Volume 68, Issue 4 pp. 624-627
POINT OF VIEW

Response to “The case for the continued use of the genus name Mimulus for all monkeyflowers”

Guy L. Nesom

Corresponding Author

Guy L. Nesom

Research Associate, Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103 U.S.A.

Address for correspondence: Guy L. Nesom, [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Naomi S. Fraga

Naomi S. Fraga

Rancho Santa Ana Botanical Garden, Claremont, California, 91711 U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
William R. Barker

William R. Barker

State Herbarium of South Australia, GPO Box 1047, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia; and Australian Centre for Evolutionary Biology and Biodiversity, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5000 Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Paul M. Beardsley

Paul M. Beardsley

Department of Biological Sciences, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, California, 91768 U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
David C. Tank

David C. Tank

Department of Biological Sciences and Stillinger Herbarium, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho, 83844 U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Bruce G. Baldwin

Bruce G. Baldwin

Jepson Herbarium and Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California, 94720 U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Richard G. Olmstead

Richard G. Olmstead

Department of Biology and Burke Museum, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, 98195 U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 15 November 2019
Citations: 9
Associate Editor: Dirk C. Albach
First page image

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.