Volume 108, Issue 3 pp. 398-413
Research Article

Resurgence of time allocation

Carlos R. X. Cançado

Corresponding Author

Carlos R. X. Cançado

Universidade de Brasília

West Virginia University

Address correspondence to: Carlos Cançado ([email protected]) or to Kennon A. Lattal ([email protected])Search for more papers by this author
Kennon A. Lattal

Corresponding Author

Kennon A. Lattal

West Virginia University

Address correspondence to: Carlos Cançado ([email protected]) or to Kennon A. Lattal ([email protected])Search for more papers by this author
H. K. Carpenter

H. K. Carpenter

West Virginia University

Search for more papers by this author
Elizabeth A. Solley

Elizabeth A. Solley

West Virginia University

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 03 November 2017
Citations: 3
Portions of these data were presented at the 36th Annual Convention of the Association for Behavior Analysis International, San Antonio, Texas, 2010. Experiment 1 was conducted by H. K. Carpenter in partial fulfillment of the requirements for an undergraduate honors thesis in the Department of Psychology at West Virginia University. We thank Josele Abreu-Rodrigues and Raquel Aló for thoughtful discussions and suggestions on data analyses. Kennon A. Lattal was supported during the writing of this article by a Fulbright award at Université Charles de Gaulle, Lille, France, supported by Le Conseil Régional de Nord-Pas-de-Calais. Carlos Cançado was supported during the writing of this article by a postdoctoral fellowship (PNPD-CAPES) at Universidade de Brasília (Instituto de Psicologia, Departamento de Processos Psicológicos Básicos), Brazil.

Abstract

The resurgence of time allocation with pigeons was studied in three experiments. In Phase 1 of each experiment, response-independent food occurred with different probabilities in the presence of two different keylights. Each peck on the key changed its color and the food probability in effect. In Phase 2, the food probabilities associated with each keylight were reversed and, in Phase 3, food was discontinued in the presence of either keylight. The food probabilities were .25 and .75, in Experiment 1, and 0.0 and 1.0 in Experiment 2. More time was allocated to the keylight correlated with more probable food in Phases 1 and 2, and in Phase 3 resurgence of time allocation occurred for two of three pigeons in Experiment 1, and for each of four pigeons in Experiment 2. Because time had to be allocated to either of the two alternatives in Experiments 1 and 2, however, it was difficult to characterize the time allocation patterns in Phase 3 as resurgence when changeover responding approached zero. In Experiment 3 this issue was addressed by providing a third alternative uncorrelated with food such that in each phase, after 30 s in the presence of either keylight correlated with food, the third alternative always was reinstated, requiring a response to access either of the two keylights correlated with food. In this experiment, the food probabilities were similar to those in Experiment 1. Resurgence of time allocation occurred for each of three pigeons under this procedure. The results of these experiments suggest that patterns of time allocation resurge similarly to discrete responses and to spatial and temporal patterns of responding.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.