Volume 55, Issue 1 pp. 77-83
Clinical Research

Utility of maximum perfusion intensity as an ultrasonographic marker of intraneural blood flow

Adeniyi A. Borire MBBS

Adeniyi A. Borire MBBS

Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Leo H. Visser MD, PhD

Leo H. Visser MD, PhD

St. Elisabeth Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Luca Padua MD, PhD

Luca Padua MD, PhD

Department of Geriatrics, Neurosciences, and Orthopedics, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy

Don Gnocchi Foundation, Milan, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
James G. Colebatch DSc

James G. Colebatch DSc

Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Institute of Neurological Sciences, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
William Huynh MBBS, PhD

William Huynh MBBS, PhD

Institute of Neurological Sciences, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Neil G. Simon MBBS, PhD

Neil G. Simon MBBS, PhD

Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

St. Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Matthew C. Kiernan DSc

Matthew C. Kiernan DSc

Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Arun V. Krishnan MBBS, PhD

Corresponding Author

Arun V. Krishnan MBBS, PhD

Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Institute of Neurological Sciences, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Correspondence to: A. Krishnan; e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
First published: 26 May 2016
Citations: 29

ABSTRACT

We quantified intraneural blood flow (INBF) using perfusion measurement software (PixelFlux), and compared it with the qualitative method of counting blood vessels (vessel score) in a cohort of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) patients. Methods: Forty-seven patients (67 wrists) with a clinical and electrophysiological diagnosis of CTS, and 20 healthy controls (40 wrists) were enrolled. Median nerve ultrasound (US) was performed at the carpal tunnel inlet to measure the cross-sectional area (CSA) and vessel score. Power Doppler sonograms from nerves with detectable INBF were processed with PixelFlux to obtain the maximum perfusion intensity (MPI). Results: Forty-nine percent of CTS patients had detectable INBF compared with none in the control group (P < 0.0001). MPI correlated significantly with vessel score (r = 0.945, P < 0.0001), CSA (r = 0.613, P < 0.0001), and electrophysiological severity (r = 0.440, P < 0.0001). MPI had higher intra- or interobserver reliability compared with vessel score (0.95 vs. 0.47). Conclusion: MPI is a better method for quantification of INBF. Muscle Nerve, 2016 Muscle Nerve 55: 77–83, 2017

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

click me