Volume 30, Issue 5 pp. 728-735
PAPER

Emotional approach coping among young adults with cancer: Relationships with psychological distress, posttraumatic growth, and resilience

Katie Darabos

Corresponding Author

Katie Darabos

Behavioral Oncology Research, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

Correspondence

Katie Darabos, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia 3615 Civic Center Blvd, ARC 1427.29 PA, PA 19104, USA.

Email: [email protected]/

Search for more papers by this author
Megan E. Renna

Megan E. Renna

Comprehensive Cancer Center and Institute for Behavioral Medicine Research, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Ashley W. Wang

Ashley W. Wang

Department of Psychology, Soochow University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC

Search for more papers by this author
Caroline F. Zimmermann

Caroline F. Zimmermann

Department of Psychology, Hunter College & The Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York, New York, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Michael A. Hoyt

Michael A. Hoyt

Population Health and Disease Prevention and the Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Irvine, California, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 26 December 2020
Citations: 20

Abstract

Objective

Cancer, particularly, during young adulthood, can evoke difficult emotions, interfere with normative developmental activities, and challenge coping responses. Emotion-regulating coping efforts aimed at active emotional processing (EP) and emotional expression (EE) can be beneficial to cancer adjustment and perceptions of positive growth. However, it may be that EP and EE work differently to influence well-being. This study examines relationships of EP and EE with psychological distress, posttraumatic growth (PTG), and resilience. We expect that EP will be positively associated with PTG and resilience, whereas EE will be negatively associated with psychological distress.

Methods

Young adults with cancer (M age = 34.68, N = 57) completed measures of emotional; approach coping (EP and EE), psychological distress (depressive symptoms, fear of cancer; recurrence [FCR]) and indicators of positive adjustment and growth (resilience and PTG).

Results

Greater use of EP was associated with higher resilience (β = 0.48, p = 0.003) and PTG (β = 0.27, p = 0.05), whereas greater use of EE was associated with lower resilience (β = −0.33, p = 0.04). The EE × EP interaction was significant for FCR (β = 0.29, p = 0.04) such that low EE was associated with lower FCR in those with high EP. Interaction effects were not significant for depressive symptoms, resilience, or PTG.

Conclusions

Findings highlight differing relationships between EP and EE among young adults with cancer. Interventions aimed at increasing emotion-regulating coping strategies may prove useful in facilitating positive adjustment and growth, strengthening young adults' ability to cope with the diverse effects of disease, treatment, and survivorship.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.