Diagnostic Accuracy of CT and Ultrasonography for Evaluating Metastatic Cervical Lymph Nodes in Patients with Thyroid Cancer
Ji Eun Ahn
Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 388-1 Poongnap-2dong, Songpa-gu, 138-736 Seoul, Korea
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Jeong Hyun Lee
Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 388-1 Poongnap-2dong, Songpa-gu, 138-736 Seoul, Korea
[email protected]Search for more papers by this authorJong Sook Yi
University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 388-1 Poongnap-2dong, Songpa-gu, 138-736 Seoul, Korea
Search for more papers by this authorYoung Ki Shong
Department of Endocrinology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 388-1 Poongnap-2dong, Songpa-gu, 138-736 Seoul, Korea
Search for more papers by this authorSeok Joon Hong
Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 388-1 Poongnap-2dong, Songpa-gu, 138-736 Seoul, Korea
Search for more papers by this authorDeok Hee Lee
Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 388-1 Poongnap-2dong, Songpa-gu, 138-736 Seoul, Korea
Search for more papers by this authorChoong Gon Choi
Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 388-1 Poongnap-2dong, Songpa-gu, 138-736 Seoul, Korea
Search for more papers by this authorSang Joon Kim
Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 388-1 Poongnap-2dong, Songpa-gu, 138-736 Seoul, Korea
Search for more papers by this authorJi Eun Ahn
Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 388-1 Poongnap-2dong, Songpa-gu, 138-736 Seoul, Korea
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Jeong Hyun Lee
Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 388-1 Poongnap-2dong, Songpa-gu, 138-736 Seoul, Korea
[email protected]Search for more papers by this authorJong Sook Yi
University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 388-1 Poongnap-2dong, Songpa-gu, 138-736 Seoul, Korea
Search for more papers by this authorYoung Ki Shong
Department of Endocrinology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 388-1 Poongnap-2dong, Songpa-gu, 138-736 Seoul, Korea
Search for more papers by this authorSeok Joon Hong
Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 388-1 Poongnap-2dong, Songpa-gu, 138-736 Seoul, Korea
Search for more papers by this authorDeok Hee Lee
Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 388-1 Poongnap-2dong, Songpa-gu, 138-736 Seoul, Korea
Search for more papers by this authorChoong Gon Choi
Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 388-1 Poongnap-2dong, Songpa-gu, 138-736 Seoul, Korea
Search for more papers by this authorSang Joon Kim
Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 388-1 Poongnap-2dong, Songpa-gu, 138-736 Seoul, Korea
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Background
The present study was designed to investigate the diagnostic ability of computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (USG) in the preoperative evaluation of the cervical nodal status of patients with thyroid cancer.
Methods
The study population consisted of 37 consecutive patients (female:male = 30:7, age range: 20–68 years) who subsequently underwent total thyroidectomy and neck dissection for thyroid cancer. The results of the review of the preoperative CT and those of the original USG reports were compared with the histopathologic results. The accuracy was evaluated by “per level” and “per patient” analyses of whether the CT or USG results had or had not altered the choice of surgical method.
Results
By “per level” analysis, the sensitivities, specificities, and diagnostic accuracies were 77%, 70%, 74% for CT and 62%, 79%, 68% for USG, respectively, with a significant difference in the sensitivities (p = 0.002). When the lymph node levels were grouped into central and lateral compartments, all of the values for the lateral compartment tended to be higher than those for the central compartment for both CT (78%, 78%, 78% versus 74%, 44%, 64%) and USG (65%, 82%, 71 versus 55%, 69%, 60%). By per patient analysis, the sensitivities, specificities, and diagnostic accuracies of CT and USG were 100%, 90%, 97% and 100%, 80%, 95%, respectively.
Conclusion
Despite of very high accuracy of USG by per patient analysis, the superior sensitivity of CT on the per level analysis may enable CT to play a complementary role for determining the surgical extent in selected patients with thyroid cancer.
