The effect of physician–patient sex concordance in medicine has been reported in many studies. Whether physicians believe that the sex concordance between physician and athlete influences treatment has not been investigated.

Objective

To determine whether physicians believe that the sex concordance between physician and athlete influences treatment.

Design

Cross-sectional study.

Setting

Online survey.

Participants

One thousand one hundred ninety-three sports medicine physicians in 51 countries. Participants were sports medicine physicians trained in orthopedics (n = 443 [37.1%]) and nonorthopedics (n = 750 [62.9%]).

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Participants were asked to decide whether sex of the physician made them better suited to care for athletes of concordant or different sexes along with their personal background.

Results

Orthopedic sports medicine physicians agreed less than nonorthopedic sports medicine physicians regarding the statement “MALE sports medicine physicians are better suited than their female counterparts to care for MALE athletes” (odds ratio [OR] 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35–0.91, p = .02), and compared to sports medicine physicians based in Europe, those based in Asia agreed more to this statement (OR 7.91, 95% CI 4.60–13.60, p < .01). In addition, regarding the statement “FEMALE sports medicine physicians are better suited than their male counterparts to care for FEMALE athletes,” compared to sports medicine physicians based in Europe, those based in Asia (OR 9.12, 95% CI 5.63–14.79, p < .01) and North America (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.46–3.25, p < .01) agreed more and orthopedic sports medicine physicians agreed less than nonorthopedic sports medicine physicians (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39–0.93, p = .02) to this statement.

Conclusions

Sports medicine physicians trained in orthopedics felt sex concordance was less important than physicians trained in other specialties. Asian sports medicine physicians believed sex concordance was more important compared to physicians in other regions.

