Computer vision-based real-time cable tension estimation algorithm using complexity pursuit from video and its application in Fred-Hartman cable-stayed bridge
Debasish Jana
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Satish Nagarajaiah
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA
Correspondence
Satish Nagarajaiah, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorYongchao Yang
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA
Department of Mechanical Engineering-Engineering Mechanics, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, Michigan, USA
Search for more papers by this authorDebasish Jana
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Satish Nagarajaiah
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA
Correspondence
Satish Nagarajaiah, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorYongchao Yang
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA
Department of Mechanical Engineering-Engineering Mechanics, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, Michigan, USA
Search for more papers by this authorFunding information: Science and Engineering Research Board, India; Rice University
Summary
Real-time health monitoring of stay cables in cable-stayed bridges is necessary for timely maintenance and to avoid unforeseen fatigue damage due to vortex-induced vibration—mainly due to combination rain and wind-related dynamic loads. Conventional contact-based sensors may often malfunction in harsh weather conditions and are expensive to install and maintain. Therefore, recently, the usage of non-contact camera-based measurement is burgeoning in the domain of structural sensing. Non-contact video-based sensing provides a higher spatial resolution compared to conventional sensors along with a lower cost. Therefore, in this paper, we present a framework that uses video-based measurement as multiple sensors to reduce the estimation error in determining the real-time cable tension. First, we calculate the vibration response using the phase-based motion estimation algorithm for various locations of interest. We then intuitively fuse the data from all the locations to estimate the real-time frequency variation using a blind source separation (BSS) technique named complexity pursuit (CP). Finally, the real-time stay-cable tension is calculated from the real-time frequency history using the taut-string theory. The proposed algorithm is applied to Fred-Hartman cable-stayed bridge in Houston, Texas. The algorithm is validated using actual tension in the cable. We also show that the estimation error in the proposed sliding window-based CP framework is considerably lesser than the conventional real-time tension estimation technique using Short-time Fourier Transform (STFT). The accurate estimation of stay-cable tension from the video-based measurement shows the significant potential of the proposed framework in the domain of structural health monitoring.
Open Research
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.
REFERENCES
- 1Nagarajaiah S, Erazo K. Structural monitoring and identification of civil infrastructure in the United States. Struct Monit Maint. 2016; 3(1): 51-69.
- 2Chen L, Sun L, Nagarajaiah S. Cable with discrete negative stiffness device and viscous damper: passive realization and general characteristics. Smart Struct Syst. 2015; 15(3): 627-643.
- 3Tabatabai H. Inspection and Maintenance of Bridge Stay Cable Systems: A Synthesis of Highway Practice, Vol. 353. Transportation Research Board; 2005.
- 4Mehrabi AB. In-service evaluation of cable-stayed bridges, overview of available methods and findings. J Bridge Eng. 2006; 11(6): 716-724.
- 5Wang D, Liu J, Zhou D, Huang S. Using PVDF piezoelectric film sensors for in situ measurement of stayed-cable tension of cable-stayed bridges. Smart Mater Struct. 1999; 8(5): 554.
- 6Wang ML, Wang G, Zhao Y. Application of em stress sensors in large steel cables. Sensing Issues in Civil Structural Health Monitoring. Springer; 2005: 145-154.
10.1007/1-4020-3661-2_15 Google Scholar
- 7Li H, Ou J, Zhou Z. Applications of optical fibre Bragg gratings sensing technology-based smart stay cables. Opt Lasers Eng. 2009; 47(10): 1077-1084.
- 8Russell JC, Lardner TJ. Experimental determination of frequencies and tension for elastic cables. J Eng Mech. 1998; 124(10): 1067-1072.
- 9Kim BH, Park T. Estimation of cable tension force using the frequency-based system identification method. J Sound Vib. 2007; 304(3-5): 660-676.
- 10Ren W-X, Chen G, Hu W-H, et al. Empirical formulas to estimate cable tension by cable fundamental frequency. Struct Eng Mech. 2005; 20(3): 363-380.
- 11Zui H, Shinke T, Namita Y. Practical formulas for estimation of cable tension by vibration method. J Struct Eng. 1996; 122(6): 651-656.
- 12Casciati F, Casciati S, Elia L, Faravelli L. Tension estimates in cable stayed bridges. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Performance-based and Life-cycle Structural Engineering, Australia; 2015.
