Volume 129, Issue 6 pp. E213-E219
Head and Neck

Experimental animal model for assessment of tracheal epithelium regeneration

Elizaveta I. Safronova MD

Elizaveta I. Safronova MD

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation.

Search for more papers by this author
Sergey S. Dydykin MD, PhD

Sergey S. Dydykin MD, PhD

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation.

Search for more papers by this author
Evgeny D. Grigorevskiy MD

Evgeny D. Grigorevskiy MD

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation.

Search for more papers by this author
Ekaterina A. Tverye

Ekaterina A. Tverye

National Research Center Kurchatov Institute, Moscow, Russian Federation.

Search for more papers by this author
Stepan I. Kolchenko

Stepan I. Kolchenko

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation.

Search for more papers by this author
Natalia N. Piskunova

Natalia N. Piskunova

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation.

Search for more papers by this author
Anna V. Denisova MD

Anna V. Denisova MD

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation.

Search for more papers by this author
Galina P. Titova MD, PhD

Galina P. Titova MD, PhD

Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Medicine, Moscow, Russian Federation.

Search for more papers by this author
Vladimir D. Parshin MD, PhD

Vladimir D. Parshin MD, PhD

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation.

Search for more papers by this author
Olga A. Romanova PhD

Olga A. Romanova PhD

National Research Center Kurchatov Institute, Moscow, Russian Federation.

Search for more papers by this author
Andrey A. Panteleyev PhD

Corresponding Author

Andrey A. Panteleyev PhD

National Research Center Kurchatov Institute, Moscow, Russian Federation.

Send correspondence to Andrey A. Panteleyev, Ph.D., National Research Centre, Kurchatov Institute, 1, Akademika Kurchatova pl.,123182, Moscow, Russia. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
First published: 19 November 2018
Citations: 6

This work was supported by intramural funding from the National Research Center Kurchatov Institute (1386). The authors have no other funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose.

Abstract

Objectives/Hypothesis

To develop an experimental model in rabbits for assessment of tracheal epithelium regeneration through application of either natural or artificial polymer scaffolds.

Study Design

First, we identified the size of full-thickness mucosal defect, which does not allow self-healing (a “critical defect”), thus representing an adequate experimental model for regenerative therapy of tracheal epithelium damage. Then, two methods of polymer scaffold fixation at the site of the epithelium defect were compared: suturing and fixation with a stent. This was done through: 1) formation of a full-thickness anterolateral mucosal defect by tracheal mucosa excision; and 2) fixation of the scaffold at the site of the tracheal epithelium defect using sutures (through a tracheal wall “window”) or a vascular stent (through a small tracheal incision).

Results

The dimension of a critical anterolateral mucosal defect of the trachea for rabbits was found to be 1.5 cm in length and more than 50% of the tracheal circumference. Fixation of the scaffold with a stent proved to be more efficient due to a uniform distribution of the pressure over the entire surface of the scaffold, whereas the suturing of the scaffold provided unsatisfactory results. In addition, fixation of the scaffold by suturing required formation of a large “window” in the tracheal wall. Thus, using the stent appeared to be technically less complicated and much less traumatic as compared to suturing.

Conclusion

We present an experimental in vivo animal model of tracheal epithelium injury and recovery. It can be effectively used with certain further modifications as a basis for routine testing of bioengineered constructs.

Level of Evidence

NA

Laryngoscope, 129:E213–E219, 2019

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.