Focusing on the positive or the negative: Self-construal moderates negativity bias in impression updating
Dandan Xie
School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
Search for more papers by this authorSuya Chen
School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Yanhong Wu
School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health; Key Laboratory of Machine Perception, Ministry of Education, Peking University, Beijing, China
Correspondence
Yanhong Wu, Wangkezhen Building, Peking University, Yiheyuan Road No. 5, Haidian District, Beijing 100871, China.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorDandan Xie
School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
Search for more papers by this authorSuya Chen
School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Yanhong Wu
School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health; Key Laboratory of Machine Perception, Ministry of Education, Peking University, Beijing, China
Correspondence
Yanhong Wu, Wangkezhen Building, Peking University, Yiheyuan Road No. 5, Haidian District, Beijing 100871, China.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Negativity bias refers to the phenomenon whereby people put more weight on negative information. Although evolutionarily favorable for survival, negative bias in impression processing is detrimental to relationships and cooperation. To explore whether the motivation to maintain relationships, indicated by self-construal, mitigates negativity bias, two studies were conducted. In study 1, participants interacted with three agents (worsened, improved, baseline) in a modified social learning task and evaluated the moral level of these agents. Results showed that positivity bias appeared among interdependent individuals, with larger updating for the improved agent than for the worsened agent. Moreover, interdependent individuals exhibited less immediate decreases toward the worsened agent and steeper increases toward the improved agent than did independent individuals. To validate the results of study 1, we used a narrative description paradigm in study 2. Participants read the behavior descriptions of agents and rated them on morality. The negativity bias was significantly mitigated among individuals with high interdependence, though it did not reverse. These results indicate that interdependent individuals focus more on positive information when others change, yielding a more positive pattern in impression updating. This flexible interpersonal coping strategy can bring advantages to social interaction and cooperation.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Supporting Information
Filename | Description |
---|---|
pchj651-sup-0001-Supinfo.docxWord 2007 document , 46.7 KB | DATA S1. Supporting Information. |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
REFERENCES
- Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
- Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4 (arXiv:1406.5823). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1406.5823
10.48550/arXiv.1406.5823 Google Scholar
- Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323
10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323 Google Scholar
- Ben-Ner, A., & Halldorsson, F. (2010). Trusting and trustworthiness: What are they, how to measure them, and what affects them. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(1), 64–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2009.10.001
- Bliese, P. D., Kautz, J., & Lang, J. W. B. (2020). Discontinuous growth models: Illustrations, recommendations, and an R function for generating the design matrix. In Y. Griep & S. Hansen (Eds.), Handbook on the temporal dynamics of organizational behavior (pp. 319–350). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788974387.00030
10.4337/9781788974387.00030 Google Scholar
- Bliese, P. D., & Lang, J. W. B. (2016). Understanding relative and absolute change in discontinuous growth models: Coding alternatives and implications for hypothesis testing. Organizational Research Methods, 19(4), 562–592. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116633502
- Brauer, M., & Curtin, J. J. (2018). Linear mixed-effects models and the analysis of nonindependent data: A unified framework to analyze categorical and continuous independent variables that vary within-subjects and/or within-items. Psychological Methods, 23(3), 389–411. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000159
- Brewer, M. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: In-group love or out-group hate. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00126
- Bruce, V., & Young, A. (1986). Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 77(3), 305–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1986.tb02199.x
- Carstensen, L. L., Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (1995). Emotional behavior in long-term marriage. Psychology and Aging, 10(1), 140–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.10.1.140
- Castle, E., Eisenberger, N. I., Seeman, T. E., Moons, W. G., Boggero, I. A., Grinblatt, M. S., & Taylor, S. E. (2012). Neural and behavioral bases of age differences in perceptions of trust. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(51), 20848–20852. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1218518109
- Chen, G., Gao, X., Yan, X., Du, M., Zang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2023). Online Research in Psychology and its Future in China. CSTR:32003.36.ChinaXiv.202206.00150.V2
- Crockett, M. J., Everett, J. A. C., Gill, M., & Siegel, J. Z. (2021). The relational logic of moral inference. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 64, pp. 1–64). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2021.04.001
- Crockett, M. J., Kurth-Nelson, Z., Siegel, J. Z., Dayan, P., & Dolan, R. J. (2014). Harm to others outweighs harm to self in moral decision making. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(48), 17320–17325. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1408988111
