Volume 29, Issue 11 pp. 1927-1935
PAPER

Psychosocial distress among oncology patients in the safety net

Theora Cimino

Corresponding Author

Theora Cimino

University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA

Correspondence

Theora Cimino, University of California at San Francisco.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Kiana Said

Kiana Said

Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, San Francisco, CA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Leslie Safier

Leslie Safier

Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, San Francisco, CA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Heather Harris

Heather Harris

Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, San Francisco, CA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Anne Kinderman

Anne Kinderman

Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, San Francisco, CA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 18 August 2020
Citations: 19

Abstract

Objective

Psychosocial distress among cancer patients leads to poor health outcomes and lower satisfaction. However, little is known about psychosocial distress among disadvantaged populations. We examined the prevalence, predictors, and follow-up experience of psychosocial distress among cancer patients within a diverse, urban, and multi-lingual safety-net setting.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of cancer patients undergoing psychosocial distress screening at initial medical oncology visits from 2014-2016. The primary outcome was self-reported moderate to severe psychosocial distress, defined by the NCCN as a Distress Thermometer score ≥ 4. Predictors of distress were assessed using logistic regression. Patients reporting distress were contacted by telephone 1-12 months later to reassess distress and assess completion of supportive service referrals.

Results

Among 200 screened patients, 61% had moderate to severe psychosocial distress. African-American race, psychiatric illness, greater number of emotional problems, and reported problems with housing, money, worry, sleep, memory or homelessness were associated with psychosocial distress. Among 39 patients with moderate to severe psychosocial distress who completed follow-up (42% of eligible patients), mean distress scores decreased from 6.5 at screening to 4.5 at follow-up (P < .02). 56% of the supportive service referrals made at the initial visit were not completed.

Conclusions

Cancer patients in the safety-net experience more psychosocial distress than other populations, with persistently elevated distress levels and difficulty accessing supportive services. We identified subgroups that may be at higher risk for psychosocial distress. Closer follow-up and assistance for patients who report high distress levels may be needed.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.