Volume 6, Issue 3 pp. 227-234
Original Research

Ultrasound Examination of the Serratus Anterior During Scapular Protraction in Asymptomatic Individuals: Reliability and Changes With Contraction

Nancy R. Talbott PhD, MS, PT

Corresponding Author

Nancy R. Talbott PhD, MS, PT

Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Allied Health Sciences, University of Cincinnati, PO Box 670394, Cincinnati, OH, 45267-0394

Disclosure: nothing to disclose

Address correspondence to N.R.T.Search for more papers by this author
Dexter W. Witt DPT, DHS, OCS, FAAOMPT

Dexter W. Witt DPT, DHS, OCS, FAAOMPT

Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Allied Health Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH

Disclosure: nothing to disclose

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 18 September 2013
Citations: 17

Abstract

Objective

To determine the ability of 2 clinicians to reliably measure the thickness of the serratus anterior (SA) muscle using ultrasound during scapular protraction and to determine whether that thickness changes during activation of the SA.

Design

A cross-sectional observational study.

Setting

An outpatient biomechanical laboratory.

Participants

Twenty healthy, asymptomatic adults between the ages of 23 and 28 years.

Methods

Ultrasound imaging measurements were recorded during 3 conditions: (1) with the subject in a side-lying position and resting in a supported position of 90° of shoulder flexion; (2) with the subject in a side-lying position and the shoulder in 90° of shoulder flexion and actively protracting; and (3) with the subject in a side-lying position and the shoulder in 90° of shoulder flexion while holding the protracted position against 15 lb of force.

Main Outcome Measurements

Reproducibility was examined with use of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and standard error of measurements. The thickness of the SA muscle measured during each condition was compared.

Results

Intratester and intertester ICC values were high. Ranges for ICCs were 0.892-0.979 for intratester reliability within a session, 0.900-0.912 for intratester reliability between sessions, and 0.929-0.939 for intertester reliability. Statistically significant differences in the thickness of the SA were found between the rest condition and the hold with resistance condition but not between the rest condition and the active hold condition.

Conclusion

Findings of this study document the high reliability of ultrasound imaging in determining SA muscle thickness and thickness changes at rest and during contraction of the SA. Clinicians should be aware that resistance may need to be added to active scapular protraction in a side-lying position to produce a significant change in SA thickness from the rest position. This information can be used by clinicians who assess the SA and treat scapular dysfunction when activation or facilitation of the SA is required.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.