REFERENCES

1Bertakis KD, Azari R. Patient-centered care: the influence of patient and resident physician gender and gender concordance in primary care. J Womens Health. 2012; 21(3): 326-333.
10.1089/jwh.2011.2903
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
2Kelly JM. Sex preference in patient selection of a family physician. J Fam Pract. 1980; 11(3): 427-433.
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
3Lurie N, Slater J, McGovern P, Ekstrum J, Quam L, Margolis K. Preventive care for women – does the sex of the physician matter? N Engl J Med. 1993; 329(7): 478-482.
10.1056/NEJM199308123290707
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
4Heaton CJ, Marquez JT. Patient preferences for physician gender in the male genital/rectal exam. Fam Pract Res J. 1990; 10: 105-115.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
5Nolen HA, Moore JX, Rodgers JB, Wang HE, Walter LA. Patient preference for physician gender in the emergency department. Yale J Biol Med. 2016; 89(2): 131-142.
PubMed Google Scholar
6Aspalter M, Linni K, Metzger P, Hölzenbein T. Female choice for surgical specialties: development in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland over the past decade. Eur Surg. 2014; 46(6): 234-238.
10.1007/s10353-014-0284-6
Web of Science® Google Scholar
7Fayaz HC, Smith RM, Ebrahimzadeh MH, et al. Improvement of orthopedic residency programs and diversity: dilemmas and challenges, an international perspective. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2019; 7(4): 384-396.
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
8Schroeder JE, Zisk-Rony RY, Liebergall M, et al. Medical students' and interns' interest in orthopedic surgery: the gender factor. J Surg Educ. 2014; 71(2): 198-204.
10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.08.005
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
9 Japanese. Gender Equality Committee and System Reform Committee. 2022 http://joa-danjo.jp/about/about.html
Google Scholar
10Chambers CC, Ihnow SB, Monroe EJ, Suleiman LI. Women in orthopaedic surgery: population trends in trainees and practicing surgeons. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018; 100(17):e116.
10.2106/JBJS.17.01291
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
11Berger JT. The influence of physicians' demographic characteristics and their patients' demographic characteristics on physician practice: implications for education and research. Acad Med. 2008; 83(1): 100-105.
10.1097/ACM.0b013e31815c6713
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
12Tsukahara Y, Novak M, Takei S, et al. Gender bias in sports medicine: an international assessment of sports medicine physicians' perceptions of their interactions with athletes, coaches, athletic trainers and other physicians. Br J Sports Med. 2022; 56: 961-969.
10.1136/bjsports-2021-104695
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
13Tsukahara Y, Novak M, Takei S, et al. An international study on attitudes and opinions regarding female sports medicine physicians during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Phys Sportsmed. 2022; 1-7. doi:10.1080/00913847.2022.2154624
10.1080/00913847.2022.2154624
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
14 World Economic Forum. Global Gender Gap Report 2023. 2023 https://www.weforum.org/reports/global-gender-gap-report-2023/
Google Scholar
15McKinstry B. Are there too many female medical graduates? Yes. BMJ. 2008; 336(7647):748. doi:10.1136/bmj.39505.491065.94
10.1136/bmj.39505.491065.94
PubMed Google Scholar
16 MEN HWHO. Number of women entering medical school rises after decade of decline. BMJ. 2018; 167.
Google Scholar
17O'Reilly OC, Day MA, Cates WT, Baron JE, Glass NA, Westermann RW. Female team physician representation in professional and collegiate athletics. Am J Sports Med. 2020; 48(3): 739-743. doi:10.1177/0363546519897039
10.1177/0363546519897039
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
18Nishimura M, Ono M, Matsumura S. Do female patients prefer female physicians? Gender and sex specific medicine. Gend Sex Spe Med. 2005; 2(2): 239-244.
Google Scholar
19Bang E, Wong S, Jeffery TD. High school students' stereotypic images of scientists in South Korea. MIJE. 2014; 4(1): 96-112.
10.13054/mije.13.58.4.1
Google Scholar
20 WorldEducationNew+Reviews. Education in South Korea. Accessed February 3rd, 2022 https://wenr.wes.org/2018/10/education-in-south-korea
Google Scholar
21Fang MC, McCarthy EP, Singer DE. Are patients more likely to see physicians of the same sex? Recent national trends in primary care medicine. Am J Med. 2004; 117(8): 575-581.
10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.03.043
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
22Wesner ML, Vallance J. Athletes' preference for gender of team physician. Clin J Sport Med. 2007; 17(2): 143-144. doi:10.1097/JSM.0b013e31802b4fa6
10.1097/JSM.0b013e31802b4fa6
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
23Schmittdiel J, Grumbach K, Selby JV, Quesenberry CP. Effect of physician and patient gender concordance on patient satisfaction and preventive care practices. J Gen Intern Med. 2000; 15(11): 761-769.
10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.91156.x
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
24Greenwood BN, Carnahan S, Huang L. Patient-physician gender concordance and increased mortality among female heart attack patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018; 115(34): 8569-8574. doi:10.1073/pnas.1800097115
10.1073/pnas.1800097115
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
25De Souza MJ, Nattiv A, Joy E, et al. 2014 female athlete triad coalition consensus statement on treatment and return to play of the female athlete triad: 1st international conference held in San Francisco, California, may 2012 and 2nd international conference held in Indianapolis, Indiana, may 2013. Br J Sports Med. 2014; 48(4): 289. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2013-093218
10.1136/bjsports-2013-093218
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
26Statuta SM, Asif IM, Drezner JA. Relative energy deficiency in sport (RED-S). Br J Sports Med. 2017; 51(21): 1570-1571. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2017-097700
10.1136/bjsports-2017-097700
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
27Hall JA, Roter DL. Do patients talk differently to male and female physicians?: a meta-analytic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2002; 48(3): 217-224.
10.1016/S0738-3991(02)00174-X
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
28Errani C, Tsukamoto S, Kido A, et al. Women and men in orthopaedics. SICOT-J. 2021; 7: 20. doi:10.1051/sicotj/2021020
10.1051/sicotj/2021020
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar

Volume16, Issue4

Special Issue: Sports Medicine Focused Issue Developed in Partnership with AMSSM

April 2024

Pages 331-338

This article also appears in:

Sports Medicine

International study of physicians' opinion on physician–patient sex concordance when treating athletes

Abstract

Background

Objective

Design

Setting

Participants

Interventions

Main Outcome Measures

Results

Conclusions

REFERENCES

References

Information

About Wiley Online Library

Help & Support

Opportunities

Connect with Wiley

International study of physicians' opinion on physician–patient sex concordance when treating athletes

Abstract

Background

Objective

Design

Setting

Participants

Interventions

Main Outcome Measures

Results

Conclusions

REFERENCES

References

Related

Information