Reasons for being physically active in middle age and longitudinal associations between physical activity and physical capacity
Sara Lundell
Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorLouise Mian
Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorUlrika Aasa
Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Maria Westerståhl
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
Department of Clinical Physiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
Correspondence
Maria Westerståhl, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorSara Lundell
Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorLouise Mian
Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorUlrika Aasa
Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Maria Westerståhl
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
Department of Clinical Physiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
Correspondence
Maria Westerståhl, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
The aim was to investigate self-reported reasons for being leisure-time physically active (LTPA) at ages 34 and 52 and explore associations between LTPA at age 52 and physical activity, physical capacity, and health earlier in life. Cohort participants answered questions about physical activity and health and performed tests of physical capacity at ages 16, 34, and 52. The most frequently reported reasons for being LTPA or not at ages 34 and 52 were similar. Participants enjoyed being active and health benefits related to physical activity was important. Common barriers were other priorities, disability, and feeling too tired. A significantly higher percentage of those who were LTPA at the ages of 34 and 52 rated their general health to be good when compared to those who were not physically active. Analyses showed that higher muscle strength and endurance at the age of 34 could positively predict LTPA at 52. At ages 34 and 52, the cohort members presented with similar reasons for, and similar barriers to physical activity. Those who were LTPA rated their health better, and there was a significant association between physical capacity at the age of 34 and future physical activity.
CONFLICT OF INTERESTS
The authors have no competing interests or competing funding. The work was funded by Centrum för idrottsforskning and Forskningsrådet för arbetsliv och socialvetenskap. All authors have contributed to the article and agreed to the order of their names. All authors had full access to the data set relevant to the article.
Supporting Information
Filename | Description |
---|---|
tsm2116-sup-0001-AppendixS1.docxWord document, 14.4 KB |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
REFERENCES
- 1Rhodes RE, Janssen I, Bredin S, Warburton D, Bauman A. Physical activity: Health impact, prevalence, correlates and interventions. Psychol Health. 2017; 32(8): 942-975.
- 2Ruiz JR, Castro-Pinero J, Artero EG, et al. Predictive validity of health-related fitness in youth: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2009; 43(12): 909-923.
- 3Smith JJ, Eather N, Morgan PJ, Plotnikoff RC, Faigenbaum AD, Lubans DR. The health benefits of muscular fitness for children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2014; 44(9): 1209-1223.
- 4 WH Organization. Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines Review Committee; 2010.
- 5Twisk JW, Kemper HC, van Mechelen W. Tracking of activity and fitness and the relationship with cardiovascular disease risk factors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000; 32(8): 1455-1461.
- 6Foulkes M, Davis C. An index of tracking for longitudinal data. Biometrics. 1981; 37: 439-446.
- 7Engstrom LM. Barnidrott och vuxenmotion som kulturella uttryck. IdrottsforumOrg/artiklar [Internet].2005;31:augusti.
- 8Engström L. Smak för Motion : Fysisk Aktivitet Som Livsstil Och Social Markör. Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholms Universitetsförlag. 2010.
- 9Bauman AE, Reis RS, Sallis JF, et al. Correlates of physical activity: why are some people physically active and others not? Lancet. 2012; 380(9838): 258-271.
- 10Aasa U, Lundell S, Barnekow-Bergkvist M, Jansson E, Westerstahl M. The Swedish physical activity and fitness cohort born in 1958 - dropout analysis and overview at 36-year follow-up. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017; 27(4): 418-429.
- 11Boreham C, Twisk J, Neville C, Savage M, Murray L, Gallagher A. Associations between physical fitness and activity patterns during adolescence and cardiovascular risk factors in young adulthood: the Northern Ireland Young Hearts Project. Int J Sports Med. 2002; 23(Suppl 1): S22-S26.
- 12Hall C, Kemper G. Amsterdam Growth and Health Longitudinal Study (AGAHLS). Basel, Germany: S Karger AG; 2004.
- 13Matton L, Thomis M, Wijndaele K, et al. Tracking of physical fitness and physical activity from youth to adulthood in females. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006; 38(6): 1114-1120.
- 14Wijnstok NJ, Hoekstra T, van Mechelen W, Kemper HC, Twisk JW. Cohort profile: the Amsterdam growth and health longitudinal study. Int J Epidemiol. 2013; 42(2): 422-429.
- 15Aasa U, Lundell S, Aasa B, Westerstahl M. Physical activity might be of greater importance for good spinal control than if you have had pain or not: a longitudinal study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015; 40(24): 1926-1933.
- 16Hesselman Borg J, Westerstahl M, Lundell S, Madison G, Aasa U. Longitudinal study exploring factors associated with neck/shoulder pain at 52 years of age. J Pain Res. 2016; 9: 303-310.
- 17Westerstahl M, Jansson E, Barnekow-Bergkvist M, Aasa U. Longitudinal changes in physical capacity from adolescence to middle age in men and women. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1): 14767.