References
- 1GrebeSK, HayID Thyroid cancer nodal metastases: biologic significance and therapeutic considerations. Surg Oncol Clin North Am (1996) 5: 43–63
- 2MazzaferriEL, KloosRT Clinical review 128: current approaches to primary therapy for papillary and follicular thyroid cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2001) 86: 1447–14631129756710.1210/jc.86.4.1447
- 3MazzaferriEL, JhiangSM Long-term impact of initial surgical and medical therapy on papillary and follicular thyroid cancer. Am J Med (1994) 97: 418–428797743010.1016/0002-9343(94)90321-2
- 4McHenryCR, RosenIB, WalfishPG Prospective management of nodal metastases in differentiated thyroid cancer. Am J Surg (1991) 162: 353–356195188810.1016/0002-9610(91)90147-6
- 5NoguchiS, MurakamiN, YamashitaH et al. Papillary thyroid carcinoma: modified radical neck dissection improves prognosis. Arch Surg (1998) 133: 276–280951774010.1001/archsurg.133.3.276
- 6ShahJP, LoreeTR, DharkerD et al. Prognostic factors in differentiated carcinoma of the thyroid gland. Am J Surg (1992) 164: 658–661146311910.1016/S0002-9610(05)80729-9
- 7CaronNR, TanYY, OgilvieJB et al. Selective modified radical neck dissection for papillary thyroid cancer-is level I, II and V dissection always necessary?. World J Surg (2006) 30: 833–8401655502410.1007/s00268-005-0358-5
- 8CheahWK, AriciC, ItuartePH et al. Complications of neck dissection for thyroid cancer. World J Surg (2002) 26: 1013–10161204586110.1007/s00268-002-6670-4
- 9de Baatenburg JongRJ, RongenRJ, LamerisJS et al. Metastatic neck disease. Palpation vs ultrasound examination. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (1989) 115: 689–690
- 10HaberalI, CelikH, GocmenH et al. Which is important in the evaluation of metastatic lymph nodes in head and neck cancer: palpation, ultrasonography, or computed tomography?. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (2004) 130: 197–2011499091610.1016/j.otohns.2003.08.025
- 11WatkinsonJC, FranklynJA, OlliffJF Detection and surgical treatment of cervical lymph nodes in differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid (2006) 16: 187–1941667640910.1089/thy.2006.16.187
- 12KouvarakiMA, ShapiroSE, FornageBD et al. Role of preoperative ultrasonography in the surgical management of patients with thyroid cancer. Surgery (2003) 134: 946–9541466872710.1016/S0039-6060(03)00424-0discussion 954–945
- 13StulakJM, GrantCS, FarleyDR et al. Value of preoperative ultrasonography in the surgical management of initial and reoperative papillary thyroid cancer. Arch Surg (2006) 141: 489–4961670252110.1001/archsurg.141.5.489
- 14KingAD, TseGMK, AhujaAT et al. Necrosis in metastatic neck nodes: diagnostic accuracy of CT, MR imaging, and US radiology. Radiology (2004) 230: 720–7261499083810.1148/radiol.2303030157
- 15SarvananK, BapurajJR, SharmaSC et al. Computed tomography and ultrasonographic evaluation of metastatic cervical lymph nodes with surgicoclinicopathologic correlation. J Laryngol Otol (2002) 116: 194–1991189326110.1258/0022215021910519
- 16JeongH-S, BaekC-H, SonY-I et al. Integrated 18F-FDG PET/CT for the initial evaluation of cervical node level of patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma: comparison with ultrasound and contrast-enhanced CT. Clin Endocrinol (2006) 65: 402–40710.1111/j.1365-2265.2006.02612.x
- 17SenchenkovA, StarenED Ultrasound in head and neck surgery: thyroid, parathyroid, and cervical lymph nodes. Surg Clin North Am (2004) 84: 973–10001526175010.1016/j.suc.2004.04.007
- 18SomPM, CurtinHD, MancusoAA Imaging-based nodal classification for evaluation of neck metastatic adenopathy. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2000) 174: 837–84410701636
- 19SomPM, BrandweinM, LidovM et al. The varied presentations of papillary thyroid carcinoma cervical nodal disease: CT and MR findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol (1994) 15: 1123–11288073982
