Volume 131, Issue 4 pp. E1049-E1053
Original Report

Rate and Factors Associated With Change in Surgeon for Revision Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

Aria Jafari MD

Corresponding Author

Aria Jafari MD

Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Rhinology and Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, U.S.A.

a.j. and b.a.p. contributed equally to this work (co–first authors).

Send correspondence to Aria Jafari, MD, Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Rhinology and Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery, University of Washington, Box 356515, Health Sciences Building, Suite BB1165, Seattle, WA 98195-6515, E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Bharat A. Panuganti MD

Bharat A. Panuganti MD

Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, U.S.A.

a.j. and b.a.p. contributed equally to this work (co–first authors).

Search for more papers by this author
Kayva L. Crawford MD

Kayva L. Crawford MD

Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Sarek Shen MS

Sarek Shen MS

School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Adam S. DeConde MD

Adam S. DeConde MD

Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 31 August 2020
Citations: 1

Editor's Note: This Manuscript was accepted for publication on July 23, 2020.

Presented at the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Annual Meeting, Atlanta, Georgia, U.S.A., October 7–10, 2018.

Adam S. DeConde is a consultant for Sanofi, Stryker Endoscopy, Olympus, and Optinose, which are not affiliated with this investigation.

The authors have no funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose.

Abstract

Objectives/Hypothesis

A subset of patients will undergo revision endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) with a different otolaryngologist than the one who performed their primary surgery. The purpose of this study is to report the incidence of and clinicodemographic factors associated with a change in surgeon for revision ESS.

Study Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Methods

Adult patients who underwent at least two outpatient ESS procedures between 2009 and 2014 using the State Ambulatory Surgery Database for Florida were included in the study. Change in surgeon was defined by a change in a unique provider identifier for the revision procedure. Multivariable regression analysis was used to determine characteristics associated with a change in surgeon.

Results

A total of 2,963 patients were included. For the revision procedure, 47.7% of patients changed their surgeon. On multivariable logistic regression, a medium- (odds ratio [OR]: 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.53-0.77) or high-volume (OR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.42-0.61) surgeon performing the index surgery and advanced age (≥65 years) (OR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.63-0.99) were associated with decreased odds of surgeon change for revision ESS. Longer time elapsed between index and revision surgery (OR: 1.15; 95% CI: 1.13-1.17) was associated with increased odds of surgeon change.

Conclusions

Nearly half of patients who undergo revision ESS select a surgeon other than the one who performed their primary procedure. Surgeon volume, age, and time between surgeries affect the likelihood of a change in surgeon for revision ESS. These findings may provide introductory insights into patient preferences and decision making in the surgical management of recalcitrant chronic rhinosinusitis.

Level of Evidence

4 Laryngoscope, 131:E1049–E1053, 2021

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.