Temperament and Attentional Bias in Vocal Emotional Stroop Tasks
Corresponding Author
Marko Paelecke
Department of Psychology, Julius-Maximilians-Universität, Würzburg, Germany
Marko Paelecke, Department of Psychology I, Julius-Maximilians-Universität, D-97070 Würzburg, Germany.
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorYvonne Paelecke-Habermann
Department of Psychology, Julius-Maximilians-Universität, Würzburg, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorPeter Borkenau
Department of Psychology, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Marko Paelecke
Department of Psychology, Julius-Maximilians-Universität, Würzburg, Germany
Marko Paelecke, Department of Psychology I, Julius-Maximilians-Universität, D-97070 Würzburg, Germany.
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorYvonne Paelecke-Habermann
Department of Psychology, Julius-Maximilians-Universität, Würzburg, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorPeter Borkenau
Department of Psychology, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Human information processing is influenced by the affective quality of pleasant and unpleasant stimuli. A widely known example is the emotional variant of the colour-naming Stroop task. Although participants are not instructed to attend to valence, it nevertheless influences response times. We studied how persons differ in ignoring the irrelevant valence of stimuli and how such differences are related to personality traits. In two emotional Stroop tasks using a vocal response mode, participants were instructed to name the colour of unpleasant and pleasant words presented in different physical colours. In Study 2, we introduced a second task to increase the cognitive load. Across both studies, extraversion and approach temperament were associated with higher interferences by pleasant words. Neuroticism and avoidance temperament, however, were associated with higher interferences by unpleasant words only when cognitive load increased because of a task switch. This finding suggests that highly neurotic individuals can mitigate influences of emotional stimuli on information processing under conditions of low cognitive load. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
REFERENCES
- Akbari Chermahini, S., & Hommel, B. (in press). Creative mood swings: Divergent and convergent thinking affect mood in opposite ways. Psychological Research.
- Algom, D., Chajut, E., & Lev, S. (2004). A rational look at the emotional Stroop phenomenon: A generic slowdown, not a Stroop effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 133, 323–338.
- Amodio, D. M., Master, S. L., Yee, C. M., & Taylor, S. E. (2008). Neurocognitive components of the behavioral inhibition and activation systems: Implications for theories of self-regulation. Psychophysiology, 45, 11–19.
- Bar-Haim, Y., Lamy, D., Pergamin, L., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2007). Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: A meta-analytic study. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 1–24.
- Beck, A. T., & Steer, R. A. (1987). Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation Inc.
- Birk, J. L., Dennis, T. A., Shin, L. M., & Urry, H. L. (2011). Threat facilitates subsequent executive control during anxious mood. Emotion, 11, 1291–1304.
- Blair, I. V., Urland, G. R., & Ma, J. E. (2002). Using Internet search engines to estimate word frequency. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 34, 286–290.
- Borkenau, P., Paelecke, M., & Yu, R. (2010). Personality and lexical decision times for evaluative words. European Journal of Personality, 24, 123–136.
- Botvinick, M., Braver, T., Barch, D., Carter, C., & Cohen, J. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624–652.
- Brosschot, J. F., de Ruiter, C., & Kindt, M. (1999). Processing bias in anxious subjects and repressors, measured by emotional Stroop interference and attentional allocation. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 777–793.
- Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral-inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319–333.
- Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO PI-R professional manual. Orlando, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
- Dennis, T. A., & Chen, C. (2007). Emotional face processing and attention performance in three domains: Neurophysiological mechanisms and moderating effects of trait anxiety. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 65, 10–19.
- Dennis, T. A., Chen, C., & McCandliss, B. D. (2008). Threat-related attentional biases: An analysis of three attention networks. Depression and Anxiety, 25, E1–E10.
- Dennis, T. A., & Chen, C. (2009). Trait anxiety and conflict monitoring following threat: An ERP study. Psychophysiology, 46, 122–131.
- Derryberry, D., & Reed, M. A. (1994). Temperament and attention: Orienting toward and away from positive and negative signals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 1128–1139.