- 20ItoY, TomodaC, UrunoT et al. Clinical significance of metastasis to the central compartment from papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid. World J Surg (2006) 30: 91–991636972110.1007/s00268-005-0113-y
- 21RosarioPWS, de FariaS, BicalhoL et al. Ultrasonographic differentiation between metastatic and benign lymph nodes in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma. J Ultrasound Med (2005) 24: 1385–138916179622
- 22ScheumannGF, GimmO, WegenerG et al. Prognostic significance and surgical management of locoregional lymph node metastases in papillary thyroid cancer. World J Surg (1994) 18: 559–567772574510.1007/BF00353765discussion 567–558
- 23SimonD, GoretzkiPE, WitteJ et al. Incidence of regional recurrence guiding radicality in differentiated thyroid carcinoma. World J Surg (1996) 20: 860–866867896310.1007/s002689900131discussion 866
- 24NoguchiS, MurakamiN The value of lymph-node dissection in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer. Surg Clin North Am (1987) 67: 251–2613551147
- 25LeeB-J, WangS-G, LeeJ-C et al. Level IIb lymph node metastasis in neck dissection for papillary thyroid carcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (2007) 133: 1028–10301793832710.1001/archotol.133.10.1028
- 26MachensA, HolzhausenH-J, DralleH Skip metastases in thyroid cancer leaping the central lymph node compartment. Arch Surg (2004) 139: 43–451471827410.1001/archsurg.139.1.43
- 27DijkstraPU, van WilgenPC, BuijsRP et al. Incidence of shoulder pain after neck dissection: a clinical explorative study for risk factors. Head Neck (2001) 23: 947–9531175449810.1002/hed.1137
- 28ShortSO, KaplanJN, LaramoreGE et al. Shoulder pain and function after neck dissection with or without preservation of the spinal accessory nerve. Am J Surg (1984) 148: 478–482648631610.1016/0002-9610(84)90373-8
- 29AhujaAT, YingM Sonographic evaluation of cervical lymph nodes. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2005) 184: 1691–169915855141
- 30AhujaAT, YingM, HoSS et al. Distribution of intranodal vessels in differentiating benign from metastatic neck nodes. Clin Radiol (2001) 56: 197–2011124769610.1053/crad.2000.0574
- 31ArijiY, KimuraY, HayashiN et al. Power Doppler sonography of cervical lymph nodes in patients with head and neck cancer. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol (1998) 19: 303–3079504483
- 32AtulaTS, VarpulaMJ, KurkiTJ et al. Assessment of cervical lymph node status in head and neck cancer patients: palpation, computed tomography and low field magnetic resonance imaging compared with ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology. Eur J Radiol (1997) 25: 152–161928384410.1016/S0720-048X(96)01071-6
- 33ChongVF, FanYF, KhooJB MRI features of cervical nodal necrosis in metastatic disease. Clin Radiol (1996) 51: 103–109863116110.1016/S0009-9260(96)80265-0
- 34CurtinHD, IshwaranH, MancusoAA et al. Comparison of CT and MR imaging in staging of neck metastases. Radiology (1998) 207: 123–1309530307
- 35DonDM, AnzaiY, LufkinRB et al. Evaluation of cervical lymph node metastases in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Laryngoscope (1995) 105: 669–674760326810.1288/00005537-199507000-00001
- 36SomPM Detection of metastasis in cervical lymph nodes: CT and MR criteria and differential diagnosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol (1992) 158: 961–9691566697
- 37van den BrekelMW, CastelijnsJA, StelHV et al. Modern imaging techniques and ultrasound-guided aspiration cytology for the assessment of neck node metastases: a prospective comparative study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol (1993) 250: 11–17846674410.1007/BF00176941
- 38YousemDM, SomPM, HackneyDB et al. Central nodal necrosis and extracapsular neoplastic spread in cervical lymph nodes: MR imaging versus CT. Radiology (1992) 182: 753–7591535890
