Volume 41, Issue 3 pp. 258-262
CASE REPORT

Unilateral breast reconstruction with the free contralateral split breast flap using supermicrosurgical anastomosis: A case report

Mario F. Scaglioni MD

Corresponding Author

Mario F. Scaglioni MD

Department of Hand- and Plastic Surgery, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland

Correspondence

Mario F. Scaglioni, Department of Hand- and Plastic Surgery, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Spitalstrasse 6000, Lucern 16, Switzerland.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Timo Rodi MSc

Timo Rodi MSc

Department of Hand- and Plastic Surgery, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland

Heidelberg Medical Faculty, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Katarina Wishart MD

Katarina Wishart MD

Department of Hand- and Plastic Surgery, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
Elmar Fritsche MD

Elmar Fritsche MD

Department of Hand- and Plastic Surgery, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 19 September 2020
Citations: 5

Mario F. Scaglioni and Timo Rodi have contributed equally to this study and should be considered as co-first authors.

Abstrct

Consecutive or simultaneous contralateral breast reduction is a frequent request from patients undergoing unilateral breast reconstruction. Both procedures can be combined using otherwise discarded tissue as a split breast graft for reconstruction of the contralateral side. There have been few reports on the use of pedicled split breast grafts. We present a 75-year-old female with multicentric mammary carcinoma following chemotherapy, mastectomy, axillary lymph node dissection and radiotherapy. She requested a reconstruction of the left breast as well as reduction of the right breast. Risk factors, including heavy alcohol and tobacco dependence and COPD, limited the surgical options. While a free flap breast reconstruction was the standard feasible option, we opted for a procedure with minimal surgery-related morbidity. The right breast was evidently tumor-free, and the patient had no family history of breast cancer. Reconstruction was performed 22 months postmastectomy. The split-breast free flap was based on the right internal mammary artery (IMA) perforator and harvested during the right-sided breast reduction. Microsurgical anastomosis was performed on the IMA perforator on the left side. Mastopexy was performed on the right side and the nipple-areola complex (NAC) was transferred to its new position as a free graft to complete the breast reduction. A tattoo of the left NAC was performed 4 months postreconstruction. There was complete flap survival with a pleasant cosmetic result. Split breast reconstruction could be an alternative to more common procedures. However, this approach is only feasible in patients with hypertrophic contralateral breast and absence of risk factors for developing a second primary breast cancer.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.