Volume 36, Issue 24 pp. 3844-3857
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Model averaging for robust assessment of QT prolongation by concentration-response analysis

A.G. Dosne

Corresponding Author

A.G. Dosne

Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

Correspondence

Anne-Gaëlle Dosne, Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Box 591, 751 24 Uppsala, Sweden.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
M. Bergstrand

M. Bergstrand

Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
M.O. Karlsson

M.O. Karlsson

Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
D. Renard

D. Renard

Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
G. Heimann

G. Heimann

Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 13 July 2017
Citations: 5

Abstract

Assessing the QT prolongation potential of a drug is typically done based on pivotal safety studies called thorough QT studies. Model-based estimation of the drug-induced QT prolongation at the estimated mean maximum drug concentration could increase efficiency over the currently used intersection-union test. However, robustness against model misspecification needs to be guaranteed in pivotal settings. The objective of this work was to develop an efficient, fully prespecified model-based inference method for thorough QT studies, which controls the type I error and provides satisfactory test power. This is achieved by model averaging: The proposed estimator of the concentration-response relationship is a weighted average of a parametric (linear) and a nonparametric (monotonic I-splines) estimator, with weights based on mean integrated square error. The desired properties of the method were confirmed in an extensive simulation study, which demonstrated that the proposed method controlled the type I error adequately, and that its power was higher than the power of the nonparametric method alone. The method can be extended from thorough QT studies to the analysis of QT data from pooled phase I studies.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.