- 13Casciati S. Human induced vibration vs. cable-stay footbridge deterioration. Smart Struct Syst. 2016; 18(1): 17-29. https://doi.org/10.12989/SSS.2016.18.1.017
- 14Casciati F, Casciati S, Elia L, Faravelli L. Optimal reduction from an initial sensor deployment along the deck of a cable-stayed bridge. Smart Struct Syst. 2016; 17(3): 523-539.
- 15Li H, Zhang F, Jin Y. Real-time identification of time-varying tension in stay cables by monitoring cable transversal acceleration. Struct Control Health Monit. 2014; 21(7): 1100-1117.
- 16Yang Y, Li S, Nagarajaiah S, Li H, Zhou P. Real-time output-only identification of time-varying cable tension from accelerations via complexity pursuit. J Struct Eng. 2015; 142(1):04015083.
- 17Jana D, Nagarajaiah S, Yang Y, Li S. Real-time cable tension estimation from acceleration measurements using wireless sensors with packet data losses: analytics with compressive sensing and sparse component analysis. J Civil Struct Health Monit. 2021: 1-19.
- 18Bao Y, Shi Z, Beck JL, Li H, Hou TY. Identification of time-varying cable tension forces based on adaptive sparse time-frequency analysis of cable vibrations. Struct Control Health Monit. 2017; 24(3):e1889.
- 19Wang C, Ren W-X, Wang Z-C, Zhu H-P. Instantaneous frequency identification of time-varying structures by continuous wavelet transform. Eng Struct. 2013; 52: 17-25.
- 20Jeong S, Kim H, Lee J, Sim S-H. Automated wireless monitoring system for cable tension forces using deep learning. Struct Health Monit. 2020; 20(4):1475921720935837.
- 21Straser EG, Kiremidjian AS, Meng TH. Modular, Wireless Damage Monitoring System for Structures: Google Patents. US Patent 6,292,108; 2001.
- 22Cho S, Lynch JP, Lee J-J, Yun C-B. Development of an automated wireless tension force estimation system for cable-stayed bridges. J Intell Mater Syst Struct. 2010; 21(3): 361-376.
- 23Jana D, Patil J, Herkal S, Nagarajaiah S, Duenas-Osorio L. CNN and convolutional autoencoder (CAE) based real-time sensor fault detection, localization, and correction. Mech Syst Sig Process. 2022; 169: 108723.
- 24Feng D, Feng MQ, Ozer E, Fukuda Y. A vision-based sensor for noncontact structural displacement measurement. Sensors. 2015; 15(7): 16557-16575.
- 25Dong C-Z, Catbas FN. A review of computer vision-based structural health monitoring at local and global levels. Struct Health Monit. 2020; 20(2): 692-743. 1475921720935585.
- 26Xu Y, Brownjohn JMW. Review of machine-vision based methodologies for displacement measurement in civil structures. J Civil Struct Health Monit. 2018; 8(1): 91-110.
- 27Brunton SL, Proctor JL, Kutz JN. Discovering governing equations from data by sparse identification of nonlinear dynamical systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2016; 113(15): 3932-3937.
- 28Lai Z, Nagarajaiah S. Sparse structural system identification method for nonlinear dynamic systems with hysteresis/inelastic behavior. Mech Syst Sig Process. 2019; 117: 813-842.
- 29Kim S-W, Jeon B-G, Kim N-S, Park J-C. Vision-based monitoring system for evaluating cable tensile forces on a cable-stayed bridge. Struct Health Monit. 2013; 12(5-6): 440-456.
- 30Zhou X, Xia Y, Wei Z, Wu Q. A videogrammetric technique for measuring the vibration displacement of stay cables. Geo-spatial Inf Sci. 2012; 15(2): 135-141.
10.1080/10095020.2012.714105 Google Scholar
- 31Kim S-W, Kim N-S. Dynamic characteristics of suspension bridge hanger cables using digital image processing. NDT & E Int. 2013; 59: 25-33.
- 32Chen W, Jana D, Singh A, et al. Measurement and identification of the nonlinear dynamics of a jointed structure using full-field data, Part I: measurement of nonlinear dynamics. Mech Syst Sig Process. 2022; 166: 108401.
- 33Jin M, Kosova G, Cenedese M, et al. Measurement and identification of the nonlinear dynamics of a jointed structure using full-field data; Part II—nonlinear system identification. Mech Syst Sig Process. 2022; 166: 108402.
- 34Caetano E, Silva S, Bateira J. Application of a vision system to the monitoring of cable structures. In: Seventh International Symposium on Cable Dynamics Citeseer; 2007: 225-236.