- Cross, S. E., Hardin, E. E., & Gercek-Swing, B. (2011). The what, how, why, and where of self-construal. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(2), 142–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310373752
- Devaraj, S., & Jiang, K. (2019). It's about time – A longitudinal adaptation model of high-performance work teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(3), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000372
- Fudenberg, D., Rand, D. G., & Dreber, A. (2012). Slow to anger and fast to forgive: Cooperation in an uncertain world. American Economic Review, 102(2), 720–749. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.2.720
- Fulmer, C. A., & Gelfand, M. J. (2015). Trust after violations: Are collectivists more or less forgiving? Journal of Trust Research, 5(2), 109–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2015.1051050
10.1080/21515581.2015.1051050 Google Scholar
- Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293(5537), 2105–2108. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1062872
- Hamlin, J. K., Wynn, K., & Bloom, P. (2010). Three-month-olds show a negativity bias in their social evaluations. Developmental Science, 13(6), 923–929. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00951.x
- Hehman, E., Sutherland, C. A. M., Flake, J. K., & Slepian, M. L. (2017). The unique contributions of perceiver and target characteristics in person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(4), 513–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000090
- Hester, N., Xie, S. Y., & Hehman, E. (2021). Little between-region and between-country variance when people form impressions of others. Psychological Science, 32(12), 1907–1917. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976211019950
- Howe, M. (2019). General mental ability and goal type as antecedents of recurrent adaptive task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(6), 796–813. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000379
- Hughes, B. L., & Zaki, J. (2015). The neuroscience of motivated cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(2), 62–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.12.006
- Hughes, B. L., Zaki, J., & Ambady, N. (2017). Motivation alters impression formation and related neural systems. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsw147
- Johnson, D. D. P., Blumstein, D. T., Fowler, J. H., & Haselton, M. G. (2013). The evolution of error: Error management, cognitive constraints, and adaptive decision-making biases. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 28(8), 474–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2013.05.014
- Johnson, D. D. P., & Tierney, D. (2018). Bad world: The negativity bias in international politics. International Security, 43(3), 96–140. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00336
- Kensinger, E. A., & Corkin, S. (2003). Memory enhancement for emotional words: Are emotional words more vividly remembered than neutral words? Memory & Cognition, 31, 1169–1180. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195800
- Kim, M. J., Mende-Siedlecki, P., Anzellotti, S., & Young, L. (2021). Theory of mind following the violation of strong and weak prior beliefs. Cerebral Cortex, 31(2), 884–898. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhaa263
- Kim, M., Park, B., & Young, L. (2020). The psychology of motivated versus rational impression updating. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(2), 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.12.001
- Kitayama, S., Park, H., Sevincer, A. T., Karasawa, M., & Uskul, A. K. (2009). A cultural task analysis of implicit independence: Comparing North America, Western Europe, and East Asia. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(2), 236–255. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015999
- Komissarouk, S., & Nadler, A. (2014). “I” seek autonomy, “we” rely on each other: Self-construal and regulatory focus as determinants of autonomy- and dependency-oriented help-seeking behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(6), 726–738. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214524444
- Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
- LaHuis, D. M., & Ferguson, M. W. (2009). The accuracy of significance tests for slope variance components in multilevel random coefficient models. Organizational Research Methods, 12(3), 418–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428107308984
- Lemay, E. P., & Clark, M. S. (2015). Motivated cognition in relationships. Current Opinion in Psychology, 1, 72–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2014.11.002
- Liu, Y., Wu, B., Petti, C., Wu, X., & Han, S. (2018). Self-construals moderate associations between trait creativity and social brain network. Neuropsychologia, 111, 284–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.02.012
- Lopes, P. N., Salovey, P., & Straus, R. (2003). Emotional intelligence, personality, and the perceived quality of social relationships. Personality and Individual Differences, 35(3), 641–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00242-8
- Ma, Y., Wang, C., Li, B., Zhang, W., Rao, Y., & Han, S. (2014). Does self-construal predict activity in the social brain network? A genetic moderation effect. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(9), 1360–1367. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nst125
- Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
- Masuda, T., Ellsworth, P. C., Mesquita, B., Leu, J., Tanida, S., & Van de Veerdonk, E. (2008). Placing the face in context: Cultural differences in the perception of facial emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(3), 365–381. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.3.365
- Mattarozzi, K., Todorov, A., Marzocchi, M., Vicari, A., & Russo, P. M. (2015). Effects of gender and personality on first impression. PLoS One, 10(9), e0135529. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135529
- McCullough, M. (2008). Beyond revenge: The evolution of the forgiveness instinct. John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated.
