Volume 120, Issue 7 pp. 1336-1341
Head and Neck

Head and neck radiotherapy compliance in an underserved patient population

Rajni A. Sethi MD

Rajni A. Sethi MD

Department of Radiation Oncology, New York, New York, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Emily F. Stamell BS

Emily F. Stamell BS

New York University Langone Medical Center and New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Leah Price MS

Leah Price MS

Department of Biostatistics, New York, New York, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Mark DeLacure MD

Mark DeLacure MD

Department of Head and Neck Surgery Division of Otolaryngology, New York, New York, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Nicholas Sanfilippo MD

Corresponding Author

Nicholas Sanfilippo MD

Department of Radiation Oncology, New York, New York, U.S.A.

NYU Cancer Center, 160 East 34th Street, New York, NY 10016Search for more papers by this author
First published: 25 June 2010
Citations: 15

The authors have no funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose.

Abstract

Objectives/Hypothesis:

Compliance to intensive multiweek radiation therapy (RT) regimens in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients is challenging, particularly among medically underserved patients with fewer financial and social resources. Treatment prolongation reduces local control and overall survival rates, making adherence to treatment a key factor in optimal outcome. We evaluated factors affecting compliance in medically underserved patients who received RT for HNC in a large municipal hospital setting in New York City.

Study Design:

Retrospective review.

Methods:

Treatment records of patients treated between July 2004 and August 2008 were reviewed. Number of and reasons for missed treatments were identified. Several demographic, toxicity, and treatment variables were analyzed for impact on compliance.

Results:

Eighty consecutive HNC patients who underwent RT with a 5- to 7-week regimen were identified. Thirty-two patients (40%) missed no treatments, 36 (45%) missed one to six treatments, six (8%) missed seven to 14 treatments, two (3%) missed more than 14 treatments, and four (5%) did not complete treatment. Reasons for missed treatments were hospitalization (31% of events) and toxicity (20%). Patients with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube were more likely to miss treatments (P = .01, χ2 test). No other variable showed a significant association with missed treatments (χ2 test).

Conclusions:

Intensive RT for HNC can be delivered with very good adherence within a medically underserved population. Eighty-five percent of patients completed treatment with 0 to 6 days of interruption. Efforts to further improve adherence in this population are ongoing. Laryngoscope, 2010

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.