Volume 36, Issue 5 pp. 1104-1112
Original Research

Computer aided analysis of breast MRI enhancement kinetics using mean shift c lustering and multifeature iterative region of interest selection

Mark J. Stoutjesdijk MD, PhD

Corresponding Author

Mark J. Stoutjesdijk MD, PhD

Ikazia Hospital Radiology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Ikazia Hospital, department of Radiology, Montessoriweg 1, Rotterdam, The NetherlandsSearch for more papers by this author
Miranda Zijp MSc

Miranda Zijp MSc

Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Carla Boetes PhD

Carla Boetes PhD

Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands

Carla Boetes, MD, PhD, recently passed away.

Search for more papers by this author
Nico Karssemeijer PhD

Nico Karssemeijer PhD

Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Jelle O. Barentsz MD, PhD

Jelle O. Barentsz MD, PhD

Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Henkjan Huisman PhD

Henkjan Huisman PhD

Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 11 July 2012
Citations: 4

Abstract

Purpose:

To evaluate automatic characterization of a breast MR lesion by its spatially coherent region of interest (ROI).

Materials and Methods:

The method delineated 247 enhancing lesions using Otsu thresholding after manually placing a sphere. Mean Shift Clustering subdivided each volume, based on features including pharmacokinetic parameters. An iteratively trained classifier to predict the most suspicious ROI (IsR) was used, to predict the malignancy likelihood of each lesion. Performance was evaluated using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis, and compared with a previous prototype. IsR was compared with noniterative training. The effect of adding BI-RADS™ morphology (from a radiologist) to the classifier was investigated.

Results:

The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI] of 0.77–0.88), and was 0.75 (95%CI = 0.68–0.81; P = 0.029) without pharmacokinetic features. IsR performed better than conventional selection, based on one feature (AUC 0.75, 95%CI = 0.68–0.81; P = 0.035). With morphology, the AUC was 0.84 (95%CI = 0.78–0.88) versus 0.82 without (P = 0.40).

Conclusion:

Breast lesions can be characterized by their most suspicious, contiguous ROI using multi-feature clustering and iterative training. Characterization was improved by including pharmacokinetic modeling, while in our experiments, including morphology did not improve characterization. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2012;36:1104–1112. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.