Volume 29, Issue 1 pp. 4-7

Reply to “Comment on Aromatic-Backbone Interactions in Model α-Helical Peptides”

József Csontos

József Csontos

Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, Creighton University, Omaha, Nebraska

Search for more papers by this author
Nicholas Y. Palermo

Nicholas Y. Palermo

Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, Creighton University, Omaha, Nebraska

Search for more papers by this author
Richard F. Murphy

Richard F. Murphy

Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, Creighton University, Omaha, Nebraska

Search for more papers by this author
Sándor Lovas

Corresponding Author

Sándor Lovas

Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, Creighton University, Omaha, Nebraska

Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, Creighton University, Omaha, NebraskaSearch for more papers by this author
First published: 13 November 2007
Citations: 6

Abstract

In response to Van Mourik's comments on our paper (J Comput Chem 2007, 28, 1208.) we present an extended version of our rotation method. We also prove that intramolecular interaction energies as well the basis set superposition errors calculated with our rotation method are comparable with those obtained by the counterpoise method of Boys and Bernardi (Mol Phys 1970, 19, 533). In intramolecular interaction energy calculations, if the interacting groups are in proximity, our rotation method is recommended to avoid artificial interactions, which can be induced by fragmentation. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.J Comput Chem, 2008

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.