Volume 107, Issue 2 pp. 279-293
Technical Article

How different is a 3D-printed replica from a conspecific in the eyes of a zebrafish?

Tommaso Ruberto

Tommaso Ruberto

New York University Tandon School of Engineering

Search for more papers by this author
Giovanni Polverino

Giovanni Polverino

New York University Tandon School of Engineering

Search for more papers by this author
Maurizio Porfiri

Corresponding Author

Maurizio Porfiri

New York University Tandon School of Engineering

Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Maurizio Porfiri, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, New York University Tandon School of Engineering, 6 Metrotech Center, Brooklyn, NY 11201, USA. Contact: [email protected], 646-997-3681 (phone), 646-997-3532 (fax).Search for more papers by this author
First published: 22 February 2017
Citations: 24
Tommaso Ruberto, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, New York University Tandon School of Engineering, Brooklyn, NY 11201, USA
Giovanni Polverino, Department of Biology and Ecology of Fishes, Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Berlin, Germany
Maurizio Porfiri, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, New York University Tandon School of Engineering, Brooklyn, NY 11201, USA
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant # CMMI-1433670.
Final Acceptance: February 3, 2017

Abstract

Robotics is emerging as a promising tool for aiding research on animal behavior. The possibility of generating customizable, controllable, and standardized robotic stimuli has been demonstrated through a number of behavioral assays, involving vertebrates and invertebrates. However, the specific appraisal of the nature of robotic stimuli is currently lacking. Here, we attempt to evaluate this aspect in zebrafish, through a within-subject design in which experimental subjects are faced with three experimental conditions. In the first test, we investigated sociability by measuring zebrafish response to a conspecific separated by a one-way glass. In the second test, we studied zebrafish behavior in response to a 3D-printed zebrafish replica actuated along realistic trajectories through a novel four-degree-of-freedom robotic platform. Last, we investigated fear responses in a shelter-seeking test. In agreement with our expectations, zebrafish exhibited an equivalent preference for live and robotic stimuli, and the degree of preference for the robotic replica correlated negatively with the individual propensity to seek shelter. The equivalent preference for the replica and conspecific suggests that the appraisal of the target stimuli is analogous. The preliminary evidence of a correlation between behavioral responses across tests points to the readability of robotics-based approaches to investigate interindividual differences.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.