- Mende-Siedlecki, P., Baron, S. G., & Todorov, A. (2013). Diagnostic value underlies asymmetric updating of impressions in the morality and ability domains. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(50), 19406–19415. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2334-13.2013
- Mende-Siedlecki, P., & Todorov, A. (2016). Neural dissociations between meaningful and mere inconsistency in impression updating. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(9), 1489–1500. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsw058
- Meng, X., Mu, Y., & Luo, Y. L. L. (2022). Self-construal and generalized trust predict first impressions from faces. Personality and Individual Differences, 191, 111537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111537
- Miller, J. G. (1984). Culture and the development of everyday social explanation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(5), 961–978. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.5.961
- Milyavskaya, M., Reoch, J., Koestner, R. F., & Losier, G. F. (2010). Seeking social connectedness: Interdependent self-construal and impression formation using photographic cues of social connectedness. The Journal of Social Psychology, 150(6), 689–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540903365406
- Monga, A. B., & John, D. R. (2008). When does negative brand publicity hurt? The moderating influence of analytic versus holistic thinking. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18(4), 320–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2008.09.009
- Monga, A. B., & John, D. R. (2010). What makes brands elastic? The influence of brand concept and styles of thinking on brand extension evaluation. Journal of Marketing, 74(3), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.74.3.080
- Monroe, A. E., & Malle, B. F. (2019). People systematically update moral judgments of blame. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116(2), 215–236. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000137
- Moscardino, U., Miconi, D., & Carraro, L. (2020). Implicit and explicit self-construals in Chinese-heritage and Italian nonimmigrant early adolescents: Associations with self-esteem and prosocial behavior. Developmental Psychology, 56(7), 1397–1412. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000937
- Neuberg, S. L., & Fiske, S. T. (1987). Motivational influences on impression formation: Outcome dependency, accuracy-driven attention, and individuating processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(3), 431–444. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.431
- Niessen, C., & Jimmieson, N. L. (2016). Threat of resource loss: The role of self-regulation in adaptive task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(3), 450–462. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000049
- Niessen, C., & Lang, J. W. B. (2021). Cognitive control strategies and adaptive performance in a complex work task. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(10), 1586–1599. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000830
- Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108(2), 291–310. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.291
- Nowak, M. A. (2006). Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science, 314(5805), 1560–1563. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1133755
- Nowak, M. A., & Sigmund, K. (1992). Tit for tat in heterogeneous populations. Nature, 355(6357), 250–253. https://doi.org/10.1038/355250a0
- Oetzel, J. G. (1998). Explaining individual communication processes in homogeneous and heterogeneous groups through individualism-collectivism and self-construal. Human Communication Research, 25(2), 202–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1998.tb00443.x
- Öhman, A., Flykt, A., & Esteves, F. (2001). Emotion drives attention: Detecting the snake in the grass. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(3), 466–478. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.130.3.466
- Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 3–72. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.3
- Park, B., Fareri, D., Delgado, M., & Young, L. (2021). The role of right temporoparietal junction in processing social prediction error across relationship contexts. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 16(8), 772–781. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaa072
- Park, B., & Young, L. (2020). An association between biased impression updating and relationship facilitation: A behavioral and fMRI investigation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 87, 103916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103916
- Peirce, J., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., Kastman, E., & Lindeløv, J. K. (2019). PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y
- Pfundmair, M., Aydin, N., Du, H., Yeung, S., Frey, D., & Graupmann, V. (2015). Exclude me if you can: Cultural effects on the outcomes of social exclusion. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46(4), 579–596. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022115571203
- Pfundmair, M., Graupmann, V., Frey, D., & Aydin, N. (2015). The different behavioral intentions of collectivists and individualists in response to social exclusion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(3), 363–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214566186
- Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D., & Team, R. C. (2018). nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-137. R Foundation.
