Efficiency of flow-driven adiabatic spin inversion under realistic experimental conditions: A computer simulation
Corresponding Author
Robert Trampel
Max Planck Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Leipzig, Germany
Max Planck Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Stephanstr. 1a, 04103 Leipzig, Germany===Search for more papers by this authorThies H. Jochimsen
Max Planck Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Leipzig, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorToralf Mildner
Max Planck Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Leipzig, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorDavid G. Norris
F.C. Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorHarald E. Möller
Max Planck Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Leipzig, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Robert Trampel
Max Planck Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Leipzig, Germany
Max Planck Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Stephanstr. 1a, 04103 Leipzig, Germany===Search for more papers by this authorThies H. Jochimsen
Max Planck Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Leipzig, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorToralf Mildner
Max Planck Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Leipzig, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorDavid G. Norris
F.C. Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorHarald E. Möller
Max Planck Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Leipzig, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Continuous arterial spin labeling (CASL) using adiabatic inversion is a widely used approach for perfusion imaging. For the quantification of perfusion, a reliable determination of the labeling efficiency is required. A numerical method for predicting the labeling efficiency in CASL experiments under various experimental conditions, including spin relaxation, is demonstrated. The approach is especially useful in the case of labeling at the carotid artery with a surface coil, as consideration of the experimental or theoretical profile of the B1 field is straightforward. Other effects that are also accounted for include deviations from a constant labeling gradient, and variations in the blood flow velocity due to the cardiac cycle. Assuming relevant experimental and physiological conditions, maximum inversion efficiencies of about 85% can be obtained. Magn Reson Med 51:1187–1193, 2004. © 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
REFERENCES
- 1 Detre JA, Leigh JS, Williams DS, Koretsky AP. Perfusion imaging. Magn Reson Med 1992; 23: 37–45.
- 2 Williams DS, Detre JA, Leigh JS, Koretsky AP. Magnetic resonance imaging of perfusion using spin inversion of arterial water. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992; 89: 212–216.
- 3 Dixon WT, Du LN, Faul DD, Gado M, Rossnick S. Projection angiograms of blood labeled by adiabatic fast passage. Magn Reson Med 1986; 3: 454–462.
- 4
Maccotta L,
Detre JA,
Alsop DC.
The efficiency of adiabatic inversion for perfusion imaging by arterial spin labeling.
NMR Biomed
1997;
10:
216–221.
10.1002/(SICI)1099-1492(199706/08)10:4/5<216::AID-NBM468>3.0.CO;2-U CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 5
Marro KI,
Hayes CE,
Kushmerick MJ.
A model of the inversion process in an arterial inversion experiment.
NMR Biomed
1997;
10:
324–332.
10.1002/(SICI)1099-1492(199710)10:7<324::AID-NBM491>3.0.CO;2-L CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 6 Song HK, Zhang Y, Anumula S, Wright AC, Wehrli FW. Inversion efficiency and measurement error in multiple-coil arterial spin labeling experiments. In: Proceedings of the 11th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Toronto, Canada, 2003. p 2215.
- 7 Gach HM, Kam AW, Reid ED, Talagala SL. Quantitative analysis of adiabatic fast passage for steady laminar and turbulent flows. Magn Reson Med 2002; 47: 709–719.
- 8 Utting JF, Thomas DL, Gadian DG, Ordidge RJ. Velocity-driven adiabatic fast passage for arterial spin labeling: results from a computer model. Magn Reson Med 2003; 49: 398–401.
- 9 Silva AC, Zhang W, Williams DS, Koretsky AP. Multi-slice MRI of rat brain perfusion during amphetamine stimulation using arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med 1995; 33: 209–214.
- 10 Zhang W, Silva AC, Williams DS, Koretsky AP. NMR measurement of perfusion using arterial spin labeling without saturation of macromolecular spins. Magn Reson Med 1995; 33: 370–376.
- 11
Zaharchuk G,
Ledden PJ,
Kwong KK,
Reese TG,
Rosen BR,
Wald LL.
Multislice perfusion and perfusion territory imaging in humans with separate label and image coils.
Magn Reson Med
1999;
41:
1093–1098.
10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(199906)41:6<1093::AID-MRM4>3.0.CO;2-0 CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 12 Trampel R, Mildner T, Görke U, Schäfer A, Driesel W, Norris DG. Continuous arterial spin labeling using a local magnetic field gradient coil. Magn Reson Med 2002; 48: 543–546.
- 13 Mildner T, Trampel R, Möller HE, Schäfer A, Wiggins CJ, Norris DG. Functional perfusion imaging using continuous arterial spin labeling with separate labeling and imaging coils at 3 T. Magn Reson Med 2003; 49: 791–795.
- 14 Norris DG. Adiabatic radiofrequency pulse forms in biomedical nuclear magnetic resonance. Concepts Magn Reson 2002; 14: 89–101.
- 15 Garwood M, DelaBarre L. The return of the frequency sweep: designing adiabatic pulses for contemporary NMR. J Magn Reson 2001; 153: 155–177.
- 16
Wansapura JP,
Holland SK,
Dunn RS,
Ball JrWS.
NMR relaxation times in the human brain at 3 Tesla.
J Magn Reson Imaging
1999;
9:
531–538.
10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(199904)9:4<531::AID-JMRI4>3.0.CO;2-L CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 17 Ugurbil K, Ogawa S, Kim SG, Hu X, Chen W, Zhu XH. Imaging brain activity using nuclear spins. In: B Maraviglia, editor. Magnetic resonance and brain function: approaches from physics. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 1999. p 261–301.
- 18 Lu H, Clingman C, Golay X, van Zijl P. What is the longitudinal relaxation time (T1) of blood at 3.0 Tesla? In: Proceedings of the 11th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Toronto, Canada, 2003. p 669.
- 19 Lee T, Stainsby JA, Hong J, Han E, Brittain J, Wright GA. Blood relaxation properties at 3T—effects of blood oxygen saturation. In: Proceedings of the 11th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Toronto, Canada, 2003. p 131.
- 20 Abragam A. The principles of nuclear magnetism. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1961.
- 21 Möller HE, Klocke H, Bongartz GM, Peters PE. MR flow quantification using RACE: clinical application to the carotid arteries. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996; 6: 503–512.
- 22 Jacobsohn B, Wangsness RK. Shapes of nuclear induction signals. Phys Rev 1948; 73: 942–946.
- 23 Zhernovoi AI. Fast adiabatic passage in nuclear magnetic resonance. Sov Phys Solid State 1967; 9: 523–524.
- 24 Hardy CJ, Edelstein WA, Vatis D. Efficient adiabatic fast passage for NMR population inversion in the presence of radiofrequency field inhomogeneity and frequency offsets. J Magn Reson 1986; 66: 470–482.
- 25 Torrey HC. Transient nutations in nuclear magnetic resonance. Phys Rev 1949; 76: 1059–1068.
- 26 Norris DG, Ludemann H, Leibfritz D. An analysis of the effects of short T2 values on the hyperbolic-secant pulse. J Magn Reson 1991; 92: 94–101.