Volume 38, Issue 5 1 pp. 1077-1083
Article

Assessing Patterns of Practice of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Breast Cancer in Latin America

Sergio A. Acuna

Sergio A. Acuna

Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Institute of Health Policy, Management and Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Fernando A. Angarita

Fernando A. Angarita

Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Toronto General Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Jaime Escallon

Corresponding Author

Jaime Escallon

Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Department of Surgery, Marvelle Koffler Breast Centre, Mount Sinai Hospital, Room 1266, 600 University Avenue, M5G 1X5 Toronto, ON, Canada

Tel.: +1-416-856-5163, Fax: +1-416-586-8847, [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
First published: 05 December 2013
Citations: 6

Electronic supplementary material: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00268-013-2382-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Abstract

Introduction

There is a lack information regarding how sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for breast cancer is carried out today in developing countries and how it was adapted. To rectify this situation we performed a pattern-of-practice survey amongst practicing surgeons in Latin America (LA).

Methods

A survey was developed to assess current surgical practice in breast cancer, use of SLNB, limitations to the implementation, training, technique variations, and observed adverse events. A total of 30 surgical associations and breast surgery societies in 18 Latin American countries were invited to participate. Surveys were distributed among member of these associations and 76.7 % of those contacted answered the survey. Responses were limited only to those who reported treating breast cancer patients.

Results

A total of 463 surgeons who manage breast cancer responded. Over 53 % of surgeons do not have sub-specialty training. Only 47.7 % have a high-volume case load, of which 87.8 % routinely perform SLNB. The main limitations perceived to the implementation of SLNB were a lack of resources/equipment (48 %) and training opportunities (33 %). Over 60 % reported that fewer than half of their patients were eligible for SLNB and 67.8 % reported that they were involved in teaching this technique to residents.

Conclusions

A significant proportion of surgeons that treat breast cancer cases in LA have not had sub-specialty training or manage a low volume of cases. Among those surgeons with a high-volume caseload, SLNB is routinely performed. SLNB training during residency represents an opportunity for improvement in the region.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.