- 35Feng D, Scarangello T, Feng MQ, Ye Q. Cable tension force estimate using novel noncontact vision-based sensor. Measurement. 2017; 99: 44-52.
- 36Yang Y, Sanchez L, Zhang H, et al. Estimation of full-field, full-order experimental modal model of cable vibration from digital video measurements with physics-guided unsupervised machine learning and computer vision. Struct Control Health Monit. 2019; 26:e2358.
- 37Jana D, Nagarajaiah S. Computer vision based real time cable tension estimation in Dubrovnik cable stayed bridge using moving handheld video camera. Structural Control and Health Monitoring; 2021.
- 38Li S, Wei S, Bao Y, Li H. Condition assessment of cables by pattern recognition of vehicle-induced cable tension ratio. Eng Struct. 2018; 155: 1-15.
- 39Bhowmick S, Nagarajaiah S. Identification of full-field dynamic modes using continuous displacement response estimated from vibrating edge video. J Sound Vib. 2020; 489: 115657.
- 40Bhowmick S, Nagarajaiah S, Lai Z. Measurement of full-field displacement time history of a vibrating continuous edge from video. Mech Syst Sig Process. 2020; 144: 106847.
- 41Zuo D, Jones NP. Stay-cable vibration monitoring of the Fred Hartman Bridge (Houston, Texas) and the Veterans Memorial Bridge (Port Arthur, Texas). Texas. Dept. of Transportation. Research and Technology Implementation Office; 2005.
- 42 BeeCreekPhotography. Fred Hartman Bridge Night. [Online; accessed 15-Aug-2018].
- 43Liu M-Y, Zuo D, Jones NP. Analytical and numerical study of deck-stay interaction in a cable-stayed bridge in the context of field observations. J Eng Mechs. 2013; 139(11): 1636-1652.
- 44Zuo D, Jones NP. Stay-cable vibration monitoring of the Fred Hartman Bridge (Houston, Texas) and the Veterans Memorial Bridge (Port Arthur, Texas). Technical Report; 2005. Texas. Dept. of Transportation. Research and Technology Implementation Office.
- 45Phelan RS, Mehta KC, Sarkar PP, Chen L. Investigation of wind–rain induced cable-stay vibrations on cable-stayed bridges. Final Rep; 2002.
- 46Davenport AG. The spectrum of horizontal gustiness near the ground in high winds. Quart J R Meteorol Soc. 1961; 87(372): 194-211.
- 47Sutton MA, Orteu JJ, Schreier H. Image Correlation for Shape, Motion and Deformation Measurements: Basic Concepts, Theory and Applications: Springer Science & Business Media; 2009.
- 48Horn BK, Schunck BG. Determining optical flow. Artif Intell. 1981; 17(1-3): 185-203.
- 49Wadhwa N, Rubinstein M, Durand F, Freeman WT. Phase-based video motion processing. ACM Trans Graphics (TOG). 2013; 32(4): 80.
- 50Chen JG, Wadhwa N, Cha Y-J, Durand F, Freeman WT, Buyukozturk O. Modal identification of simple structures with high-speed video using motion magnification. J Sound Vib. 2015; 345: 58-71.
- 51Fleet DJ, Jepson AD. Computation of component image velocity from local phase information. Int J Comput Vision. 1990; 5(1): 77-104.
- 52Simoncelli EP, Freeman WT. The steerable pyramid: a flexible architecture for multi-scale derivative computation. In: Image Processing, 1995. Proceedings., International Conference on, Vol. 3. IEEE; 1995: 444-447.
- 53Portilla J, Simoncelli EP. A parametric texture model based on joint statistics of complex wavelet coefficients. Int J Comput Vision. 2000; 40(1): 49-70.
- 54Yang Y, Dorn C, Mancini T, et al. Blind identification of full-field vibration modes from video measurements with phase-based video motion magnification. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2017; 85: 567-590.
- 55Davis A, Rubinstein M, Wadhwa N, Mysore GJ, Durand F, Freeman WT. The visual microphone: passive recovery of sound from video; 2014.
- 56Simoncelli EP, Adelson EH. Subband transforms. In: JW Woods, ed. Subband Image Coding. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1990: 143-192.
- 57Heeger DJ. Notes on Steerable Filters. Citeseer; 1998.
- 58Fujino Y, Warnitchai P, Pacheco BM. An experimental and analytical study of autoparametric resonance in a 3DOF model of cable-stayed-beam. Nonlinear Dyn. 1993; 4(2): 111-138.
