Self-reported rates of interpersonal conflict vary as a function of questionnaire format: Why age-related trends in disagreement (and other events) may not be what they seem
Corresponding Author
Shrija Dirghangi
Florida Atlantic University, United States
Corresponding authors. Department of Psychology, Florida Atlantic University, 777 Glades Road, Boca Raton, FL 33431, United States.Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Brett Laursen
Florida Atlantic University, United States
Corresponding authors. Department of Psychology, Florida Atlantic University, 777 Glades Road, Boca Raton, FL 33431, United States.Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Shrija Dirghangi
Florida Atlantic University, United States
Corresponding authors. Department of Psychology, Florida Atlantic University, 777 Glades Road, Boca Raton, FL 33431, United States.Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Brett Laursen
Florida Atlantic University, United States
Corresponding authors. Department of Psychology, Florida Atlantic University, 777 Glades Road, Boca Raton, FL 33431, United States.Search for more papers by this authorABSTRACT
Two studies examine whether self-reports of interpersonal conflict differ as a function of how the question is asked. In Study 1, 56 U.S. college students (M = 20.7 years) completed different versions of a questionnaire, four times, at one week intervals. Participants reported more conflicts with the aid of memory prompts than without, an effect that was especially strong when questions focused on events from the previous day. In Study 2, 123 middle-school students (M = 11.08 years) and 128 primary school students (M = 8.2 years) from the same region completed one of two questionnaires describing conflict during the previous day. Children reported more conflicts with memory prompts than without. The effect was twice as strong for younger children than older children. The findings suggest that increases in reports of conflict across the transition into adolescence may be due to improvements in the ability to recall and recount events in the absence of memory cues.
References
- R.E. Adams, B. Laursen. The correlates of conflict: disagreement is not necessarily detrimental. Journal of Family Psychology. 2007; 21 3: 445–458.
- P.A. Aloise-Young, K.M. Hennigan. Self-image, the smoker stereotype and cigarette smoking: developmental patterns from fifth through eighth grade. Journal of Adolescence. 1996; 19 2: 163–177.
- R.F. Belli, N. Schwarz, E. Singer, J. Talarico. Decomposition can harm the accuracy of behavioral frequency reports. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2000; 14 4: 295–308.
10.1002/1099-0720(200007/08)14:4<295::AID-ACP646>3.0.CO;2-1 Google Scholar
- D.F. Bjorklund, C. Dukes, R.D. Brown, M.L. Courage, N. Cowan. The development of memory strategies. In The development of memory in infancy and childhood. Hove, United Kingdom: Psychology Press. 2009, 145–175.
- M. Bruck, S.J. Ceci. The suggestibility of children's memory. Annual Review of Psychology. 1999; 50 1: 419–439.
- W.J. Burk, J. Denissen, M.D. Van Doorn, S.J. Branje, B. Laursen. The vicissitudes of conflict measurement: stability and reliability in the frequency of disagreements. European Psychologist. 2009; 14 2: 153–159.
- S. Burton, E. Blair. Task conditions, response formulation processes, and response accuracy for behavioral frequency questions in surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly. 1991; 55 1: 50–79.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Youth risk behavior survey. 1989, Available at www.cdc.gov/yrbs, Accessed 05.05.14
- W.A. Collins, B. Laursen, C.U. Shantz, W.W. Hartup. Conflict and the transition to adolescence. In Conflict in child and adolescent development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1992, 216–241.
- A.J. Fuligni. Authority, autonomy, and parent–adolescent conflict and cohesion: a study of adolescents from Mexican, Chinese, Filipino, and European backgrounds. Developmental Psychology. 1998; 34 4: 782–792.
- N.L. Galambos, D.M. Almeida. Does parent–adolescent conflict increase in early adolescence?. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 1992; 54 4: 737–747.
10.2307/353157 Google Scholar
- N.A. Gonzales, A.M. Cauce, C.A. Mason. Interobserver agreement in the assessment of parental behavior and parent–adolescent conflict: African American mothers, daughters, and independent observers. Child Development. 1996; 67 4: 1483–1498.
- L.A. Jensen-Campbell, W.G. Graziano. Agreeableness as a moderator of interpersonal conflict. Journal of Personality. 2001; 69 2: 323–362.
- L. Johnston, P. O'Malley, J. Bachman. National trends in drug use and related factors among American high school students and young adults, 1975–1986. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. 1987 (DHHS Publication No. ADM87–1535);:.
- B. Knäuper, N. Schwarz, D.C. Park. Frequency reports across age groups: differential effects of frequency scales. Journal of Official Statistics. 2004; 20 1: 91–96.
- B. Laursen. Conflict and social interaction in adolescent relationships. Journal of Research on Adolescence. 1995; 5 1: 55–70.
