Volume 134, Issue 2 pp. 517-525
Systematic Review

Prediction Models for Dysphagia in Intensive Care Unit after Mechanical Ventilation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Juan Chen MD

Juan Chen MD

School of Nursing and Public Health, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China

Search for more papers by this author
Guangyu Lu PhD

Guangyu Lu PhD

Institute of Public Health, Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China

Search for more papers by this author
Zhiyao Wang MD

Zhiyao Wang MD

Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China

Neuro Intensive Care Unit, Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China

Search for more papers by this author
Jingyue Zhang MD

Jingyue Zhang MD

School of Nursing and Public Health, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China

Search for more papers by this author
Jiali Ding MD

Jiali Ding MD

School of Nursing and Public Health, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China

Search for more papers by this author
Qingping Zeng MD

Qingping Zeng MD

School of Nursing and Public Health, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China

Search for more papers by this author
Liying Chai MD

Liying Chai MD

School of Nursing and Public Health, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China

Institute of Public Health, Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China

Search for more papers by this author
Li Zhao MD

Li Zhao MD

School of Nursing and Public Health, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China

Institute of Public Health, Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China

Search for more papers by this author
Hailong Yu PhD

Hailong Yu PhD

Neuro Intensive Care Unit, Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China

Department of Neurology, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Yangzhou, China

Search for more papers by this author
Yuping Li PhD

Corresponding Author

Yuping Li PhD

Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China

Neuro Intensive Care Unit, Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China

Send correspondence to Yuping Li, Neuro-Intensive Care Unit, Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Medical College, Yangzhou University, Jiangsu 225001, China. Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 06 August 2023
Editor's Note: This Manuscript was accepted for publication on July 13, 2023.

Juan Chen, Guangyu Lu contributed equally to this study.

The authors have no other funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose.

Abstract

Objective

Dysphagia is a common condition that can independently lead to death in patients in the intensive care unit (ICU), particularly those who require mechanical ventilation. Despite extensive research on the predictors of dysphagia development, consistency across these studies is lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to identify predictors and summarize existing prediction models for dysphagia in ICU patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation.

Methods

We searched five databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure. Studies that developed a post-extubation dysphagia risk prediction model in ICU were included. A meta-analysis of individual predictor variables was performed with mixed-effects models. The risk of bias was assessed using the prediction model risk of bias assessment tool (PROBAST).

Results

After screening 1,923 references, we ultimately included nine studies in our analysis. The most commonly identified risk predictors included in the final risk prediction model were the length of indwelling endotracheal tube ≥72 h, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score ≥15, age ≥65 years, and duration of gastric tube ≥72 h. However, PROBAST analysis revealed a high risk of bias in the performance of these prediction models, mainly because of the lack of external validation, inadequate pre-screening of variables, and improper treatment of continuous and categorical predictors.

Conclusions

These models are particularly susceptible to bias because of numerous limitations in their development and inadequate external validation. Future research should focus on externally validating the existing model in ICU patients with varying characteristics. Moreover, assessing the acceptance and effectiveness of the model in clinical practice is needed.

Level of Evidence

NA Laryngoscope, 134:517–525, 2024

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.