Volume 125, Issue 4 pp. 642-645
PANCREAS

The aborted Whipple: Why, and what happens next?

Mihir M. Shah

Mihir M. Shah

Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Pranay S. Ajay

Pranay S. Ajay

Department of Surgical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Rebecca S. Meltzer

Rebecca S. Meltzer

Department of General Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Mohammad R. Jajja

Mohammad R. Jajja

Division of Transplantation, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Cricket R. Gullickson

Cricket R. Gullickson

Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Kenneth Cardona

Kenneth Cardona

Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Maria C. Russell

Maria C. Russell

Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Juan M. Sarmiento

Juan M. Sarmiento

Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Shishir K. Maithel

Shishir K. Maithel

Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Search for more papers by this author
David A. Kooby

Corresponding Author

David A. Kooby

Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Correspondence David A. Kooby, Emory University School of Medicine, 5665 Peachtree Dunwoody Rd, Oncology Suite, Atlanta, GA 30342, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 11 January 2022
Citations: 2

Abstract

Background

For patients with periampullary adenocarcinoma (PAC), pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) provides the best survival. Surgery on a subset of patients is aborted during PD. We analyzed these patients.

Methods

Patients who underwent laparotomy for planned PD for PAC were identified (2006–2019). From operative notes, we identified the subset with intraoperative decision to abort. Patient, treatment, and outcome data were analyzed. The subset with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) was analyzed for survival.

Results

Only 6.7% (n = 55/819) of cases were aborted. Majority 78% (n = 43) had pathologically-confirmed diagnoses at time of surgery, and 18.2% (n = 10) received preoperative chemotherapy. Reasons for aborted PD included: distant metastases (65.5%, n = 36) and local invasion (34.5%, n = 19). Of patients with metastatic disease, 75% (n = 27) had liver metastases. Eighty-nine percent (n = 49) of patients underwent at least one palliative bypass procedure and 81.8% (n = 45) had both gastric and biliary bypass. Patients with computed tomography (CT) scans before surgery more commonly had missed metastatic disease (79.2% CT compared to 54.8% magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], χ2 = 3.54, p = 0.059). In PDAC, 61.4% (n = 27/44) were aborted for metastatic disease and 38.7% (n = 17/44) for local invasion. Median overall survival for all PDAC patients after aborted PD was 334 days.

Conclusion

Majority of pancreatoduodenectomies for periampullary adenocarcinoma are done to completion. Liver metastases is the most common reason for aborting. Preoperative MRI may help identify hepatic metastases.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.