- Rand, D. G., Ohtsuki, H., & Nowak, M. A. (2009). Direct reciprocity with costly punishment: Generous tit-for-tat prevails. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 256(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.09.015
- Richels, K. A., Day, E. A., Jorgensen, A. G., & Huck, J. T. (2020). Keeping calm and carrying on: Relating affect spin and pulse to complex skill acquisition and adaptive performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 377. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00377
- Schupp, H. T., Öhman, A., Junghöfer, M., Weike, A. I., Stockburger, J., & Hamm, A. O. (2004). The facilitated processing of threatening faces: An ERP analysis. Emotion, 4(2), 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.4.2.189
- Siegel, J. Z., Curwell-Parry, O., Pearce, S., Saunders, K. E. A., & Crockett, M. J. (2020). A computational phenotype of disrupted moral inference in borderline personality disorder. Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging, 5(12), 1134–1141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2020.07.013
- Siegel, J. Z., Mathys, C., Rutledge, R. B., & Crockett, M. J. (2018). Beliefs about bad people are volatile. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(10), 750–756. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0425-1
- Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-Construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 580–591. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167294205014
- Singer, J. D., Willett, J. B., Willett, C. W. E. P. J. B., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. Oxford University Press.
- Skowronski, J. J., & Carlston, D. E. (1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 105(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.1.131
- Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (2011). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. SAGE.
10.1007/978-3-642-04898-2_387 Google Scholar
- Tu, K., Chen, S., & Mesler, R. M. (2021). Trait self-construal, inclusion of others in the self and self-control predict stay-at-home adherence during COVID-19. Personality and Individual Differences, 175, 110687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110687
- Vaish, A., Grossmann, T., & Woodward, A. (2008). Not all emotions are created equal: The negativity bias in social-emotional development. Psychological Bulletin, 134(3), 383–403. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.383
- Vorauer, J. D., & Sucharyna, T. A. (2013). Potential negative effects of perspective-taking efforts in the context of close relationships: Increased bias and reduced satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(1), 70–86. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030184
- Wentura, D., Rothermund, K., & Bak, P. (2000). Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of approach- and avoidance-related social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(6), 1024–1037. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.6.1024
- West, T. V., & Kenny, D. A. (2011). The truth and bias model of judgment. Psychological Review, 118(2), 357–378. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022936
- Willis, M. L., Dodd, H. F., & Palermo, R. (2013). The relationship between anxiety and the social judgements of approachability and trustworthiness. PLoS One, 8(10), e76825. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076825
- Xie, S. Y., Flake, J. K., & Hehman, E. (2019). Perceiver and target characteristics contribute to impression formation differently across race and gender. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(2), 364–385. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000160
- Yeo, G. B., & Neal, A. (2004). A multilevel analysis of effort, practice, and performance: Effects; of ability, conscientiousness, and goal orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(2), 231–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.2.231