Microfabricated high-moment micrometer-sized MRI contrast agents
Corresponding Author
Gary Zabow
Laboratory of Functional and Molecular Imaging, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
Electromagnetics Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, Colorado, USA
NIH/NINDS/LFMI, 10 Center Drive, MSC 1065, Building 10, Room B1D728, Bethesda, MD 20892-1065===Search for more papers by this authorStephen J. Dodd
Laboratory of Functional and Molecular Imaging, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
Search for more papers by this authorErik Shapiro
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
Search for more papers by this authorJohn Moreland
Electromagnetics Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, Colorado, USA
Search for more papers by this authorAlan P. Koretsky
Laboratory of Functional and Molecular Imaging, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Gary Zabow
Laboratory of Functional and Molecular Imaging, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
Electromagnetics Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, Colorado, USA
NIH/NINDS/LFMI, 10 Center Drive, MSC 1065, Building 10, Room B1D728, Bethesda, MD 20892-1065===Search for more papers by this authorStephen J. Dodd
Laboratory of Functional and Molecular Imaging, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
Search for more papers by this authorErik Shapiro
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
Search for more papers by this authorJohn Moreland
Electromagnetics Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, Colorado, USA
Search for more papers by this authorAlan P. Koretsky
Laboratory of Functional and Molecular Imaging, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
While chemically synthesized superparamagnetic microparticles have enabled much new research based on MRI tracking of magnetically labeled cells, signal-to-noise levels still limit the potential range of applications. Here it is shown how, through top-down microfabrication, contrast agent relaxivity can be increased several-fold, which should extend the sensitivity of such cell-tracking studies. Microfabricated agents can benefit from both higher magnetic moments and higher uniformity than their chemically synthesized counterparts, implying increased label visibility and more quantitative image analyses. To assess the performance of microfabricated micrometer-sized contrast agent particles, analytic models and numerical simulations are developed and tested against new microfabricated agents described in this article, as well as against results of previous imaging studies of traditional chemically synthesized microparticle agents. Experimental data showing signal effects of 500-nm thick, 2-μm diameter, gold-coated iron and gold-coated nickel disks verify the simulations. Additionally, it is suggested that measures of location better than the pixel resolution can be obtained and that these are aided using well-defined contrast agent particles achievable through microfabrication techniques. Magn Reson Med, 2011. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
REFERENCES
- 1 Dodd SJ, Williams M, Suhan JP, Williams DS, Koretsky AP, Ho C. Detection of single mammalian cells by high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Biophys J 1999; 76: 103–109.
- 2 Bulte JWM, Kraitchman DL. Iron oxide MR contrast agents for molecular and cellular imaging. NMR Biomed 2004; 17: 484–499.
- 3 Foster-Gareau P, Heyn C, Alejski A, Rutt BK. Imaging single mammalian cells with a 1.5 T clinical MRI scanner. Magn Reson Med 2003; 49: 968–971.
- 4 Heyn C, Ronald JA, Mackenzie LT, MacDonald IC, Chambers AF, Rutt BK, Foster PJ. In vivo magnetic resonance imaging of single cells in mouse brain with optical validation. Magn Reson Med 2006; 55: 23–29.
- 5 Hinds KA, Hill JM, Shapiro EM, Laukkanen MO, Silva AC, Combs CA, Varney TR, Balaban RS, Koretsky AP, Dunbar CE. Highly efficient endosomal labeling of progenitor and stem cells with large magnetic particles allows magnetic resonance imaging of single cells. Blood 2003; 102: 867–872.
- 6 Wu YL, Ye Q, Foley LM, Hitchens TK, Sato K, Williams JB, Ho C. In situ labeling of immune cells with iron oxide particles: an approach to detect organ rejection by cellular MRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103: 1852–1857.
- 7 Shapiro EM, Skrtic S, Sharer K, Hill JM, Dunbar CE, Koretsky AP. MRI detection of single particles for cellular imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101: 10901–10906.
- 8 Shapiro EM, Skrtic S, Koretsky AP. Sizing it up: cellular MRI using micron-sized iron oxide particles. Magn Reson Med 2005; 53: 329–338.
- 9 Shapiro EM, Sharer K, Skrtic S, Koretsky AP. In vivo detection of single cells by MRI. Magn Reson Med 2006; 55: 242–249.
