Volume 30, Issue 7 pp. 1319-1324
Original Clinical Article

Minimum important difference for validated instruments in women with urge incontinence

Keisha Y. Dyer

Corresponding Author

Keisha Y. Dyer

Department of Reproductive Medicine, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, California

University of California, San Diego, Women's Pelvic Medicine Center, 9350 Campus Point Dr., Ste. 2A, La Jolla, CA 92037-1300.Search for more papers by this author
Yan Xu

Yan Xu

New England Research Institutes, Watertown, Massachusetts

Search for more papers by this author
Linda Brubaker

Linda Brubaker

Departments of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Urology, Loyola University, Chicago, Illinois

Search for more papers by this author
Ingrid Nygaard

Ingrid Nygaard

Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Utah, Salt Lake, Utah

Search for more papers by this author
Alayne Markland

Alayne Markland

Department of Veterans Affairs & Departments of Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama

Search for more papers by this author
David Rahn

David Rahn

Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Texas, Southwestern, Dallas, Texas

Search for more papers by this author
Toby C. Chai

Toby C. Chai

Department of Urology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland

Search for more papers by this author
Ann Stoddard

Ann Stoddard

New England Research Institutes, Watertown, Massachusetts

Search for more papers by this author
Emily Lukacz

Emily Lukacz

Department of Reproductive Medicine, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, California

Search for more papers by this author
for the Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network (UITN)

for the Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network (UITN)

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 11 May 2011
Citations: 38

Conflicts of interest: none.

Christopher Chapple led the review process.

Abstract

Aims

Minimum important difference (MID) estimates the minimum degree of change in an instrument's score that correlates with subjective sense of improvement. The aim of this study was to estimate the MID for the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI), Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ) and Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) using anchor and distribution-based approaches in patients with urge-predominant incontinence and whether MID changes over time.

Methods

This was a sub-analysis of a multi-center trial of 307 women with pure urge (11) or urge-predominant (296) incontinence who completed condition-specific instruments 10 weeks and 8 months after randomization to anticholinergic medication with or without behavioral therapy. We applied anchor-based methods only when the Kendall's rank correlations between the anchors (Global Perception of Improvement (GPI), Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ), and incontinence episodes) and the incontinence instruments (UDI, UDI irritative subscale, IIQ, and OAB-q subscales) were ≥0.3. We applied three distribution-based methods to all instruments: effect sizes of ±0.2 SD (small) and ±0.5 SD (medium), and standard error of measurement of ±1. Analyses were performed at both time points.

Results

Anchor-based MIDs for the UDI ranged from −35 to −45 and −15 to −25 for the irritative subscale distribution-based methods MIDs for UDI and IIQ ranged between −10 to −25 and −19 to −49, respectively, reflective of a reduction in bother and symptom severity (SS). OAB-q subscale MIDs ranged from +5 to +12, denoting improved quality of life (HRQL) and −13 to −25, consistent with a reduction in SS.

Conclusions

The MID in women with urge-predominant UI for the UDI and UDI irritative are −35 and −15. Our findings are consistent with previously reported MIDs for the OAB-q subscales. Distribution-based method MIDs are lower values than anchor-based values. The MID did not typically change over the time. Neurourol. Urodynam. 30:1319–1324, 2011. © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.