Volume 37, Issue 7 pp. 965-972
Original Article

Self-reported rates of interpersonal conflict vary as a function of questionnaire format: Why age-related trends in disagreement (and other events) may not be what they seem

Shrija Dirghangi

Corresponding Author

Shrija Dirghangi

Florida Atlantic University, United States

Corresponding authors. Department of Psychology, Florida Atlantic University, 777 Glades Road, Boca Raton, FL 33431, United States.Search for more papers by this author
Brett Laursen

Corresponding Author

Brett Laursen

Florida Atlantic University, United States

Corresponding authors. Department of Psychology, Florida Atlantic University, 777 Glades Road, Boca Raton, FL 33431, United States.Search for more papers by this author
Justin Puder

Justin Puder

Auburn University, United States

Search for more papers by this author
David F. Bjorklund

David F. Bjorklund

Florida Atlantic University, United States

Search for more papers by this author
Dawn DeLay

Dawn DeLay

Arizona State University, United States

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 01 August 2014
Citations: 4

ABSTRACT

Two studies examine whether self-reports of interpersonal conflict differ as a function of how the question is asked. In Study 1, 56 U.S. college students (M = 20.7 years) completed different versions of a questionnaire, four times, at one week intervals. Participants reported more conflicts with the aid of memory prompts than without, an effect that was especially strong when questions focused on events from the previous day. In Study 2, 123 middle-school students (M = 11.08 years) and 128 primary school students (M = 8.2 years) from the same region completed one of two questionnaires describing conflict during the previous day. Children reported more conflicts with memory prompts than without. The effect was twice as strong for younger children than older children. The findings suggest that increases in reports of conflict across the transition into adolescence may be due to improvements in the ability to recall and recount events in the absence of memory cues.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.