- B. Laursen, W.A. Collins. Interpersonal conflict during adolescence. Psychological Bulletin. 1994; 115 2: 197–209.
- B. Laursen, K.C. Coy, W.A. Collins. Reconsidering changes in parent–child conflict across adolescence: a meta-analysis. Child Development. 1998; 69 3: 817–832.
- B. Laursen, J. Denissen, D.F. Bjorklund, B. Laursen, T.D. Little, N.A. Card. Event frequency measurement. In Handbook of developmental research methods. New York: Guilford. 2012, 66–81.
- B. Laursen, A.L. Koplas. What's important about important conflicts? Adolescents' perceptions of daily disagreements. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly. 1995; 41 4: 536–553.
- B. Laursen, G. Pursell, K.H. Rubin, W.M. Bukowski, B. Laursen. Conflict in peer relationships. In Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups. New York: Guilford. 2009, 267–286.
- J.L. Malfetti, P.R. Rose, N.A. DeKorp, C.E. Basch. The Young Driver Attitude Scale. The development and field-testing of an instrument to measure young driver risk-taking attitudes. New York: New York Teachers College, Columbia University. 1989.
- G. Menon. Are the parts better than the whole? The effects of decompositional questions on judgments of frequent behaviors. Journal of Marketing Research. 1997; 34: 335–346.
- G. Menon, P. Raghubir, N. Schwarz. Behavioral frequency judgments: an accessibility-diagnosticity framework. Journal of Consumer Research. 1995; 22: 212–228.
- G. Menon, E.A. Yorkston, A.A. Stone, J.S. Turkkan, C.A. Bachrach, J.B. Jobe, H.S. Kurtzman, V.S. Cain. The use of memory and contextual cues in the formation of behavioral frequency judgments. In The science of self-report: Implications for research and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. 2000, 63–79.
- R. Montemayor, E. Hanson. A naturalistic view of conflict between adolescents and their parents and siblings. Journal of Early Adolescence. 1985; 5 1: 23–30.
10.1177/0272431685051003 Google Scholar
- E.R. Oetting, F. Beauvais, R.W. Edwards. The American drug and alcohol survey. Fort Collins, CO: Rocky Mountain Behavioral Science Institute. 1985.
- D.F. Roberts, U.G. Foehr, V.J. Rideout, M. Brodie. Kids and media @ the new millennium. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation. 1999.
- T.N. Robinson. Television viewing and childhood obesity. Pediatric Clinics of North America. 2001; 48 4: 1017–1025.
- D.C. Rubin, A.D. Baddeley. Telescoping is not time compression: a model. Memory & Cognition. 1989; 17 6: 653–661.
- H. Schuman, S. Presser. Questions and answers in attitude surveys: Experiments in question form, wording, and context. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 1981.
- N. Schwarz. Self-reports: how the questions shape the answers. American Psychologist. 1999; 54: 93–105.
- N. Schwarz, D. Oyserman. Asking questions about behavior: cognition, communication, and questionnaire construction. American Journal of Evaluation. 2001; 22: 127–160.
- C. Shantz. Conflicts and conundrums in child development Newsletter of the Division on Developmental Psychology (Div. 7, APA). 1984, Fall; 18–28
- J.G. Smetana, M. Gunnar. Concepts of self and social convention: adolescents' and parents' reasoning about hypothetical and actual family conflicts. In 21st Minnesota symposium on child psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 1988, 79–122.
- J.G. Smetana, C. Daddis, S.S. Chuang. “Clean your room!” A longitudinal investigation of adolescent–parent conflict and conflict resolution in middle-class African American families. Journal of Adolescent Research. 2003; 18 6: 631–650.
- L. Steinberg. We know some things: parent–adolescent relationships in retrospect and prospect. Journal of Research on Adolescence. 2001; 11 1: 1–19.
- K. Subrahmanyam, P. Greenfield, R. Kraut, E. Gross. The impact of computer use on children's and adolescents' development. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. 2001; 22 1: 7–30.
- S. Sudman, N. Schwarz. Contributions of cognitive psychology to advertising research. Journal of Advertising Research. 1989; 29: 43–53.
- P. Winkielman, B. Knauper, N. Schwarz. Looking back at anger: reference periods change the interpretation of emotion frequency questions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1998; 75: 719–728.
- D.B. Wright, G.D. Gaskell, C.A. O'Muricheartaigh. How much is ‘quite a bit’? Mapping between numerical values and vague quantifiers. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 1994; 8: 479–496.
- J. Yau, J. Smetana. Adolescent–parent conflict in Hong Kong and Shenzhen: a comparison of youth in two cultural contexts. International Journal of Behavioral Development. 2003; 27 3: 201–211.