Volume 34, Issue 2 e70118
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Opioid Use After Hip Fracture and Subsequent Fracture Outcomes: A Self-Controlled Case Series Design

Meghan A. Cupp

Corresponding Author

Meghan A. Cupp

Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA

Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA

Correspondence:

Meghan A. Cupp ([email protected])

Search for more papers by this author
Kaleen N. Hayes

Kaleen N. Hayes

Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Sarah D. Berry

Sarah D. Berry

Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Francesca L. Beaudoin

Francesca L. Beaudoin

Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA

Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Melissa R. Riester

Melissa R. Riester

Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Richa Joshi

Richa Joshi

Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Andrew R. Zullo

Andrew R. Zullo

Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA

Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA

Center of Innovation in Long-Term Services and Supports, Providence Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island, USA

Department of Pharmacy, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 14 February 2025

Funding: This work was supported by National Institute on Aging grant R21AG061632 to A.R.Z. and F.L.B. and by K24AG070106 to S.D.B. Dr. Zullo is also supported, in part, by National Institute on Aging grants R01AG065722 and R01AG077620.

ABSTRACT

Purpose

Hip fractures in older adults cause severe pain that often necessitates opioid use. However, opioids may trigger falls that result in subsequent fractures. Studies examining the effects of opioids on subsequent fractures are often limited by unmeasured confounding between opioid-treated and untreated persons. To overcome this limitation, we used a self-controlled case series (SCCS) design to investigate subsequent fracture risk during periods of opioid use after hip fracture.

Methods

The retrospective cohort included Medicare beneficiaries aged > 65 years who had a subsequent hip fracture within one year after an incident hip fracture (2012–2018). We estimated the risk of subsequent hip fracture in three exposure intervals according to the duration of opioid exposure: (1) The first 0–14 days of opioid exposure, (2) days 15–42 of exposure, and (3) opioid use beyond 42 days. We employed several approaches to modify the SCCS design to be more robust to assumptions, including adjustment for event-dependent exposures.

Results

The rate of subsequent fracture was greatest during opioid use across a variety of approaches. The effect within the first 14 days after initiating opioids was robust to SCCS design choices, ranging from IRR 1.12 (95%CLs 0.98, 1.28) to IRR 1.77 (95%CLs 1.52, 2.07). The effect of extended opioid use (> 42 days) ranged from IRR 2.49 (95%CLs 1.95, 3.18) to IRR 4.08 (95%CLs 3.06, 5.46).

Conclusions

Analyses indicate a consistent increased risk of subsequent fracture associated with opioid use and demonstrate the importance that SCCS assumptions must be carefully investigated for real-world applications.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.