- DeYoung, C. G., Hirsh, J. B., Shane, M. S., Papademetris, X., Rajeevan, N., & Gray, J. R. (2010). Testing predictions from personality neuroscience: Brain structure and the big five. Psychological Science, 21, 820–828.
- Egloff, B., & Hock, M. (2001). Interactive effects of state anxiety and trait anxiety on emotional Stroop interference. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 875–882.
- Egloff, B., & Hock, M. (2003). Assessing attention allocation toward threat-related stimuli: A comparison of the emotional Stroop task and the attentional probe task. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 475–483.
- Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Approach-avoidance motivation in personality: Approach and avoidance temperaments and goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 804–818.
- Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2010). Approach and avoidance temperament as basic dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality, 78, 865–906.
- Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Sommer, T., Raz, A., & Posner, M. I. (2002). Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 340–347.
- Frings, C., Englert, J., Wentura, D., & Bermeitinger, C. (2010). Decomposing the emotional Stroop effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 42–49.
- Hautzinger, M., Bailer, M., Worall, H., & Keller, F. (1995). Beck- Depressions-Inventar (BDI) [Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)]. Bern (Switzerland): Huber.
- Huster, R. J., Wolters, C., Wollbrink, A., Schweiger, E., Wittling, W., Pantev, C., & Junghofer, M. (2009). Effects of anterior cingulate fissurization on cognitive control during Stroop interference. Human Brain Mapping, 30, 1279–1289.
- Krohne, H. W., Egloff, B., Kohlmann, C., & Tausch, A. (1996). Untersuchungen mit einer deutschen Version der ‘Positive and Negative Affect Schedule’ (PANAS) [Studies on a German version of the ‘Positive and Negative Affect Schedule’ (PANAS)]. Diagnostica, 42, 139–156.
- Larsen, R. J., Mercer, K. A., & Balota, D. A. (2006). Lexical characteristics of words used in emotional Stroop experiments. Emotion, 6, 62–72.
- Lavie, N. (2005). Distracted and confused?: Selective attention under load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 75–82.
- Lucas, R. E., & Diener, E. (2001). Understanding extraverts' enjoyment of social situations: the importance of pleasantness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 343–356.
- MacLeod, C. M., Mathews, A., & Tata, P. (1986). Attentional bias in emotional disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 15–20.
- Mauer, N. (2006). Subjektives Wohlbefinden und die Verarbeitung valenzträchtiger Informationen [Subjective well-being and the processing of valent information]. Hamburg (Germany): Dr. Kovač.
- Mauer, N., & Borkenau, P. (2007). Temperament and early information processing: Temperament-related attentional bias in emotional Stroop tasks. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1063–1073.
- McClain, L. (1983). Effects of response type and set size on Stroop color-word performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 56, 735–743.
- McKenna, F. P., & Sharma, D. (2004). Reversing the emotional Stroop effect reveals that it is not what it seems: The role of fast and slow components. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 382–392.
- Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 134–140.
- Moriya, J., & Tanno, Y. (2009). Dysfunction of attentional networks for non-emotional processing in negative affect. Cognition And Emotion, 23, 1090–1105.
- Ostendorf, F., & Angleitner, A. (2004). NEO-PI-R: NEO-Persönlichkeitsinventar nach Costa und McCrae [NEO Personality Inventory according to Costa and McCrae]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
- Pacheco-Unguetti, A. P., Acosta, A., Marqués, E., & Lupiáñez, J. (2011). Alterations of the attentional networks in patients with anxiety disorders. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 25(7), 888–895.
- Paelecke-Habermann, Y., Pohl, J., & Leplow, B. (2005). Attention and executive functions in remitted major depression patients. Journal of Affective Disorders, 89(1–3), 125–135.
- Phillips, L. H., Bull, R., Adams, E., & Fraser, L. (2002). Positive mood and executive function: Evidence from Stroop and fluency tasks. Emotion, 2, 12–22.
