Volume 131, Issue 11 pp. 2540-2544
Laryngology

Optimal Arytenoid Position in Laryngeal Framework Surgery: An Anatomic Human Larynx Study

Elizabeth S. Burckardt MD

Elizabeth S. Burckardt MD

Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Center for Laryngeal Surgery and Voice Rehabilitation, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Gerardo Lopez-Guerra MD

Gerardo Lopez-Guerra MD

Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Center for Laryngeal Surgery and Voice Rehabilitation, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
James B. Kobler PhD

James B. Kobler PhD

Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Center for Laryngeal Surgery and Voice Rehabilitation, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Monica A. Tynan BS

Monica A. Tynan BS

Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Center for Laryngeal Surgery and Voice Rehabilitation, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Robert H. Petrillo BS

Robert H. Petrillo BS

Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Center for Laryngeal Surgery and Voice Rehabilitation, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Jarrad H. Van Stan PhD

Jarrad H. Van Stan PhD

Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Center for Laryngeal Surgery and Voice Rehabilitation, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
James A. Burns MD

Corresponding Author

James A. Burns MD

Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Center for Laryngeal Surgery and Voice Rehabilitation, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.

Send Correspondence to James A. Burns, MD, FACS, Associate Professor, Harvard Medical School, Center for Laryngeal Surgery and Voice Rehabilitation, One Bowdoin Square: 11th floor, Boston, MA 02114. E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 17 April 2021

Editor's Note: This Manuscript was accepted for publication on April 12, 2021.

This work was presented at the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Broncho-Esophagological Association, occurring virtually with the Combined Otolaryngology Spring Meetings (COSM) April 7, 2021.

The authors have no funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose.

Abstract

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to better understand the effects of stitch placement on arytenoid medialization by measuring normative cricoarytenoid joint anatomy and changes in arytenoid position when varying arytenopexy stitch configuration.

Methods

This adult human larynx study was done in two parts. First, measurements of the cricoid and arytenoid cartilage anatomy relevant to cricoarytenoid joint function were made in 45 preserved larynges (26 male (M), 19 female (F)) using digital calipers. Second, the arytenoids of six fresh larynges ( three M, three F) were sutured to the cricoid using various arytenopexy-stitch placements ranging from inferior-lateral to superior-medial, and the resulting arytenoid positions were compared by measuring medial displacement of the arytenoid body and change in glottal configuration from macro still images using Image J. Paired t-tests were used to compare the results.

Results

Cartilage and joint facet dimensions showed differences between males (M) and females (F). Cricoid facet lengths averaged 9.3 mm (M) and 7.1 mm (F), and widths averaged 4.9 mm (M) and 4.0 mm (F). The arytenoid facet widths averaged 10.5 mm (M) and 9.7 mm (F). Average distances between cricoid facets were 11.8 mm for both males and females. Securing the arytenoid superior-medially on the cricoid facet produced more medialization (2.2 mm vs 1.0 mm, P < .001) and better glottic aperture configuration (9.5° vs 2.7°, P < .001) than securing the arytenoid inferior-laterally on the facet.

Conclusions

Anatomic consistency in cricoarytenoid anatomy provides reliable surgical landmarks for ideal placement of an arytenopexy suture to optimally reposition the arytenoid cartilage. Optimal arytenoid medialization can be accurately reproduced with an arytenopexy-suture that is placed superior-medially on the cricoid facet.

Level of Evidence

NA Laryngoscope, 131:2540–2544, 2021

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.