Volume 36, Issue 6 1 pp. 1361-1367
Article

Heat Production, Nerve Function, and Morphology following Nerve Close Dissection with Surgical Instruments

Johan Carlander

Corresponding Author

Johan Carlander

Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden

Department of Surgery, Centrallasarettet, Västerås, Sweden

[email protected]Search for more papers by this author
C. Koch

C. Koch

Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Braunschweig, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
L. Brudin

L. Brudin

Department of Clinical Physiology, Kalmar Hospital, Kalmar, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
C. Nordborg

C. Nordborg

Department of Pathology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
O. Gimm

O. Gimm

Department of Surgery, County Council of Östergötland, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
K. Johansson

K. Johansson

Department of Surgery, County Council of Östergötland, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden

Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 25 February 2012
Citations: 20

Abstract

Background

The aim of the present study was to compare an ultrasonically activated instrument (US), monopolar electrosurgery, and bipolar electrosurgery (ES) with respect to heat production, nerve function, and nerve morphology following in vivo application.

Materials and methods

The biceps femoris muscle of anesthetized rats was cut in a standardized manner longitudinally 1 mm adjacent to the sciatic nerve using US shears, a monopolar ES knife, or a bipolar ES scissors. Activation time and temperature were recorded continuously within 1–4 mm of the activation site ipsilateral and contralateral to the nerve with two thermoelectric microsensors. Temperature rise and time delay of reaching the temperature maximum, as an expression of heat spread within tissue, maximum temperature, and thermal dose (equivalent time of exposure at 43°C) were measured and calculated. A total of 49 functional experiments were conducted. The electromyographic (EMG) potential was recorded distally. Nerve dysfunction was defined as more than 10% loss of the evoked EMG amplitude. Forty-eight nerves were coded and submitted to blind histopathological examination, and morphological damage was graded on a 4-grade scale.

Results

The maximum temperature elevation and the thermal dose were significantly higher for the bipolar ES compared with the US instrument (p = 0.024, p = 0.049), and with much less variation of results for the US instrument. The monopolar ES maximum temperature and thermal dose were lower, but a very large variation occurred, probably as a result of more random electrical spread to the ground electrode and muscle motion artifacts. Functional loss was least common in the US group—without being significant—compared to bipolar and monopolar ES. Moderate and severe morphological damage was significantly less common in the US group than in the monopolar ES group (p = 0.041). We found no statistically significant correlation between the highest temperatures and the degree of morphological damage or functional loss.

Conclusions

The temperature elevation depends strongly on the distance to the activated instrument. The bipolar ES scissors generates a higher maximum temperature and thermal dose with a greater variation in than the US. Functional loss and severe morphological damage were uncommon in all groups.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.