- 18Barnekow-Bergkvist M, Hedberg G, Janlert U, Jansson E. Development of muscular endurance and strength from adolescence to adulthood and level of physical capacity in men and women at the age of 34 years. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 1996; 6(3): 145-155.
- 19Barnekow-Bergkvist M, Hedberg G, Janlert U, Jansson E. Physical activity pattern in men and women at the ages of 16 and 34 and development of physical activity from adolescence to adulthood. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 1996; 6(6): 359-370.
- 20Barnekow-Bergkvist M, Hedberg G, Janlert U, Jansson E. Prediction of physical fitness and physical activity level in adulthood by physical performance and physical activity in adolescence–an 18-year follow-up study. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 1998; 8(5 Pt 1): 299-308.
- 21Barnekow-Bergkvist M, Hedberg G, Janlert U, Jansson E. Adolescent determinants of cardiovascular risk factors in adult men and women. Scand J Public Health. 2001; 29(3): 208-217.
- 22Barnekow-Bergkvist M, Hedberg G, Pettersson U, Lorentzon R. Relationships between physical activity and physical capacity in adolescent females and bone mass in adulthood. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2006; 16(6): 447-455.
- 23Glenmark B, Hedberg G, Jansson E. Running capacity from adolescence to adulthood. Relationship to physical characteristics. Int J Sports Med. 1993; 14(3): 118-123.
- 24Glenmark B, Hedberg G, Jansson E. Prediction of physical activity level in adulthood by physical characteristics, physical performance and physical activity in adolescence: an 11-year follow-up study. Eur J Appl Physiol. 1994; 69(6): 530-538.
- 25Jansson E, Hedberg G. Skeletal muscle fibres in teenagers: relationship to physical performance and physical activity. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 1991; 1: 31-44.
10.1111/j.1600-0838.1991.tb00268.x Google Scholar
- 26Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, et al. Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000; 32(9 Suppl): S498-504.
- 27Sullivan M, Karlsson J, Ware JE Jr. The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey–I. Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and construct validity across general populations in Sweden. Soc Sci Med. 1995; 41(10): 1349-1358.
- 28Huotari P, Nupponen H, Mikkelsson L, Laakso L, Kujala U. Adolescent physical fitness and activity as predictors of adulthood activity. J Sports Sci. 2011; 29(11): 1135-1141.
- 29Tammelin T. A review of longitudinal studies on youth predictors of adulthood physical activity. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2005; 17(1): 3-12.
- 30Roberts GC, Treasure DC, Balague G. Achievement goals in sport: the development and validation of the Perception of Success Questionnaire. J Sports Sci. 1998; 16(4): 337-347.
- 31Deci E, Ryan R. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York, NY: Plenum Press; 1985.
10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7 Google Scholar
- 32Warburton DE, Nicol CW, Bredin SS. Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. CMAJ. 2006; 174(6): 801-809.
- 33Joki A, Makela J, Fogelholm M. Permissive flexibility in successful lifelong weight management: A qualitative study among Finnish men and women. Appetite. 2017; 116: 157-163.
- 34Carlucci C, Kardachi J, Bradley SM, Prager J, Wyka K, Jayasinghe N. Evaluation of a community-based program that integrates joyful movement into fall prevention for older adults. Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2018; 4: 2333721418776789.
- 35Brunet J, Sabiston CM. Exploring motivation for physical activity across the adult lifespan. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2011; 12(2): 99-105.
- 36Justine M, Azizan A, Hassan V, Salleh Z, Manaf H. Barriers to participation in physical activity and exercise among middle-aged and elderly individuals. Singapore Med J. 2013; 54(10): 581-586.
- 37Schutzer KA, Graves BS. Barriers and motivations to exercise in older adults. Prev Med. 2004; 39(5): 1056-1061.
- 38Piercy KL, Troiano RP. Physical activity guidelines for Americans from the US Department of Health and Human Services. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018; 11(11):e005263.
- 39Sullivan AN, Lachman ME. Behavior change with fitness technology in sedentary adults: a review of the evidence for increasing physical activity. Front Public Health. 2016; 4: 289.
- 40Robinson SA, Lachman M. Perceived control and behavior change: A personalized approach. In: F Infurna, J Reich, eds. Perceived Control: Theory, Research, and Practice in the First 50 Years. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2016: 201-227.
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190257040.003.0009 Google Scholar
- 41Reichert FF, Barros AJ, Domingues MR, Hallal PC. The role of perceived personal barriers to engagement in leisure-time physical activity. Am J Public Health. 2007; 97(3): 515-519.
- 42O'Donovan G, Blazevich AJ, Boreham C, et al. The ABC of physical activity for health: a consensus statement from the British Association of Sport and Exercise Sciences. J Sports Sci. 2010; 28(6): 573-591.
- 43Allender S, Hutchinson L, Foster C. Life-change events and participation in physical activity: a systematic review. Health Promot Int. 2008; 23(2): 160-172.