Volume 46, Issue 6 pp. 559-565
Original Article

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation is no more effective than usual care for the treatment of primary dysphagia in children

Mary E. Christiaanse MD

Corresponding Author

Mary E. Christiaanse MD

Department of Pediatrics, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina

Associate Professor.

3325 Silas Creek Parkway, Winston-Salem, NC 27103.Search for more papers by this author
Betty Mabe MEd

Betty Mabe MEd

Department of Pediatrics, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina

Search for more papers by this author
Greg Russell MS

Greg Russell MS

Department of Biostatistical Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina

Search for more papers by this author
Tanya Long Simeone MA

Tanya Long Simeone MA

Hearing and Speech Department, North Carolina Baptist Hospital, Winston-Salem, North Carolina

Search for more papers by this author
John Fortunato MD

John Fortunato MD

Department of Pediatrics, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina

Assistant Professor.

Search for more papers by this author
Bruce Rubin MEngr, MD, MBA

Bruce Rubin MEngr, MD, MBA

Department of Pediatrics, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia

Professor and Chairman.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 30 December 2010
Citations: 52

Abstract

Objective

Dysphagia can lead to chronic aspiration and pulmonary disease. The objective of this study was to compare change in swallowing function in pediatric patients with dysphagia who received neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) to a control group who received usual oral motor training and dietary manipulations without NMES.

Study design

Retrospective analysis of change in Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) level derived from videofluoscopic swallowing studies performed before and after NMES (treatment group: N = 46) compared to control group (control group: N = 47). Children were classified into two groups based on the etiology of their dysphagia (primary vs. acquired). NMES took place in a tertiary medical center for an average of 22 treatment sessions over 10 weeks. An independent t-test was used to test for differences in the change in FOIS level between groups. An analysis of covariance was run within groups to assess the relationship between diagnosis and change in FOIS level.

Results

Both groups improved in their FOIS level (P < 0.01) but the amount of change was not different (P = 0.11). Only the treatment group who had acquired dysphagia improved more than the similar subgroup of control children (P = 0.007).

Conclusion

NMES treatment of anterior neck muscles in a heterogeneous group of pediatric patients with dysphagia did not improve the swallow function more than that seen in patients who did not receive NMES treatment. However, there may be subgroups of children that will improve with NMES treatment. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 2011; 46:559–565. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.