Volume 35, Issue 1 pp. 29-33
Clinical Article

Simulated surgery and cutting guides enhance spatial positioning in free fibular mandibular reconstruction

E. Stirling Craig M.D.

E. Stirling Craig M.D.

Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT

Search for more papers by this author
Mikell Yuhasz B.S.

Mikell Yuhasz B.S.

Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT

Search for more papers by this author
Ajul Shah M.D.

Ajul Shah M.D.

Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT

Search for more papers by this author
Jeffrey Blumberg M.D.

Jeffrey Blumberg M.D.

Section of Otolaryngology, Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT

Search for more papers by this author
Jeffrey Salomon M.D.

Jeffrey Salomon M.D.

Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT

Search for more papers by this author
Roger Lowlicht D.D.S.

Roger Lowlicht D.D.S.

Section of Otolaryngology, Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT

Search for more papers by this author
Stefano Fusi M.D., M.B.A.

Stefano Fusi M.D., M.B.A.

Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT

Search for more papers by this author
Derek M. Steinbacher D.M.D., M.D.

Corresponding Author

Derek M. Steinbacher D.M.D., M.D.

Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT

Correspondence to: Derek M. Steinbacher, D.M.D., M.D., Assistant Professor in Surgery, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 330 Cedar Street, Boardman Building, 3rd Floor BB330, New Haven, CT 06520. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
First published: 28 January 2014
Citations: 62

Abstract

Introduction: The free fibular flap is the workhorse for mandibular reconstruction. Three-dimensional (3D) planning, with use of cutting guides and prebent plates, has been introduced. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the interfragmentary gap size and symmetry between conventional freehand preparation versus those using 3D planning. Methods: A retrospective review was performed. Conventional free form and 3D planned fibular reconstructions performed by the senior authors at a single institution were included. Reconstructions were further subdivided into “body only” and “complex.” Demographic and intraoperative data were collected. Postoperative CT scans were analyzed using Materialize software. Interfragmentary gap distances (mm) and symmetry (degrees) were assessed. Results: Nineteen fibular reconstructions met inclusion criteria, ten conventional free form, and nine 3D planned reconstructions. Interfibular gaps measured 0.36 ± 0.50 mm in the 3D group versus 1.88 ± 1.09 mm in the non-3D group (P = 0.004). Overall symmetry (a ratio between right and left angles) measured versus 1.027 ± 0.08 in the 3D-planned versus 1.024 ± 0.09 in the non-3D group in (P = 0.944). Within only mandibular body reconstructions, symmetry was similar between the two techniques: 1.05 ± 0.12 in the 3D group versus 0.97 ± 0.05 in the non-3D group (P = 0.295). Conclusions: 3D planning lessens interfibular gap dimensions and may enhance axial symmetry. Space between native mandible and fibula is not appreciably altered using planning. Future efforts will focus on the accuracy and reproducibility of the 3D planned to actual results as well as clinical significance and efficiency benefits. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery 35:29–33, 2015.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.