Volume 129, Issue 5 pp. 1113-1116
Head and Neck

Osseous Changes Over Time in Free Fibular Flap Reconstruction

Tom Shokri MD

Tom Shokri MD

Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Hershey, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Lauren E. Stahl BS

Lauren E. Stahl BS

Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Hershey, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Sangam G. Kanekar MD

Sangam G. Kanekar MD

Department of Radiology, Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Neerav Goyal MD, MPH

Corresponding Author

Neerav Goyal MD, MPH

Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Hershey, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.

Send correspondence to Neerav Goyal, MD, Assistant Professor of Surgery, Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, P. O. Box 850, Hershey, PA 17033-0850. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
First published: 03 October 2018
Citations: 20

Presented at the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Meeting at the Combined Otolaryngology Spring Meetings, San Diego, California, U.S.A., April 26–30, 2017.

The authors have no funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose.

Abstract

Objectives/Hypothesis

Evaluate bone resorption in free fibular grafts and document resorption behavior as compared to dentulous and edentulous autochthonous mandibular bone.

Study Design

Retrospective Chart review.

Methods

Postoperative computed tomography images were used to evaluate fibular graft resorption rates and corresponding sites of the dentulous or edentulous mandible. Bone height, width, and cortical thickness were measured.

Results

Eighteen patients underwent fibula free flap reconstruction following resection of a primary head and neck cancer. Mandibular defects were classified using Jewer's classification. The average interval loss of osseous height was 0.23 ± 0.09 mm/yr for fibula flap, 0.55 ± 0.13 mm/yr for dentulous native mandible, and 0.98 ± 0.41 mm/yr in edentulous native mandible. Change in osseous width was 0.19 ± 0.08 mm/yr, 0.55 ± 0.33 mm/yr, and 0.73 ± 0.15 mm/yr, respectively. Rate of superior cortical resorption was 0.33 ± 0.34 mm/yr, 0.35 ± 0.13 mm/yr, and 0.53 ± 0.11 mm/yr in fibula flap, dentulous, and edentulous mandible, respectively. Inferior cortical resorption rates were quantified as 0.30 ± 0.11 mm/yr, 0.35 ± 0.08 mm/yr, and 0.51 ± 0.08 mm/yr.

Conclusions

Fibula free flap reconstruction of the mandible provides excellent functional results and allows for stable outcomes. Bone resorption is significantly lower in fibular graft compared with both edentulous and dentulous mandible. Edentulous bone displays significantly increased rates of atrophy in comparison to the dentulous mandible. This may have implications with regard to long-term viability of both the fibular flap and native mandible. The role of dental restoration on overall osseous stability warrants further research.

Level of Evidence

4 Laryngoscope, 129:1113–1116, 2019

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.