10.1007/BF00045250 Google Scholar
- 59Allen J. Short term spectral analysis, synthesis, and modification by discrete fourier transform. IEEE Trans Acoust, Speech, Sig Process. 1977; 25(3): 235-238.
- 60Van Overschee P, De Moor B. Subspace algorithms for the stochastic identification problem. In: Decision and Control, 1991. Proceedings of the 30th IEEE Conference on IEEE; 1991: 1321-1326.
- 61Magalhaes F, Cunha A, Caetano E. Online automatic identification of the modal parameters of a long span arch bridge. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2009; 23(2): 316-329.
- 62Brincker R, Zhang L, Andersen P. Modal identification of output-only systems using frequency domain decomposition. Smart Mater Struct. 2001; 10(3): 441.
- 63Rainieri C, Fabbrocino G. Automated output-only dynamic identification of civil engineering structures. Mech Syst Sig Process. 2010; 24(3): 678-695.
- 64Spiridonakos MD, Poulimenos AG, Fassois SD. Output-only identification and dynamic analysis of time-varying mechanical structures under random excitation: a comparative assessment of parametric methods. J Sound Vib. 2010; 329(7): 768-785.
- 65Nagarajaiah S, Chen B. Output only structural modal identification using matrix pencil method. Struct Monit Mainten. 2016; 3(4): 395-406.
10.12989/smm.2016.3.4.395 Google Scholar
- 66Nagarajaiah S, Yang Y. Modeling and harnessing sparse and low-rank data structure: a new paradigm for structural dynamics, identification, damage detection, and health monitoring. Struct Control Health Monit. 2017; 24(1):e1851.
- 67Sadhu A, Narasimhan S, Antoni J. A review of output-only structural mode identification literature employing blind source separation methods. Mech Syst Sig Process. 2017; 94: 415-431.
- 68Kerschen G, Poncelet F, Golinval J-C. Physical interpretation of independent component analysis in structural dynamics. Mech Syst Sig Process. 2007; 21(4): 1561-1575.
- 69Yang Y, Nagarajaiah S. Blind identification of damage in time-varying systems using independent component analysis with wavelet transform. Mech Syst Sig Process. 2014; 47(1-2): 3-20.
- 70Abazarsa F, Ghahari SF, Nateghi F, Taciroglu E. Response-only modal identification of structures using limited sensors. Struct Control Health Monit. 2013; 20(6): 987-1006.
- 71Hazra B, Roffel AJ, Narasimhan S, Pandey MD. Modified cross-correlation method for the blind identification of structures. J Eng Mech. 2009; 136(7): 889-897.
- 72Huang C, Nagarajaiah S. Experimental study on bridge structural health monitoring using blind source separation method: arch bridge. Struct Monit Mainten. 2014; 1(1): 69.
10.12989/smm.2014.1.1.069 Google Scholar
- 73Yang Y, Nagarajaiah S. Blind modal identification of output-only structures in time-domain based on complexity pursuit. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2013; 42(13): 1885-1905.
- 74Yang Y, Nagarajaiah S. Structural damage identification via a combination of blind feature extraction and sparse representation classification. Mech Syst Sig Process. 2014; 45(1): 1-23.
- 75Yang Y, Dorn C, Mancini T, et al. Blind identification of full-field vibration modes of output-only structures from uniformly-sampled, possibly temporally-aliased (sub-Nyquist), video measurements. J Sound Vib. 2017; 390: 232-256.
- 76Hyvärinen A, Oja E. Independent component analysis: algorithms and applications. Neural Netw. 2000; 13(4-5): 411-430.
- 77Abdi H, Williams LJ. Principal component analysis. Wiley Interdiscip Rev: Comput Stat. 2010; 2(4): 433-459.
10.1002/wics.101 Google Scholar
- 78Stone JV. Blind source separation using temporal predictability. Neural Comput. 2001; 13(7): 1559-1574.
- 79Belouchrani A, Abed-Meraim K, Cardoso J-F, Moulines E. A blind source separation technique using second-order statistics. IEEE Trans Sig Process. 1997; 45(2): 434-444.
- 80Hyvärinen A. Complexity pursuit: separating interesting components from time series. Neural Comput. 2001; 13(4): 883-898.
- 81Xie S, He Z, Fu Y. A note on Stone's conjecture of blind signal separation. Neural Comput. 2005; 17(2): 321-330.
- 82Stone JV. Learning perceptually salient visual parameters using spatiotemporal smoothness constraints. Neural Comput. 1996; 8(7): 1463-1492.