Volume 131, Issue 11 pp. E2749-E2754
Comprehensive Otolaryngology

COVID-19 Cross-Infection Rate After Surgical Procedures: Incidence and Outcome

Bassem Mettias MD, MsC, PhD, FRCS (ORL-HNS)

Corresponding Author

Bassem Mettias MD, MsC, PhD, FRCS (ORL-HNS)

Leicester Royal Infirmary, Infirmary Square, Leicester, LE1 5WW United Kingdom

Send correspondence to Bassem Mettias, ENT Department, Leicester Royal Infirmary Hospital, LE15WW Leicester, United Kingdom. E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Manish Mair MBBS, MS (ENT), MCh (Head & Neck Surgery)

Manish Mair MBBS, MS (ENT), MCh (Head & Neck Surgery)

Leicester Royal Infirmary, Infirmary Square, Leicester, LE1 5WW United Kingdom

Search for more papers by this author
Peter Conboy MB ChB FRCS FRCS (ORL-HNS)

Peter Conboy MB ChB FRCS FRCS (ORL-HNS)

Leicester Royal Infirmary, Infirmary Square, Leicester, LE1 5WW United Kingdom

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 26 May 2021
Citations: 2

Editor's Note: This Manuscript was accepted for publication on May 20, 2021.

The authors have no funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose.

Abstract

Objectives/Hypothesis

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARSCoV-2) is transmitted by droplet as well as airborne infection. Surgical patients are vulnerable to the infection during their hospital admission. Some surgical procedures are classified as aerosol generating (AGP).

Study Design

Retrospective observational study of four specialties associates with known AGP's during the 4 months of the first wave of UK COVID-19 epidermic to identify post-surgical cross-infection with SARSCoV-2 within 14 days of a procedure.

Methods

Retrospective observational study in a tertiary healthcare center of four specialties associates with known AGP's during the 4 months of the first wave of UK COVID-19 epidermic to identify post-surgical cross-infection with SARSCoV-2 within 14 days of a procedure.

Results

There were 3,410 procedures reported during this period. The overall cross-infection rate from tested patients was 1.3% (4 patients), that is, 0.11% of all operations over 4 months. Ear, nose, and throat carried slightly higher rate of infection (0.4%) than gastroenterology (0.08%). The mortality rate was 0.3% (one gastroenterology patient from 304 positive cases) compared to 0% if surgery performed after recovery from SARSCoV-2 and 37.5% when surgery was conducted during the incubation period of the disease. Routine preoperative rapid screening tests and self-isolation are crucial to avoid the risk of cross-infection. Patients with underlying malignancy or receiving chemotherapy were more prone to pulmonary complications and mortality.

Conclusion

The risk of SARS-COV-2 cross-infection after surgical procedure is very low. Preoperative screening and self-isolation together with personal protective measures should be in place to minimize the cross-infection.

Level of Evidence

4 Laryngoscope, 131:E2749–E2754, 2021

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.