- 10 Juan JY, Tracy K, Zhang LH, Munasinghe J, Shapiro E, Koretsky A, Kelly K. Noninvasive imaging of the functional effects of anti-VEGF therapy on tumor cell extravasation and regional blood volume in an experimental brain metastasis model. Clin Exp Metastasis 2009; 26: 403–414.
- 11 Sumner JP, Shapiro EM, Maric D, Conroy R, Koretsky AP. In vivo labeling of adult neural progenitors for MRI with micron sized particles of iron oxide: Quantification of labeled cell phenotype. Neuroimage 2009; 44: 671–678.
- 12 Zabow G, Dodd S, Moreland J, Koretsky A. Micro-engineered local field control for high-sensitivity multispectral MRI. Nature 2008; 453: 1058–1063.
- 13 Zabow G, Koretsky AP, Moreland J. Design and fabrication of a micromachined multispectral magnetic resonance imaging agent. J Micromech Microeng 2009; 19: 025020.
- 14 Zabow G, Dodd SJ, Moreland J, Koretsky AP. The fabrication of uniform cylindrical nanoshells and their use as spectrally tunable MRI contrast agents. Nanotechnology 2009; 20: 385301.
- 15 Brown RJS. Distribution of fields from randomly placed dipoles: free-precession signal decay as result of magnetic grains. Phys Rev 1961; 121: 1379–1382.
- 16 Yablonskiy DA, Haacke EM. Theory of NMR signal behavior in magnetically inhomogeneous tissues: the static dephasing regime. Magn Reson Med 1994; 32: 749–763.
- 17 Gillis P, Koenig SH. Transverse relaxation of solvent protons induced by magnetized spheres: application to ferritin, erythrocytes, and magnetite. Magn Reson Med 1987; 5: 323–345.
- 18 Cheng YN, Haacke EM, Yu YJ. An exact form for the magnetic field density of states for a dipole. Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 19: 1017–1023.
- 19 Seppenwoolde JH, van Zijtveld M, Bakker CJG. Spectral characterization of local magnetic field inhomogeneities. Phys Med Biol 2005; 50: 361–372.
- 20 Ziener CH, Kampf T, Melkus G, Herold V, Weber T, Reents G, Jakob PM, Bauer WR. Local frequency density of states around field inhomogeneities in magnetic resonance imaging: effects of diffusion. Phys Rev E 2007; 76: 031915.
- 21 Weisskoff RM, Zuo CS, Boxerman JL, Rosen BR. Microscopic susceptibility variation and transverse relaxation: theory and experiment. Magn Reson Med 1994; 31: 601–610.
- 22 Gillis P, Moiny F, Brooks RA. On T2-shortening by strongly magnetized spheres: a partial refocusing model. Magn Reson Med 2002; 47: 257–263.
- 23 Lüdeke KM, Röschmann P, Tischler R. Susceptibility artefacts in NMR imaging. Magn Reson Imag 1985; 3: 329–343.
- 24 Ericsson A, Hemmingsson A, Jung B, Sperber GO. Calculation of MRI artifacts caused by static field disturbances. Phys Med Biol 1988; 33: 1103–1112.
- 25 Callaghan PT. Susceptibility-limited resolution in nuclear magnetic resonance microscopy. J Magn Reson 1990; 87: 304–318
- 26 Posse S, Aue WP. Susceptibility artifacts in spin-echo and gradient-echo imaging. J Magn Reson 1990; 88: 473–492.
- 27 Bakker CJG, Bhagwandien R, Moerland MA, Ramos LMP. Simulation of susceptibility artifacts in 2D and 3D fourier transform spin-echo and gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 1994; 5: 767–774.
- 28 McCurrie RA. Ferromagnetic materials: structure and properties. London: Academic Press; 1994.
- 29 Ciocan R, Lenkinski RE, Bernstein J, Bancu M, Marquis R, Ivanishev A, Kourtelidis F, Matsui A, Borenstein J, Frangioni JV. MRI contrast using solid-state, B1-distorting, microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) microresonant devices (MRDs). Magn Reson Med 2009; 61: 860–866.
- 30
MJ Madou, editor.
Fundamentals of microfabrication: the science of miniaturization.
Florida:
CRC Press;
2002.
10.1201/9781482274004 Google Scholar