient's age, gender, BMI and cyclosporine (CyA) trough levels (Adj-R2=0.35, p=0.0002), with gender and CyA trough levels being the better predictors of HDL. In conclusion, immunosuppressive regimens, in themselves, do not appear to significantly increase the atherogenic risk related to lipoproteins. Rather, other factors can affect the lipoprotein profile and its vascular effects in renal transplant recipients.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.