- Posner, M. I., & Fan, J. (2004). Attention as an organ system. In J. R. Pomerantz, & M. C. Crair (Eds.), Topics in integrative neuroscience: From cells to cognition (pp. 31–61). Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
- Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods ( 2nd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., & Congdon, R. (2004). HLM6: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modelling [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
- Redding, G. M., & Gerjets, D. A. (1977). Stroop effect: Interference and facilitation with verbal and manual responses. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 45, 11–17.
- Reinholdt-Dunne, M. L., Mogg, K., & Bradley, B. P. (2009). Effects of anxiety and attention control on processing pictorial and linguistic emotional information. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 47, 410–417.
-
Richards, A.,
French, C. C.,
Johnson, W.,
Naparstek, J., &
Williams, J. (1992). Effects of mood manipulation and anxiety on performance of an emotional Stroop task. British Journal of Psychology, 83, 479–491.
10.1111/j.2044-8295.1992.tb02454.x Google Scholar
- Rusting, C. L. (1998). Personality, mood, and cognitive processing of emotional information: Three conceptual frameworks. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 165–196.
- Rusting, C. L. (1999). Interactive effects of personality and mood on emotion-congruent memory and judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1073–1086.
- Rusting, C. L., & Larsen, R. J. (1998). Personality and cognitive processing of affective information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 200–213.
- Segerstrom, S. C. (2001). Optimism and attentional bias for negative and positive stimuli. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1334–1343.
- Shackman, A. J., Salomons, T. V., Slagter, H. A., Fox, A. S., Winter, J. J., & Davidson, R. J. (2011). The integration of negative affect, pain and cognitive control in the cingulate cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 12, 154.
- Sharma, D., & McKenna, F. P. (1998). Differential components of the manual and vocal Stroop tasks. Memory and Cognition, 26, 1033–1040.
-
Strobel, A.,
Beauducel, A.,
Debener, S., &
Brocke, B. (2001). Eine deutschsprachige Version des BIS/BAS-Fragebogens von Carver und White [A German-language version of Carver and White's BIS/BAS scales]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 22, 216–227.
10.1024//0170-1789.22.3.216 Google Scholar
- Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal Of Experimental Psychology, 28, 643–662.
- Tamir, M., & Robinson, M. D. (2007). The happy spotlight: Positive mood and selective attention to rewarding information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1124–1136.
- Van Honk, J., Tuiten, A., van den Hout, M., Putman, P., de Haan, E., & Stam, H. (2001). Selective attention to unmasked and masked threatening words: Relationships to trait anger and anxiety. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 711–720.
-
Watson, D., &
Clark, L. A. (1997). Extraversion and its positive emotional core. In R. Hogan, J. Johnson, & S. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 767–793). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
10.1016/B978-012134645-4/50030-5 Google Scholar
- Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1999). Issues in the dimensional structure of affect—Effects of descriptors, measurement error, and response formats: Comment on Russell and Carroll (1999). Psychological Bulletin, 125, 601–610.
- Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.
- West, S. G., Aiken, L. S., & Krull, J. L. (1996). Experimental personality designs: Analyzing categorical by continuous variable interactions. Journal of Personality, 64, 1–48.
- Williams, J. M. G., Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. M. (1996). The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 3–24.
- Williams, P. G., Suchy, Y., & Rau, H. K. (2009). Individual differences in executive functioning: Implications for stress regulation. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 37, 126–140.
- Wilt, J., Noftle, E. E., Fleeson, W., & Spain, J. S. (in press). The dynamic role of personality states in mediating the relationship between extraversion and positive affect. Journal of Personality.
- Wood, J., Mathews, A., & Dalgleish, T. (2001). Anxiety and cognitive inhibition. Emotion, 1, 166–181.
- Zhou, J., Gao, T., Zhang, Y., Liang, J., Shui, R., & Shen, M. (2011). Losing control in front of a fearful face: The effect of emotional information on cognitive control. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 1187–1199.